Mother of God is the dogmatic title of the Blessed Virgin Mary that confesses that Jesus Christ, whom she conceived and bore according to his humanity, is one divine person, the eternal Son of God, truly God and truly man.
Theotokos (Koine Greek: Θεοτόκος)[13] is a title of Mary, mother of Jesus, used especially in Eastern Christianity. The usual Latin translations are Dei Genitrix or Deipara (approximately "parent [fem] of God"). Common English translations are "Mother of God" or "God-bearer" – but these both have different literal equivalents in Ancient Greek: Μήτηρ Θεοῦ, and Θεοφόρος respectively.[14][15]
The title has been in use since the 3rd century, and in the 4th-century Liturgy of Saint James (4th century).[16] The Council of Ephesus in AD 431 decreed that Mary is the Theotokos because her son Jesus is both God and man: one divine person from two natures (divine and human) intimately and hypostatically united.[17][18]
The title of Mother of God (Ancient Greek: Μήτηρ (τοῦ) Θεοῦ) or Mother of Incarnate God, abbreviated ΜΡ ΘΥ (the first and last letter of main two words in Greek), is most often used in English, largely due to the lack of a satisfactory equivalent of the Greek τόκος. For the same reason, the title is often left untranslated, as Theotókos, in Eastern liturgical usage of other languages.
Theotokos is also used as the term for an Eastern icon, or type of icon, of the Mother with Child (typically called a Madonna in the Western tradition), as in "the Theotokos of Vladimir" both for the original 12th-century icon and for icons that are copies or imitate its composition.
Meaning of the title
The title Mother of God identifies Mary's Son before it magnifies Mary. A mother is mother of a person, not of an abstract nature considered in isolation. The person conceived in her womb and born at Bethlehem is the eternal Word, who assumed a complete human nature without ceasing to be God. Mary did not generate the divine nature or precede the Trinity; she truly mothered the divine person according to the humanity he received from her.
The Greek Theotokos means God-bearer or the one who gave birth to God. The Latin Dei Genetrix states the same mystery, while Mater Dei became the ordinary devotional expression. No formula implies that Mary is a goddess, a source of Christ's divinity, or mother of the Father and Holy Spirit. The title belongs inside Trinitarian and Christological grammar: the Father eternally begets the Son; Mary temporally bears that same Son in the flesh.
Divine motherhood is therefore literal and unique, yet wholly creaturely and graced. Mary's maternity supplies Christ's true human descent, body, and place within Israel. Its dignity comes entirely from the identity of her Son and from God's free election. Catholic doctrine neither reduces her to an impersonal instrument nor places her alongside God as an independent principle of salvation.
Biblical foundations
The annunciation and visitation
Luke joins Mary's motherhood directly to Jesus' divine identity. The angel announces that her child will be called Son of the Most High and Son of God, will receive David's throne, and will reign forever. Mary's question concerns the virginal manner of conception, and the answer attributes it to the Holy Spirit and the overshadowing power of the Most High. Her free assent receives a vocation already grounded in God's initiative.
Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, calls Mary the mother of my Lord. Within Luke's scriptural world, Lord bears the weight of Israel's confession of God as well as messianic authority. The unborn John responds to the presence of the unborn Christ, and Mary praises the mighty work of the covenant God. The narrative does not offer a later honor detached from Jesus; it reveals divine motherhood within the first recognition of the incarnate Lord.[1]
The Word made flesh and the woman of Galatians
John declares that the Word who was with God and was God became flesh. The subject of becoming is not a human person later adopted or inhabited by divinity. It is the eternal Word himself. When the Gospel later names Jesus' mother at Cana and Calvary, it speaks of the mother of this one incarnate subject. The title Mother of God gives concise dogmatic form to that Johannine identity.
Paul says that when the fullness of time came, God sent his Son, born of a woman and born under the law, so that humanity might receive adoption. The Son exists as Son before being born of the woman, yet his birth is real and places him within Israel. The text does not name Mary, but it supplies the apostolic pattern: divine pre-existence, human birth, redemptive mission, and filial adoption form one movement.
The Council of Ephesus
The controversy associated with Nestorius arose from the need to speak accurately about Christ. Nestorius objected to Theotokos or treated it as requiring qualification by Christotokos, Mother of Christ. Saint Cyril of Alexandria insisted that the subject born and crucified is the eternal Word made flesh. The debate involved pastoral preaching, rival theological vocabularies, imperial politics, and difficult procedures, but its doctrinal center cannot be reduced to personalities.
Ephesus in 431 received Cyril's teaching and condemned the division that would make Mary's son a human person joined externally to the Word. The council did not define that the divine nature began in Mary. It confessed that Emmanuel is truly God and that the holy Virgin is therefore Theotokos because the Word took flesh and was born from her according to the flesh. Papal reception and the later ecumenical councils secured this judgment within the Church's rule of faith.[2]
The council's proceedings were turbulent: sessions began before every delegation arrived, rival assemblies issued counter-sentences, and imperial intervention followed. Those facts belong to honest history and do not nullify the dogmatic reception of the teaching. Catholic authority attaches to the conciliar and papal act as received by the Church, not to every tactic, accusation, or political calculation surrounding the gathering.
Christotokos and Theotokos
Mary may rightly be called Mother of Christ, but the phrase becomes inadequate when used to withhold the identity confessed by Mother of God. Christ is not a third reality midway between God and man, nor a merely human messiah beside the Word. Theotokos closes the escape route by requiring the speaker to identify the child as God the Son incarnate while preserving the manner of birth according to humanity.
One divine person in two natures
Chalcedon in 451 confessed one and the same Son, perfect in divinity and perfect in humanity, consubstantial with the Father according to divinity and with humanity according to manhood. The two natures remain without confusion or change and without division or separation. The Mother of God title belongs within this definition: Mary contributes a true human nature, but the one who subsists and acts through it is the uncreated Son.[3]
Person and nature answer different questions. Nature identifies what Christ is—fully divine and fully human—while person identifies who he is—the eternal Son. There is no human person of Jesus alongside the Word. Nor is his humanity swallowed by divinity. The hypostatic union begins at conception and permanently unites complete humanity to the one divine hypostasis.[4]
This distinction makes ordinary maternal language possible without confusing levels of causality. A woman is mother of her child even though she does not cause the child's immortal soul or every future perfection. Mary is mother of the person through true generation according to his humanity; she need not be cause of the divine essence for the title to be exact. Denying the title because she did not generate divinity would apply a false theory of motherhood to every human mother.
Communication of idioms
Because one person possesses both natures, predicates rooted in either nature can be said of the person: God was born, the Lord of glory was crucified, and the Son of Man came down from heaven. The divine nature as such is not born or passible, and the human nature is not eternal or omnipotent. The communication of idioms attributes actions and experiences to the one subject without transferring properties from one nature into the other.
Divine motherhood and Mary's faith
Mary's biological motherhood cannot be separated from her obedient faith. She receives the angelic word, consents without coercion, carries Jesus, gives birth, nourishes him, presents him, searches for him, follows his mission, stands at the Cross, and prays with the apostolic Church. Grace does not replace her intelligence or freedom; it perfects a personal response within which the human motherhood of the Messiah is lived.
Vatican II presents her as both Mother and pre-eminent disciple. She advances in the pilgrimage of faith and sometimes encounters words she does not immediately comprehend. Divine motherhood does not give exhaustive earthly knowledge of the mystery or remove suffering. Simeon's prophecy, the loss in the Temple, public misunderstanding, and Calvary show a vocation matured through trust rather than a protected life without darkness.[5]
Her maternity is permanent because the Incarnation is permanent. The risen and ascended Christ does not discard the humanity born from her. Mary remains mother of the glorified Lord and, by grace, has a maternal relation to his members. This ecclesial motherhood depends wholly on Christ's unique mediation and never becomes a parallel source of adoption or divine life.[6][7]
Patristic and liturgical reception
The substance of the title precedes Ephesus. Early baptismal creeds, prayers, homilies, and defenses of the Incarnation identify the one born from Mary as the divine Word. Third- and fourth-century use of Theotokos became widespread because worship had already joined Jesus' divine identity to his real birth. The council judged a living rule of faith and supplied a boundary when disputed language threatened it.
Eastern liturgies praise Mary as Theotokos and ever-virgin throughout the Eucharistic offices, hours, and festal cycle. Byzantine iconography commonly writes the abbreviation for Mother of God beside her image, showing that the title identifies the child she presents. Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and other traditions express the same confession in their own theological and poetic languages.
The Roman Rite names the glorious ever-Virgin Mary, Mother of our God and Lord Jesus Christ, in the Roman Canon and repeatedly confesses divine motherhood in collects, prefaces, antiphons, and the Angelus. Lex orandi does not make every poetic phrase a separate definition, but the Church's stable prayer witnesses how the dogma is received: Mary is honored so that the Incarnation of her Son is proclaimed.
The Solemnity on 1 January
The General Roman Calendar celebrates the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God, on 1 January, the octave day of Christmas. Its placement keeps the title inside the Nativity rather than isolating it as an autonomous Marian claim. The liturgy contemplates the child named Jesus, the shepherds' witness, Mary's pondering heart, and the blessing of the new year under the mystery of the incarnate Son.
Relation to the other Marian dogmas
Divine motherhood supplies the christological center of Catholic Mariology. Mary's perpetual virginity concerns the singular manner and total consecration of her motherhood. The Immaculate Conception describes the grace by which she was preserved from original sin in view of Christ's merits. The Assumption completes in her body and soul the saving work of her Son. None is an unrelated privilege collected for its own sake.[8][9]
The order of dependence is decisive. Mary is immaculately conceived so that grace prepares her vocation, becomes Mother of God through virginal consent and conception, remains ever-virgin within her undivided gift, and is assumed through Christ's victory. Christ is not great because of Mary's titles; her titles are true because of who Christ is and what he accomplishes.[10]
The dogmas also illuminate the Church. The faithful receive Christ by faith, bear him through witness, are sanctified by prevenient grace, live in consecrated fidelity, and await bodily glory. Mary is not a duplicate redeemer but the first and wholly graced realization of the Church's receptive vocation under the one Redeemer.
Veneration, prayer, and images
Catholics venerate the Mother of God with hyperdulia, a unique created honor greater than that given other saints but categorically below latria, the adoration owed to God alone. The difference is not a sliding scale that almost reaches worship. Mary is a creature saved by Christ. Every authentic invocation asks her prayer or praises God's work in her; no Catholic prayer may make her an independent deity.
Icons of the Theotokos often show Mary indicating Christ, enthroning him, embracing him, or sharing the sorrow of his Passion. The image's doctrinal subject is the one incarnate Lord and the human mother from whom he took flesh. Nicaea II's distinction between image and prototype governs the honor shown: pigment is not worshiped, and the depicted person is not confused with the material object.
The Hail Mary joins Gabriel's and Elizabeth's biblical greetings to the Church's petition for prayer. The Sub tuum praesidium seeks refuge under Mary's mercy without treating her as divine providence. Marian devotion becomes disordered if it obscures Scripture, sacraments, Christ's unique mediation, or obedience to the Church. Its proper fruit is firmer confession of the Word made flesh and more faithful discipleship.
Misunderstandings and ecumenical questions
Mother of God does not mean mother of the Trinity, origin of God's being, or a woman older than the Creator. It does not teach that Christ's divinity is derived from human flesh. The title uses concrete predication about the person: the one whom Mary bore is God the Son. Adding according to the flesh explains the manner without dividing the subject.
Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrian, Catholic, and most historic Protestant traditions receive the title, although ancient Christological disputes and modern Marian practice affect its use. The Reformation confessions commonly retained Theotokos and the ancient councils even when later communities reduced Marian devotion. Recovery of the title can therefore clarify shared Christology before discussion of intercession or later definitions.[11][12]
Some contemporary language replaces Mother of God with mother of Jesus to avoid confusion. The biblical phrase is true but cannot function as a deliberate denial of the dogmatic title. Catechesis should explain rather than suppress precise terms. Conversely, devotional enthusiasm must not use Theotokos as permission for claims that detach Mary from Scripture, apostolic Tradition, or the judgment of the Magisterium.
Etymology
Theotokos is an adjectival compound of two Greek words Θεός "God" and τόκος "childbirth, parturition; offspring". A close paraphrase would be "[she] whose offspring is God" or "[she] who gave birth to one who was God".[19] The usual English translation is "Mother of God"; Latin uses Deipara or Dei Genitrix.
The Church Slavonic translation is Bogoroditsa (Russian/Serbian/Bulgarian Богородица). The full title of Mary in Slavic Orthodox tradition is Прест҃а́ѧ влⷣчица на́ша бцⷣа и҆ прⷭ҇нод҃ва мр҃і́а (Russian: Пресвятая Владычица наша Богородица и Приснодева Мария), from Greek Ὑπεραγία δέσποινα ἡμῶν Θεοτόκος καὶ ἀειπάρθενος Μαρία "Our Most Holy Lady Theotokos and Ever-Virgin Mary". German has the translation Gottesgebärerin (lit. 'bearer of God'). In Arabic, there are two main terms which are widely used at the general level, first one is: Walidatu-liilahi (Arabic: وَالِدَةُ ٱلْإِلَـٰهِ lit. 'Birther of God') and Ùmmu-'llahi (أُمُّ ٱللهِ) or Ùmmu-l'iilahi, (أُمُّ ٱلْإِلَـٰهِ), lit. 'Mother of God').
"Mother of God" is the literal translation of a distinct title in Greek, Μήτηρ τοῦ Θεοῦ (Mḗtēr toû Theoû), a term which has an established usage of its own in traditional Orthodox and Catholic theological writing, hymnography, and iconography.[20] In an abbreviated form, ΜΡ ΘΥ (Russian: М҃Р Ѳ҃Ѵ), it often is found on Eastern icons, where it is used to identify Mary. The Russian term is Матерь Божия (also Богома́терь).[21]
Variant forms are the compounds
- Θεομήτωρ: Theomḗtōr
- Μητρόθεος: Mētrótheos
- Θεογεννήτωρ: Theogennḗtōr
- Θεοκυήτωρ: Theokuḗtōr
These are found in patristic and liturgical texts.[22][23]
The theological dispute over the term concerned the term Θεός "God" versus Χριστός "Christ", and not τόκος (genitrix, "bearer") versus μήτηρ (mater, "mother"), and the two terms have been used as synonyms throughout Christian tradition. Both terms are known to have existed alongside one another since the Early Church, but it has been argued, including in modern times, that the term "Mother of God" is unduly suggestive of Godhead having its origin in Mary, imparting to Mary the role of a Mother Goddess. But this is an exact reiteration of the objection by Nestorius, resolved in the 5th century, to the effect that the term "Mother" expresses exactly the relation of Mary to the incarnate Son ascribed to Mary in Christian theology.[24][25][26][27]
Theology
Theologically, the terms "Mother of God", "Mother of Incarnate God" (and its variants) does not mean that Mary is the source of the divine nature of Jesus, who Christians believe existed with the Father from all eternity.[28][29]
Within the Orthodox and Catholic tradition, Mother of God has not been understood, nor been intended to be understood, as referring to Mary as Mother of God from eternity — that is, as Mother of God the Father — but only with reference to the birth of Jesus, that is, the Incarnation. To make it explicit, it is sometimes translated Mother of God Incarnate.[30]
The Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 affirmed the Christian faith on "one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds (æons)", that "came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, and was made man". Hence, the term affirms Jesus Christ's full divinity as God by referencing Mary as the "Mother of [that] God". In the Syriac tradition, the creed contains an addition of Theotokos after mentioning the incarnation, where it reads "...was incarnate by the Holy Spirit and of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God [Syriac: ܝܠܕܬ ܐܠܗܐ, romanized: Yāldath Alāhā or Yoldath Aloho]."
The status of Mary as Theotokos was a topic of theological dispute in the 4th and 5th centuries and was the subject of the decree of the Council of Ephesus of 431 to the effect that, in opposition to those who denied Mary the title Theotokos ("the one who gives birth to God") but called her Christotokos ("the one who gives birth to Christ"), Mary is Theotokos because her son Jesus is one person who is both God and man, divine and human.[17][18] This decree created the Nestorian Schism. Cyril of Alexandria wrote, "I am amazed that there are some who are entirely in doubt as to whether the holy Virgin should be called Theotokos or not. For if our Lord Jesus Christ is God, how is the holy Virgin who gave [Him] birth, not [Theotokos]?" (Epistle 1, to the monks of Egypt; PG 77:13B). But the argument of Nestorius was that divine and human natures of Christ were distinct, and while Mary is evidently the Christotokos (bearer of Christ), it could be misleading to describe her solely as the "bearer of God" without referencing the humanity. At issue is the interpretation of the Incarnation, and the nature of the hypostatic union of Christ's human and divine natures between Christ's conception and birth.
Within the Orthodox doctrinal teaching on the economy of salvation, Mary's identity, role, and status as Theotokos is acknowledged as indispensable. For this reason, it is formally defined as official dogma. The only other Mariological teaching so defined is that of her virginity. Both of these teachings have a bearing on the identity of Jesus Christ. By contrast, certain other Marian beliefs which do not bear directly on the doctrine concerning the person of Jesus (for example, her sinlessness, the circumstances surrounding her conception and birth, her Presentation in the Temple, her continuing virginity following the birth of Jesus, and her death), which are taught and believed by the Orthodox Church (being expressed in the Church's liturgy and patristic writings), are not formally defined by the Church.
History of use
Early Church
Originally a title of the Egyptian goddess Isis, the use of Theotokos for the Virgin Mary is first attested in the writings of Hippolytus of Rome.[31] Other early Church Fathers who used it include Ephrem the Syrian in 318,[32] Alexander I of Alexandria in 321,[33] Athanasius of Alexandria in 330,[34] Gregory the Theologian in 370, John Chrysostom in 400, and Augustine of Hippo.[35] In his Epistle to the Ephesians, Ignatius of Antioch (c. 33–108) stated that "God ... was conceived by Mary" (Greek: Ὁ θεὸς ... ἐκυοφορήθη ὑπὸ Μαρίας).[36][37]
The oldest preserved extant hymn dedicated to the Virgin Mary, Beneath thy Compassion (Greek: Ὑπὸ τὴν σὴν εὐσπλαγχνίαν, Latin: Sub tuum praesidium), has been continually prayed and sung for at least sixteen centuries. It contains the word Theotokos in the Koine Greek vocative as ΘΕΟΤΟΚΕ.[38] The oldest record of this hymn is a papyrus found in Egypt, mostly dated to after 450,[39] but according to a suggestion by Henri de Villiers possibly older, dating to the mid-3rd century.[40]
Gregory of Nazianzus (329–390) wrote:
If anyone does not confess that the Virgin Mary is Theotokos, he is found to be far from God. Whoever maintains that Christ passed through the Virgin as through a channel and was not fashioned in her in a manner at the same time divine and human—in a divine manner because [the conception occurred] without a man, in a human manner because Christ developed in her according to the principles of nature—is likewise godless. Whoever maintains that the human being was formed first, and later God descended upon him, is to be condemned.[31]
Basil of Caesarea (330–378) wrote:
According to the blameless faith of the Christians which we have obtained from God, I confess and agree that I believe in one God the Father Almighty; God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost; I adore and worship one God, the Three. I confess to the œconomy of the Son in the flesh, and that the holy Mary, who gave birth to Him according to the flesh, was Mother of God.[41]
Augustine of Hippo (354–430) wrote:
An Angel speaks to Zacharias; fertility is given to the barren; the priest comes forth dumb from the place of incense; John bursts forth into speech while yet confined within his mother's womb; an Angel blesses Mary and promises that she, a virgin, shall be the mother of the Son of God.[42]
John Cassian (360–435) wrote:
Since then you said that God was born of Mary, how can you deny that Mary was the mother of God? Since you said that God came, how can you deny that He is God who has come?[43]
And so you say, O heretic, whoever you may be, who deny that God was born of the Virgin, that Mary the Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ ought not to be called Theotokos, i.e., Mother of God, but Christotocos, i.e., only the Mother of Christ, not of God. For no one, you say, brings forth what is anterior in time. And of this utterly foolish argument whereby you think that the birth of God can be understood by carnal minds, and fancy that the mystery of His Majesty can be accounted for by human reasoning, we will, if God permits, say something later on. In the meanwhile we will now prove by Divine testimonies that Christ is God, and that Mary is the Mother of God. Hear then how the angel of God speaks to the Shepherds of the birth of God. There is born, he says, to you this day in the city of David a Saviour who is Christ the Lord. Luke 2:11 In order that you may not take Christ for a mere man, he adds the name of Lord and Saviour, on purpose that you may have no doubt that He whom you acknowledge as Saviour is God, and that (as the office of saving belongs only to Divine power) you may not question that He is of Divine power, in whom you have learned that the power to save resides.[44]
Third Ecumenical Council
The use of Theotokos was formally affirmed at the Third Ecumenical Council held at Ephesus in 431. It proclaimed that Mary truly became the Mother of God by the human conception of the Son of God in her womb:
Mother of God, not that the nature of the Word or his divinity received the beginning of its existence from the holy Virgin, but that, since the holy body, animated by a rational soul, which the Word of God united to himself according to the hypostasis, was born from her, the Word is said to be born according to the flesh.[45]
The competing view, advocated by Patriarch Nestorius of Constantinople, was that Mary should be called Christotokos, meaning "Birth-giver of Christ," to restrict her role to the mother of Christ's humanity only and not his divine nature.
Nestorius' opponents, led by Cyril of Alexandria, alleged that this view, in conjunction with Nestorius's two-nature Christology, leads to two persons in Christ, which results in an incomplete incarnation and, by extension, incomplete salvation for mankind. The council accepted Cyril's reasoning and his one-nature Christology, affirmed the title Theotokos for Mary, and anathematized Nestorianism as heresy.
In letters to Nestorius which were afterwards included among the council documents, Cyril explained his doctrine. He noted that "the holy fathers... have ventured to call the holy Virgin Theotokos, not as though the nature of the Word or his divinity received the beginning of their existence from the holy Virgin, but because from her was born his holy body, rationally endowed with a soul, with which the Word was united according to the hypostasis, and is said to have been begotten according to the flesh" (Cyril's second letter to Nestorius).
Explaining his rejection of Nestorius' preferred title for Mary (Christotokos), Cyril wrote:
Confessing the Word to be united with the flesh according to the hypostasis, we worship one Son and Lord, Jesus Christ. We do not divide him into parts and separate man and God as though they were united with each other [only] through a unity of dignity and authority... nor do we name separately Christ the Word from God, and in similar fashion, separately, another Christ from the woman, but we know only one Christ, the Word from God the Father with his own flesh... But we do not say that the Word from God dwelt as in an ordinary human born of the holy virgin... we understand that, when he became flesh, not in the same way as he is said to dwell among the saints do we distinguish the manner of the indwelling; but he was united by nature and not turned into flesh... There is, then, one Christ and Son and Lord, not with the sort of conjunction that a human being might have with God as in a unity of dignity or authority; for equality of honor does not unite natures. For Peter and John were equal to each other in honor, both of them being apostles and holy disciples, but the two were not one. Nor do we understand the manner of conjunction to be one of juxtaposition, for this is insufficient in regard to natural union.... Rather we reject the term 'conjunction' as being inadequate to express the union... [T]he holy virgin gave birth in the flesh to God united with the flesh according to hypostasis, for that reason we call her Theotokos... If anyone does not confess that Emmanuel is, in truth, God, and therefore that the holy virgin is Theotokos (for she bore in a fleshly manner the Word from God become flesh), let him be anathema. (Cyril's third letter to Nestorius)
Nestorian schism
The Church of the East, the church which existed in the Sasanian Empire, was not involved in the councils of churches within the Roman Empire, and did not participate in the Council of Ephesus. The Church of the East came to accept the teachings of Nestorius's mentor, Theodore of Mopsuestia, as official doctrine,[46] and was sometimes therefore called 'the Nestorian church', though modern scholarship has shown that this designation is theologically incorrect.[47] The Church of the East was not outright opposed to using the term 'Mother of God' (in Syriac, its predominant language, ܝܠܕܬ ܐܠܗܐ), as long as this did not lead to the confusion of Jesus' two natures; for example, Babai the Great, a prominent Church of the East cleric and theologian, wrote in his Book of the Union that "because of the union, the blessed Mary is called Mother of God (ܝܠܕܬ ܐܠܗܐ) and Mother of Man - mother of man as from her own nature, and mother of God because of the union which he had with his manhood".[48]
Reformation
Lutheran tradition retained the title of "Mother of God" (German: Mutter Gottes, Gottesmutter), a term already embraced by Martin Luther;[49] and officially confessed in the Formula of Concord (1577),[50] accepted by the Lutheran World Federation.[51]
Whilst Calvin believed that Mary was theologically speaking rightly qualified as "the mother of God", he rejected common use of this as a title, saying, "I cannot think such language either right, or becoming, or suitable. ... To call the Virgin Mary the mother of God can only serve to confirm the ignorant in their superstitions."[52]
20th century
In 1994, Pope John Paul II and Patriarch of the Assyrian Church of the East Mar Dinkha IV signed an ecumenical declaration, mutually recognizing the legitimacy of the titles "Mother of God" and "Mother of Christ." The declaration reiterates the Christological formulations of the Council of Chalcedon as a theological expression of the faith shared by both churches, at the same time respecting the preference of each Church in using these titles in their liturgical life and piety.[53]
Liturgy
Theotokos is often used in hymns to Mary in the Eastern Orthodox, Eastern Catholic and Oriental Orthodox Churches. The most common is Axion Estin (It is truly meet), which is used in nearly every service.
Other examples include Sub tuum praesidium, the Hail Mary in its Eastern form, and All creation rejoices, which replaces Axion Estin at the Divine Liturgy on the Sundays of Great Lent. Bogurodzica is a medieval Polish hymn, possibly composed by Adalbert of Prague (d. 997).
The Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God is a Roman Catholic feast day introduced in 1969, based on older traditions associating 1 January with the motherhood of Mary.[54][55][56][57]
Iconography
One of the two earliest known depictions of the Virgin Mary is found in the Catacomb of Priscilla (3rd century) showing the adoration of the Magi. Recent conservation work at the Catacombs of Priscilla revealed that what had been identified for decades as the earliest image of the Virgin and Child was actually a traditional funerary image of a Roman matron; the pointing figure with her, formerly identified as a prophet, was shown to have had its arm position adjusted and the star he was supposedly pointing to was painted in at a later date.[58] The putative Annunciation scene at Priscilla is also now recognized as a Roman matron with accompanying figure and not the Virgin Mary. Recently another third-century image of the Virgin Mary was identified at the eastern Syrian site of Dura Europos in the baptistry room of the earliest known Christian Church. The scene shows the Annunciation to the Virgin.[59]
The tradition of Marian veneration was greatly expanded only with the affirmation of her status as Theotokos in 431. The mosaics in Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, dating from 432 to 40, just after the council, does not yet show her with a halo. The iconographic tradition of the Theotokos or Madonna (Our Lady), showing the Virgin enthroned carrying the infant Christ, is established by the following century, as attested by a very small number of surviving icons, including one at Saint Catherine's Monastery in Sinai, and Salus Populi Romani, a 5th or 6th-century Byzantine icon preserved in Rome. This type of depiction, with subtly changing differences of emphasis, has remained the mainstay of depictions of Mary to the present day. The roughly half-dozen varied icons of the Virgin and Child in Rome from the 6th to 8th centuries form the majority of the representations surviving from this period, as most early Byzantine icons were destroyed in the Byzantine Iconoclasm of the 8th and 9th century,[60] notable exceptions being the 7th-century Blachernitissa and Agiosoritissa.
The iconographic tradition is well developed by the early medieval period. The tradition of Luke the Evangelist being the first to have painted Mary is established by the 8th century.[61]
An early icon of the Virgin as queen is in the church of Santa Maria in Trastevere in Rome, datable to 705–707 by the kneeling figure of Pope John VII, a notable promoter of the cult of the Virgin, to whom the infant Christ reaches his hand.
The earliest surviving image in a Western illuminated manuscript of the Madonna and Child comes from the Book of Kells of about 800 (there is a similar carved image on the lid of St Cuthbert's coffin of 698). The oldest Russian icons were imports from Byzantium, beginning in the 11th century.
Gallery
References
- 1.Saint John Paul II, Mulieris dignitatem — The Incarnation, Mary's free consent and divine motherhood, virginity and motherhood, woman and man, covenant, and Christian vocation
- 2.Council of Ephesus — Conciliar acts and letters defending the one divine person of the incarnate Word and Mary's title Theotokos against Nestorian division
- 3.Council of Chalcedon — The dogmatic definition of one and the same Son, perfect in divinity and humanity, in two natures without confusion, change, division, or separation
- 4.Catechism of the Catholic Church, 456–483 — Why the Word became flesh, true God and true man, the hypostatic union, Christ's human soul, knowledge, will, and body, and the communication of idioms
- 5.Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, chapter VIII — The Blessed Virgin Mother of God in the mystery of Christ and the Church, her faith, holiness, motherhood, Assumption, queenship, intercession, and veneration
- 6.The New American Bible — Canonical biblical texts concerning the Incarnation, the Mother of God, Mary's virginity and grace, Christ's kingdom, the woman and dragon, and the Davidic queen mother
- 7.Saint John Paul II, Redemptoris Mater — Mary's pilgrimage of faith, divine motherhood, virginity, presence in the mystery of Christ and the Church, maternal mediation, and eschatological glory
- 8.Catechism of the Catholic Church, 484–511 and 963–975 — The virgin conception, divine motherhood, perpetual virginity, holiness of Mary, and her wholly dependent maternal place in Christ and the Church
- 9.Saint Paul VI, Credo of the People of God — Authoritative profession of the Incarnation, hypostatic union, virgin conception, perpetual virginity, Immaculate Conception, Assumption, and maternal intercession
- 10.Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy — Pastoral norms for Marian feasts, titles, images, devotions, the Angelus, the Rosary, the Immaculate Conception, and the Queenship of Mary
- 11.Second Council of Constantinople — Conciliar Christology on the one hypostasis of the Word, communication of idioms, Theotokos, and Mary as ever-virgin
- 12.Saint Paul VI, Marialis cultus — Biblical, liturgical, Trinitarian, Christological, ecclesial, and ecumenical norms for sound Marian doctrine, celebration, and devotion
- 13.English pronunciation: UK: /θiˈɒtəkɒs/, US: /ˌθiːəˈtoʊkoʊs, ˌθeɪə-, -ˈtɒk-, -kəs/; Modern Greek pronunciation: [θeoˈtokos].
- 14.Schaff & Wace 1900
- 15.Bethune-Baker 1998, p. 58
- 16.Witvliet 1997; "CHURCH FATHERS: Divine Liturgy of St. James". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 2013-02-25. Retrieved 2013-11-03.
- 17.[17.2]Braaten & Jenson 2004, p. 84
- 18.[18.2]"NPNF2-14. The Seven Ecumenical Councils - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". Ccel.org. 2005-06-01. Archived from the original on 2010-06-17. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
- 19.J.F. Bethune-Baker, Nestorius and His Teachings: A Fresh Examination of the Evidence (1998), p. 58 ("who gave birth to one who was God", "whose child was God"). Pelikan, Jaroslav (1998). Mary Through the Centuries. Yale University Press. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-300-07661-5.
- 20.The Second Vatican Council stated: "Clearly from earliest times the Blessed Virgin is honoured under the title of Mother of God." Pope Paul VI, Lumen gentium, 66 Archived 2014-09-06 at the Wayback Machine
- 21.Богоматерь-Богородица Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона: в 86 т. (82 т. и 4 доп.). — СПб., 1890—1907.
- 22.On Martyrs: Speech on Simeon, Anne, at the day of the Presentation, and the Holy Theotokos. Saint Methodius of Patara (1865). Jahnius, Albert (ed.). S. Methodii Opera Et S. Methodius Platonizans (in Greek and Latin). Vol. Pars I. Halis Saxonum, C.E.M. Pfeffer. pp. 109, 110. (... [80] περιφανῶς ἡ ἱερὰ θεομήτωρ ἐξετέλει ... [109] ἐκφαντικώτατά σε τὴν θεοτόκον προσημαίνουσαν ...)
- 23.Pyrros, Dionysios (1852). Panthektē: hiera ekklēsiastikē periechousa to Pentēkostarion (in Greek). Vol. 2. p. 904. (... πῶς δῆ ἡ μητρόθεος...)
- 24."Pearson is mistaken in supposing that the resolution of the compound Theotocos into μήτηρ τοῦ Θεοῦ was unknown to the early Greek writers. It is not an open question whether Mater Dei, Dei Genitrix, Deipara, μήτηρ τοῦ Θεοῦ are proper equivalents for Θεοτόκος. This point has been settled by the unvarying use of the whole Church of God throughout all the ages from that day to this, but there is, or at least some persons have thought that there was, some question as to how Theotocos should be translated into English. Throughout this volume I have translated it 'Mother of God,' and I propose giving my reasons for considering this the only accurate translation of the word, both from a lexico-graphical and from a theological point of view."
- 25."It is evident that the word is a composite formed of Θεός God, and τίκτειν to be the mother of a child. Now I have translated the verbal part 'to be the mother of a child' because 'to bear' in English does not necessarily carry the full meaning of the Greek word, which (as Bp. Pearson has well remarked in the passage cited above) includes 'conception, nutrition, and parturition.' It has been suggested that 'God-bearer' is an exact translation. To this I object, that in the first place it is not English; and in the second that it would be an equally and, to my mind, more accurate translation of Θεοφόρος than of Θεοτόκος. Another suggestion is that it be rendered 'the bringer forth of God.' Again I object that, from a rhetorical standpoint, the expression is very open to criticism; and from a lexicographical point of view it is entirely inadequate, for while indeed the parturition does necessarily involve in the course of nature the previous conception and nutrition, it certainly does not express it. Now the word Mother does necessarily express all three of these when used in relation to her child. The reader will remember that the question I am discussing is not whether Mary can properly be called the Mother of God; this Nestorius denied and many in ancient and modern times have been found to agree with him."
- 26."It only remains to consider whether there is from a theological point of view any objection to the translation, 'Mother of God.' It is true that some persons have thought that such a rendering implied that the Godhead has its origin in Mary, but this was the very objection which Nestorius and his followers urged against the word Theotocos, and this being the case, it constitutes a strong argument in favour of the accuracy of the rendering. Of course the answer to the objection in each case is the same, it is not of the Godhead that Mary is the Mother, but of the Incarnate Son, who is God. 'Mother' expresses exactly the relation to the incarnate Son which St. Cyril, the Council of Ephesus, and all succeeding, not to say also preceding, ages of Catholics, rightly or wrongly, ascribe to Mary."
- 27.Ph. Schaff, H Wace (eds.), Early Church Fathers, Nicene and Ante-Nicene Fathers, Ser. II, Vol. XIV, "Excursus on the Word Θεοτόκος"
- 28.Father William Saunders (December 22, 1994), Mary, Mother of God, The Arlington Catholic Herald (retrieved from EWTN), archived from the original on December 13, 2018, retrieved February 19, 2007
- 29.Mary: Mother of God, Nihil obstat by Bernadeane Carr, STL; Imprimatur by Robert H. Brom, Bishop of San Diego, Catholic Answers, August 10, 2004, archived from the original on December 13, 2016{{citation}}:
- 30."We recognize the Blessed Virgin Mary as the Theotókos, the mother of God incarnate, and so observe her festivals and accord her honour among the saints." Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ by the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC II)
- 31.[31.2]Kazhdan 1991, p. 2070
- 32.E. A. Wallis Budge, M.A. "E.A.Wallis Budge, On a Fragment of a Coptic Version of Saint Ephraim's Discourse on the Transfiguration of our Lord, Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, vol. 9". catholiclibrary.org. pp. 317–327. Archived from the original on 2025-08-16. Retrieved 2025-06-14.
- 33."Alexander of Alexandria: Epistles on the Arian Heresy". www.andrews.edu.
- 34.John Henry Newman; Archibald Robertson. "CHURCH FATHERS: Discourse III Against the Arians (Athanasius)" [From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 4]. www.newadvent.org. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892.). Points 14, 29, 33 (twice) use "Theotokos" in Greek, translated here as "Bearer of God". Archived from the original on 2025-06-22. Retrieved 2025-06-14 – via Philip Schaff and Henry Wace - Revised and edited by Kevin Knight.
- 35."The rejection of the term Theotokos by Nestorius Constantinople and the refutation of his teaching by Cyril of Alexandria". Egolpion.com. 2012-06-24. Archived from the original on 2012-10-08. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
- 36.Kelly 1965, p. 143
- 37.Migne 1857, p. 660
- 38."The Oldest Hymn To the Theotokos". johnsanidopoulos.com. Archived from the original on 2 April 2023. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
- 39.G. Vannucci, Marianum, 1941 (3), pp. 97-101, "La piu antica preghiera alla Madre de Dio". P. Ryl. Gr. 3 470 Archived 2016-05-05 at the Wayback Machine (Roberts, Colin Henderson) = Le Muséon 52 (1939), p. 229-233 (Mercenier, P. F. ) = Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 74 (1952), p. 76-82 (Stegmüller, Otto). "Date: AD 450 - 799".
- 40.de Villiers, Henri (2011-02-03). "The Sub Tuum Praesidium". New Liturgical Movement. Archived from the original on 2023-08-13. Retrieved 2012-10-04..
- 41."CHURCH FATHERS: Letter 360 (St. Basil)". www.newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-29. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
- 42."CHURCH FATHERS: On the Trinity, Book II (Hilary of Poitiers)". www.newadvent.org.
- 43."CHURCH FATHERS: On the Incarnation, Book VI (John Cassian)". www.newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-10. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
- 44."CHURCH FATHERS: On the Incarnation, Book II (John Cassian)". www.newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-10. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
- 45.Catechism of the Catholic Church - Paragraph # 466. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
- 46.Baum, Wilhelm; Winkler, Dietmar W. (2003-12-08). The Church of the East: A Concise History. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-43019-2.
- 47.Brock, S. P. (1996-09). "The Nestorian Church: a lamentable misnomer". Bulletin of the John Rylands Library. 78 (3): 23–35. doi:10.7227/BJRL.78.3.3. ISSN 2054-9326.
- 48.Babai the Great, Book of the Union, 7.14. Translated: Royel, Mar Awa (2024). The Book of Union of Babai the Great: English Translation with Edited Syriac Text. Texts and Studies in Eastern Christianity Series (1st ed ed.). Boston: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-68008-1.
- 49.Basely, Joel R. (2005). Festival Sermons of Martin Luther. Dearborn, Michigan: Mark V Publiscations. p. 167. ISBN 0-9652403-1-2.
- 50.Tappert, Theodore G., "Solid Declaration, article VIII.24", The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (1959 ed.), Philadelphia: Fortress Press, p. 595
- 51."The Ecumenical Councils and Authority in and of the Church" (PDF), 7th Plenary in Sandbjerg, Denmark, The Lutheran World Federation, 10 July 1993, archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09
- 52.Calvin, John (February 1, 2007). Letters of John Calvin. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 9781556352461 – via Google Books.
- 53."Common Christological Declaration between the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East". Archived from the original on 4 January 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
- 54.The 1969 revision of the liturgical year and the calendar states: "1 January, the Octave Day of the Nativity of the Lord, is the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God, and also the commemoration of the conferral of the Most Holy Name of Jesus."
- 55.Universal Norms on the Liturgical Year and the Calendar, 35 f.
- 56.In his Apostolic Letter, Marialis Cultus, Pope Paul VI explained: "This celebration, placed on January 1 ...is meant to commemorate the part played by Mary in this mystery of salvation. It is meant also to exalt the singular dignity which this mystery brings to the 'holy Mother...through whom we were found worthy to receive the Author of life.'"
- 57."Marialis Cultus (February 2, 1974) | Paul VI". www.vatican.va. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- 58.Geri Parlby. "The Origins of Marian Art in the Catacombs and the Problems of Identification". In Chris Maunder (ed.). Origins of the Cult of the Virgin Mary. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2008, p. 41–56.
- 59.Michael Peppard. The World’s Oldest Church: Bible, Art and Ritual at Dura Europos, Syria. New Haven: Yale, 2015.
- 60.Nees, Lawrence (2002). Early medieval art. Oxford University Press. pp. 143–145, quote 144. ISBN 0-19-284243-9.
- 61.Michele Bacci. Il pennello dell'Evangelista. Storia delle immagini sacre attribuite a san Luca. Pisa: Gisem, 1998 (Italian).