Latae Sententiae and Ferendae Sententiae

GuideThe office and its competence are governed by current ecclesiastical law; origins, former arrangements, and particular holders are historical matters. Canonical discipline must not be confused with dogma.
Contents

Latae Sententiae and Ferendae Sententiae is the canonical distinction between a penalty incurred by the commission of a delict when law expressly provides and a penalty that binds only after it is imposed.

Latae sententiae (Latin for 'of a judgment having been brought') and ferendae sententiae ('of a judgment having to be brought') are ways sentences are imposed in the Catholic Church in its canon law.[2]

A latae sententiae penalty is a penalty the liability for which is imposed ipso facto, automatically, by force of the law itself, at the very moment a law is contravened; the fact that the offender is subject to the penalty is thus axiomatic. A ferendae sententiae penalty is a penalty that is imposed on a guilty party only after a case has been brought and decided by an authority in the Church.[3]

The 1983 Code of Canon Law, which binds Catholics of the Latin Church, inflicts latae sententiae censures for certain forbidden actions. However, the current canon law that binds members of the Eastern Catholic Churches, the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, does not include latae sententiae penalties.[4]

The application of a latae sententiae penalty requires no intervention by a judge. It falls therefore mainly to individual faithful who, if they have committed a crime for which a latae sententiae penalty is envisaged, must conscientiously assess the existence of some mitigating circumstance.[5]

The general rule

A ferendae sententiae penalty does not bind an offender until competent authority imposes it after the procedure required by law. This is the ordinary form of canonical penalty. The investigation and process establish the external delict, imputability, applicable law, defenses, and the just response.

A latae sententiae penalty is incurred by the fact of committing a delict only when a law or precept expressly establishes that effect. The Latin phrase does not mean that every grave sin, every public scandal, or every violation of canon law automatically carries excommunication. Automatic penalties are exceptional and must be stated as such.[1]

Conditions and exemptions

No penalty is incurred without an external violation gravely imputable by reason of malice or culpability. Canons 1323 and 1324 list circumstances that exclude or diminish liability, including age, lack of the use of reason, inculpable ignorance, grave fear in defined circumstances, necessity, and imperfect imputability. A person covered by a mitigating circumstance listed in canon 1324 does not incur a latae sententiae penalty.

Because the legal consequences are exact, private persons should not pronounce others automatically excommunicated on rumor or inference. The facts, knowledge, freedom, canonical age, applicable text, reservations, and possible excuses matter. Sin in the moral forum, commission of a canonical delict, and legal incurrence of a particular penalty are related but not interchangeable judgments.

Imposed and declared penalties

Competent authority imposes a ferendae sententiae penalty. It may declare a latae sententiae penalty already incurred when the delict and liability are established. Declaration makes the canonical situation certain in the external forum and can trigger legal effects that depend specifically on an imposed or declared censure.

Censures and expiatory penalties

Excommunication, interdict, and suspension are censures ordered to the offender's reform; they cease through remission after withdrawal from contumacy according to law. Expiatory penalties deprive a person of an office, right, faculty, title, or other good for a time or permanently. The mode of incurrence and the kind of penalty are separate classifications.

Pastoral and juridical treatment

The Church's penal law is medicinal and protective without treating grave delicts as unreal. Pastors must care for the offender's conversion, the rights and safety of victims, the restoration of justice, and the repair of scandal. Confidential sacramental advice and public canonical status belong to different forums.

Remission may be reserved to a specified authority, and danger of death activates special faculties established by law. A person who may have incurred a censure should seek competent canonical and pastoral assistance rather than rely on an internet checklist or a self-issued verdict.

Penalties in the 1983 Code of Canon Law

The censures that the 1983 Code of Canon Law envisages are excommunication, interdict, and suspension. Excommunication prohibits participation in certain forms of liturgical worship and church governance.[6] Interdict involves the same liturgical restrictions as excommunication, but does not affect participation in church governance.[7] Suspension, which affects only members of the clergy, prohibits certain acts by a cleric, whether the acts are of a religious character deriving from his ordination ("acts of the power of orders") or are exercises of his power of governance or of rights and functions attached to the office he holds.[8]

Latae sententiae sanctions

Latae sententiae excommunications

Unless the excusing circumstances outlined in canons 1321–1330[9] exist, the 1983 Code of Canon Law (significantly updated in 2021)[10] imposes latae sententiae excommunication on the following:

Legislation outside of the 1983 Code of Canon Law may also decree latae sententiae excommunication. An example is that governing papal elections, which applies it to persons who violate secrecy, or who interfere with the election by means such as simony or communicating the veto of a civil authority.[20]

The ipso facto excommunication that applied before 1983 to Catholics who became members of Masonic associations was not maintained in the 1983 Code of Canon Law that came into force in that year. However, the Holy See has declared that membership remains forbidden and that "The faithful who enrol in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion".[21]

Latae sententiae interdicts

Instances in which one incurs a latae sententiae interdict include the following:

An example of an interdict that is not latae sententiae but instead ferendae sententiae is that given in canon 1374 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law: "One who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or moderates such an association, however, is to be punished with an interdict."[25]

Latae sententiae suspensions

Automatic suspension applies to clerics (those who have been ordained at least to the diaconate) in the following cases:

  • a cleric who uses physical violence against a bishop;[26]
  • a deacon who attempts to celebrate the sacrifice of the Mass; or a priest who, though not empowered to grant sacramental absolution, attempts to do so or hears sacramental confession[27] (the empowerment or faculty in question is granted either by the law itself, for instance to those who hold certain offices, or by certain ecclesiastical superiors of the penitents[28] and penitents in danger of death can be validly absolved even by a priest without the faculty to hear confessions, and even if a priest with the faculty is present);[29]
  • a cleric who celebrates a sacrament through simony;[30]
  • a cleric who has received ordination illicitly;[31]
  • a cleric who falsely denounces before a church superior a priest as having committed the delict of soliciting, in connection with confession, to a sexual sin.[32]

Ferendae sententiae suspension (along with other punishments) is to be inflicted on any cleric who openly lives in violation of chastity[33] and on any priest who "in the act, on the occasion, or under the pretext of confession" solicits a penitent to a sexual sin.[34]

Effects

If one commits an ecclesiastical offence for which a ferendae sententiae punishment is prescribed, the penalty takes effect only when imposed by the competent ecclesiastical authority.[3] It can also happen that the ecclesiastical authority issues a declaration that a particular individual has in fact incurred a latae sententiae censure. In both these cases the effects are more severe than those of a merely automatic censure.[35]

Those under interdict or excommunication of any kind are forbidden to receive the sacraments, including the Eucharist.[36] If the excommunication has been imposed or declared, others are obliged to prevent the censured person from acting in a ministerial capacity in the liturgy or, if this proves impossible, to suspend the liturgical service;[37] and the censured person is not to be admitted to Holy Communion[38] (see canon 915).

Remission

Apart from cases where remission of a censure is reserved to the Holy See, it is for the ordinary responsible for its infliction or, after he has been consulted or in extraordinary circumstances in which such consultation is not possible, the ordinary of the locality where the censured person is present to remit a declared or imposed censure established by law.[39] However, an ordinary can remit a merely automatic censure for his subjects, wherever they are, and for anyone present in his territory or who committed the delict in his territory, and any bishop can remit merely automatic censures for anyone whose sacramental confession he is hearing.[40]

If a penitent finds it burdensome to remain in grave sin for the duration of the time necessary for obtaining remission by the competent authority from an undeclared latae sententiae excommunication or interdict that excludes the penitent from the sacraments, the confessor may immediately remit the censure in the internal sacramental forum, while requiring the penitent to have recourse within one month to the competent authority.[41]

Remission cannot be granted to someone who maintains contumacy, nor can it be denied to someone who withdraws from contumacy.[42]

References

  1. 1.Code of Canon Law, Book VIThe revised penal law of the Latin Church
  2. 2."Latae sententiae". Treccani (in Italian). Retrieved 2025-10-14.
  3. 3.[3.2]"Can. 1314". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  4. 4."Automatic censures should be eliminated from Church law". In the Light of the Law. 2015-09-26. Retrieved 2023-02-03.
  5. 5.D'Auria, Andrea (1997). L'imputabilità nel diritto penale canonico (Thesis). Roma: Ed. Pontificia università gregoriana. ISBN 8876527451.
  6. 6."Can. 1331". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  7. 7."Can. 1332". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  8. 8."Can. 1333". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  9. 9."Cann. 1321-1330". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2019-09-29.
  10. 10.Service, Catholic News (2021-06-01). "Pope promulgates revised canon law on crimes, punishments". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on June 1, 2021. Retrieved 2021-06-01.
  11. 11."Can. 1364". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  12. 12."Can the pope just fire a bishop?". The Pillar. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 2022-03-09.
  13. 13.[13.2][13.3][13.4]Miras, Jorge. "Practical Guide to Canonical Administrative Procedure in Penal Matters" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-07-03. Retrieved 14 September 2024.
  14. 14."Canon 1379 § 3" (PDF). Retrieved 28 Jan 2023.
  15. 15."Can. 1386" (PDF). Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  16. 16."Can. 1387" (PDF). Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  17. 17."Can. 1397" (PDF). Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  18. 18.Pat, McCloskey (2020-05-16). "Excommunicated for an Abortion?". Franciscan Media. Retrieved 2023-02-03.
  19. 19."The Subject Liable to Penal Sanctions (Cann. 1321 - 1330)". Code of Canon Law. The Holy See. Can. 1329. Archived from the original on 2008-12-31. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  20. 20.John Paul II. "Universi Dominici Gregis". The Holy See. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  21. 21."Declaration on Masonic Associations". The Holy See. November 26, 1983. Retrieved 2023-09-14.
  22. 22."Can. 1378". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  23. 23."Can. 1390". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  24. 24."Can. 1394". Code of Canon Law. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  25. 25."Can. 1374". Code of Canon Law.
  26. 26."Can. 1370". Code of Canon Law.
  27. 27."Can. 1378". Code of Canon Law.
  28. 28."Can. 966". Code of Canon Law.
  29. 29."Can. 976". Code of Canon Law.
  30. 30."Can. 1380". Code of Canon Law.
  31. 31."Can. 1383". Code of Canon Law.
  32. 32."Can. 1390". Code of Canon Law.
  33. 33."Can. 1395". Code of Canon Law.
  34. 34."Can. 1387". Code of Canon Law.
  35. 35.Code of Canon Law, canon 1331 §2
  36. 36.Code of Canon Law, canons 1331-1332
  37. 37."Code of Canon Law, canon 1331 §2". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2012-04-03.
  38. 38.1983 Code of Canon Law, canon 915
  39. 39."Can. 1355 §1". Code of Canon Law.
  40. 40."Can. 1355 §2". Code of Canon Law.
  41. 41."Can. 1357". Code of Canon Law.
  42. 42."Can. 1358". Code of Canon Law.