Mariology

GuideMary's divine motherhood, perpetual virginity, Immaculate Conception, and Assumption are dogma; her ecclesial role is authoritatively taught, while theological titles, devotions, and historical claims retain their proper grades.
Contents

Mariology is the ordered theological study of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Sacred Scripture and Tradition, especially her relation to Jesus Christ, the Holy Trinity, the Church, grace, redemption, worship, and the Christian life.

Catholic Mariology is the systematic study of the person of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and of her place in the economy of salvation[14][15][16] in Catholic theology. According to the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception taught by the Catholic Church, Mary was conceived and born without original sin, hence she is seen as having a singular dignity above the saints, receiving a higher level of veneration than all angelic spirits and blessed souls in heaven. Catholic Mariology thus studies not only her life but also the veneration of her in daily life, prayer, hymns, art, music, and architecture in modern and ancient Christianity throughout the ages.[17][18][19][20]

The basis of Mariology are the four Marian dogmas: Mary being the Mother of God, her Immaculate Conception, her perpetual virginity, and her assumption into Heaven. However, a number of other Catholic doctrines about the Virgin Mary have been developed by reference to Sacred Scripture, theological reasoning and church tradition. The development of Mariology is ongoing and since the beginnings it has continued to be shaped by theological analyses, writings of saints, and papal statements, e.g. while all four of the dogmas are ancient in their origin, two were not defined until the 19th and 20th centuries; and papal teachings on Mary have continued to appear in recent times.[21][22][23]

In parallel to the traditional views, since the late 19th century, as Marian devotion became more pronounced in the Catholic Church, a number of other perspectives have been presented as a challenge to Catholic Mariology. Some other Christian views see Catholic Mariology as unbiblical and a denial of the uniqueness of Christ as redeemer and mediator,[24] and some modern psychological interpretations see Mary as similar to polytheistic goddesses ranging from Diana to Guan Yin.[25][26][27] Nonetheless, Christians in the Catholic Church, the Old Catholic Churches, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church, the Assyrian Church of the East, the Ancient Church of the East, the Independent Sacramental Movement, Anglo-Catholicism, and other High church Protestants continue to revere Mary as the greatest saint.

Nature and method

Mariology is not an optional devotional appendix attached after Christian doctrine is complete. The identity of Mary bears directly on the identity of Jesus: the one she conceived and bore is a divine person who truly received human nature from her. Her place in salvation history also displays the nature of grace, the Church, discipleship, virginity, motherhood, bodily destiny, and the communion of saints.

Sound Mariology begins with the Trinity and remains Christological. The Father chooses Mary in the one plan of salvation, the Son takes flesh from her, and the Holy Spirit overshadows and sanctifies her. No privilege originates independently of Christ. She is redeemed by him more perfectly, participates as a creature, and intercedes from a grace already received. Marian doctrine magnifies the Redeemer when stated correctly and distorts him when detached from these relations.[1]

The sources of Mariology are Sacred Scripture and Apostolic Tradition authentically interpreted by the Magisterium. Liturgy, patristic preaching, councils, papal definitions, the sense of the faithful, approved devotion, theology, art, and historical investigation contribute in different ways and with different authority. An apparition, private revelation, popular title, or theologian's synthesis cannot establish a dogma by itself.

Vatican II deliberately treated Mary within the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church while insisting on her inseparable relation to Christ. This placement avoids both isolation, in which Mariology becomes a self-contained system, and reduction, in which distinct Marian truths disappear into general ecclesiology. Mary is simultaneously a unique historical person and the pre-eminent realization of what the Church is called to become.

Mary in Sacred Scripture

Old Testament preparation

Catholic interpretation reads Old Testament persons, institutions, and images in their historical sense and as providential preparation for Christ and his Mother. Eve, the woman and her offspring in Genesis 3:15, the ark of the covenant, daughter Zion, queen mother, enclosed garden, and virgin who conceives all contribute to Marian typology. No single type carries the whole doctrine, and typology must not become arbitrary resemblance hunting.

Mary is understood as the New Eve because her obedient faith stands within Christ's reversal of Adam's disobedience. The comparison appears early in Justin Martyr and Irenaeus. It never places her beside Christ as an equal redeemer: he is the New Adam and head of renewed humanity; her subordinate cooperation shows how redeemed creaturely freedom truly participates in God's saving plan.[2][3]

Ark typology draws on verbal and narrative correspondences between David receiving the ark and Elizabeth receiving Mary, as well as the reality that Mary bears the incarnate Word. Daughter Zion imagery presents faithful Israel receiving the messianic king. These readings belong within the unity of Scripture and liturgy; they supplement rather than erase the literal senses of the ancient texts.

The infancy narratives

Matthew presents Mary as the virgin mother through whom Emmanuel enters Davidic history. Joseph's legal fatherhood establishes Jesus within David's line while the conception is from the Holy Spirit. The infancy narrative protects both divine initiative and genuine human birth. Mary's virginity is not contempt for marriage or body but a sign that the new creation begins by grace.

Luke offers the richest explicit Marian portrait. Gabriel greets Mary as one endowed with grace; she receives the messianic and divine-sonship announcement, asks how it will occur, and freely gives her fiat. At the Visitation, Elizabeth calls her blessed and mother of my Lord, John leaps in the womb, and Mary praises God's saving reversal in the Magnificat. Luke then repeatedly presents her keeping and pondering events in her heart.

Mary's faith is real pilgrimage, not possession of exhaustive information. Simeon's prophecy includes the sword; she and Joseph search anxiously for the child Jesus; she follows the mission whose shape exceeds ordinary expectation. Her blessedness rests first in hearing and keeping God's word, which is exactly what she does. Gospel passages that relativize biological kinship therefore confirm rather than diminish her deepest maternity.

Cana, Calvary, Pentecost, and Revelation

At Cana Mary notices need, intercedes, receives a reply that points to Jesus' hour, and tells the servants to do whatever he commands. The sign manifests Christ's glory. Marian intercession is thus radically obedient and Christ-directed: she identifies need and directs others to the Son, who acts sovereignly according to the Father's hour.

At the cross Jesus entrusts his Mother to the beloved disciple and the disciple to her. The text concerns concrete care and, within the Church's reception, reveals a maternal relation to Christ's disciples. Mary stands where the new covenant is consummated, consenting in faith and suffering with her Son without adding another sacrifice to his unique redemptive offering.

Acts places Mary prayerfully among the disciples awaiting the Holy Spirit. She is within the Church and also its exemplary praying mother, not an apostle replacing Peter or the Twelve. Revelation 12 directly portrays a woman who is Israel, mother of Messiah, and eschatological people of God; Catholic tradition can include Mary personally within this layered figure without reducing it to one referent.

Divine motherhood

Mary is Mother of God because Jesus Christ, whom she conceived and bore according to his human nature, is the eternal Son and true God. Motherhood terminates in the person, not in an abstract nature. She did not originate his divinity or exist before God; she is mother of the divine person in the genuine human generation by which he entered history.

The Council of Ephesus in 431 defended Theotokos, God-bearer or Mother of God, against a Christology that divided the incarnate Lord. The title is first a confession about Christ: the one born of Mary is the same person who is eternally begotten of the Father. Marian dogma therefore safeguards the hypostatic union and the unity of every saving act of Jesus.[4]

Divine motherhood is the root dignity from which Mary's mission and fitting privileges are understood, though not a mechanical proof of each. She is mother of the Head and maternally related to his members, yet she remains a member of the Church and a recipient of salvation. The distance between Creator and creature is never crossed by even the greatest grace.

Perpetual virginity

Before, during, and after Christ's birth

The Church confesses Mary ever virgin: she conceived Jesus without a human father by the Holy Spirit, gave birth without loss of virginal integrity, and remained virgin afterward. The doctrine concerns a bodily reality and a total consecration, not merely moral faithfulness. Its center is the unique identity and birth of Christ rather than suspicion toward marital intercourse.

Virginity before birth is explicit in Matthew and Luke and belongs to the creed. Virginity in birth confesses that Christ's miraculous birth did not violate but consecrated his Mother, while affirming a true birth rather than an appearance. Perpetual virginity after birth is received through Tradition and the Church's authoritative interpretation of biblical language.

References to Jesus' brothers and sisters do not require other children of Mary. Biblical kinship vocabulary can include close relatives, and the passion narratives distinguish other women named Mary as mothers of men called Jesus' brothers. Jesus' entrusting Mary to the beloved disciple is also difficult to reconcile with surviving natural sons obligated to care for her. These considerations support a doctrine known through the whole apostolic inheritance, not through lexical argument alone.

Theological meaning

Mary's virginity manifests divine initiative, the new creation, undivided dedication, and Christ's divine sonship. Her motherhood and virginity belong together: bodily fruitfulness comes wholly from grace without ceasing to be genuinely human. The Church likewise becomes mother through receiving the word in faith while preserving the faith intact.

The doctrine does not make ordinary marriage impure. The same Church teaches Matrimony as a sacrament and marital intercourse as honorable. Consecrated virginity and marriage illuminate one another: bodily covenant is good enough to signify Christ's union with the Church, and renunciation for the kingdom is meaningful because the good relinquished is real.

Immaculate Conception

The Immaculate Conception means that from the first instant of her conception Mary was preserved free from every stain of original sin by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ. It concerns Mary's conception by her parents, not the virginal conception of Jesus. She is fully human and fully redeemed.

Preservation is a more perfect redemption, not exemption from needing a Savior. Christ's Paschal merits are applied to Mary preventively, as a physician can save someone by preventing a fall rather than lifting the person afterward. The privilege prepares a wholly holy mother for the Incarnation while remaining a free gift, not a right generated by her nature.

Scripture presents Mary as graced, blessed among women, and the woman within Christ's victory; Tradition increasingly articulates her complete holiness and New Eve identity. Theological controversy, especially about universal redemption and the moment of sanctification, clarified the question. Blessed John Duns Scotus famously showed how preservation by anticipated merits safeguards both Mary's holiness and Christ's universal mediation.[5]

Pius IX defined the dogma in Ineffabilis Deus in 1854 after long liturgical reception, theological debate, consultation of the bishops, and maturation of the sense of the faithful. The definition includes freedom from original sin from the first instant. Mary's later freedom from personal sin belongs to Catholic teaching and her all-holy identity, while the precise grace of the definition must not be blurred into a claim that conception by her parents was virginal.[6]

Assumption

The Assumption is the dogma that, having completed the course of her earthly life, Mary was taken body and soul into heavenly glory. Pius XII defined it in Munificentissimus Deus in 1950. The wording deliberately does not define whether she died; the dominant ancient tradition celebrates her Dormition and death followed by glorification, while the dogmatic object is her complete bodily assumption.[7]

The Assumption is entirely the work of God and fruit of Christ's Resurrection. It is not the Ascension: Christ ascends by his own divine power as risen Lord, while Mary is assumed. Her privilege anticipates the bodily destiny promised to the Church and confirms that salvation perfects rather than discards embodied creation.

No biblical verse narrates the event. The dogma is known through the whole economy of revelation as received in Tradition: Mary's unique relation to Christ, freedom from sin, liturgical celebration in East and West, patristic and theological witness, and the Church's authoritative judgment. Lack of a canonical narrative does not mean lack of revealed foundation when revelation is transmitted in Scripture and Tradition together.

The Assumption does not place Mary outside final judgment as a second redeemer or make her omnipresent. She lives in the created glory of heaven through her Son and intercedes within the communion of saints. Her glorified body remains creaturely; the manner of heavenly relation to earthly petition is a mystery of God's communion, not a natural power independent of him.

Mary and the work of redemption

Free and subordinate cooperation

God alone saves, and Jesus Christ is the one Mediator whose Incarnation, obedience, sacrifice, and Resurrection reconcile humanity. Within that sovereign action, God wills real creaturely cooperation. Mary's fiat receives the Redeemer, her motherhood serves his mission, her faith perseveres to the cross, and her prayer accompanies the nascent Church. Her cooperation is unique yet wholly dependent.

Vatican II teaches that Mary cooperated through obedience, faith, hope, and burning charity in restoring supernatural life and is therefore mother in the order of grace. It immediately safeguards Christ's unique mediation: no creature can be placed on the same level as the incarnate Word. Marian participation is a sharing produced by the one source, like all Christian participation but eminent in vocation and holiness.

Expressions such as co-redemption require careful definition because the prefix can mean with rather than equal, yet ordinary hearers can easily infer parallel redeemers. No such title may contradict the sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice, and it is not a Marian dogma. The safest doctrinal language begins from Mary's subordinate cooperation and spiritual motherhood as Vatican II states them.

Spiritual motherhood and intercession

Mary's motherhood in grace flows from her motherhood of Christ and enduring union with his members. Jesus' gift at the cross, her prayer at Pentecost, and the Church's experience of her intercession support the filial relation. She does not generate sanctifying grace or replace the Holy Spirit; she prays and cares as a glorified member whose maternal vocation endures.

Calling Mary Mediatrix can be orthodox when it names her subordinate maternal intercession and participation in distributing gifts from Christ. It becomes false if it suggests a necessary independent channel between reluctant believers and a distant Savior. Christ's unique mediation is not a scarce role threatened by creaturely prayer; it is the source that enables saints to intercede at all.

Mary and the Church

Mary is a pre-eminent and wholly singular member of the Church, its type and outstanding model in faith and charity. She is not outside the Church as a parallel institution. In her the Church already appears as receptive bride, fruitful mother, holy disciple, praying community, and embodied creature destined for glory.

Her maternity illuminates the Church's maternal mission. The Church receives the Word, conceives new children through preaching and Baptism, nourishes them with sacraments, and keeps the apostolic faith in virginal integrity. The analogy never makes Mary an ordained priest or gives the Church biological motherhood. It identifies a pattern of receptive fruitfulness rooted in the Spirit.

The Assumption makes Mary an eschatological icon: what she enjoys singularly anticipates the resurrection and perfected communion promised to all Christ's members. Her holiness does not excuse passivity by others. Precisely as model she summons the faithful to receive the word, serve the needy, stand beneath the cross, pray with the Church, and hope for bodily resurrection.

Veneration and devotion

Latria, dulia, and hyperdulia

Adoration or latria belongs to the Holy Trinity alone. Saints receive dulia, honor given to God's work in his servants; Mary receives hyperdulia, a unique degree of veneration corresponding to her divine motherhood and holiness. The difference is not merely quantitative, as though enough Marian honor approached worship. Creator and creature remain categorically distinct.

Prayer to Mary means requesting her intercession, praising God's gifts in her, or addressing her within the communion of saints. She is not omniscient by nature, a goddess, or a merciful alternative to Jesus. God enables heavenly intercession, and every authentic Marian prayer terminates in Trinitarian worship through Christ. Formulae should be interpreted within this faith and corrected if used against it.

Marian liturgy includes solemnities, feasts, memorials, proper texts, hymns, antiphons, and commemorations integrated into the mystery of Christ across the year. The liturgy is the normative school of devotion: it praises God's action, names defined doctrine, reads Scripture, and never treats Mary as the final source of grace.

The Rosary, Angelus, Regina caeli, litanies, scapulars, icons, pilgrimages, and approved consecrations can form Christian memory and affection. Their value depends on sound doctrine, sacramental life, and moral conversion. Private formulas do not bind all Catholics, and a person may have deep Marian faith without adopting every approved devotion.[8]

Paul VI set enduring criteria: devotion should be biblical, liturgical, ecumenically responsible, and attentive to sound anthropology. Sentimentality, obsession with secrets, multiplication of titles, commercial exploitation, and claims that a devotion guarantees salvation without repentance corrupt Marian piety. Traditional devotion is strongest when disciplined by the Church rather than insulated from her judgment.[9]

Apparitions and private revelation

Reported Marian apparitions belong to private revelation. Even when competent authority recognizes a supernatural character or permits devotion, no apparition adds to the deposit of faith or demands the assent owed to dogma. Its role can be to recall the Gospel more urgently in a particular time. Catholics remain free not to adopt an approved apparition devotion.

Discernment examines doctrinal content, psychological and moral credibility, spiritual fruits, alleged miracles, financial interests, and obedience. A sincere visionary can be mistaken; a valid message can be mixed with interpretation; apparent fruits do not remove the need for investigation. Disobedience to legitimate authority, apocalyptic date-setting, contempt for the sacraments, or a self-sealing conspiracy mentality are grave warning signs.[10]

Lourdes and Fatima have major ecclesial reception, while many other claims remain unapproved, judged non-supernatural, or under study. Approval does not make every popular detail certain history. Mariology should distinguish the defined Immaculate Conception from Bernadette's report, or the Gospel call to conversion from disputed interpretations of Fatima secrets.

Historical development of Mariology

Second-century New Eve theology, early Marian prayer, and developing use of Theotokos show that Marian reflection arose within Christological and liturgical faith. Ephesus catalyzed popular celebration because the title protected the unity of Christ. Late antique and Byzantine hymnography developed Dormition, intercession, and all-holy themes that remain common Catholic inheritance.

The medieval West expanded Marian feasts, antiphons, the Rosary's antecedents, scholastic questions, and artistic cycles. Debate about the Immaculate Conception divided faithful schools without making either side anti-Marian; doctrinal development required resolving how universal redemption relates to preventive grace. Eastern and Western emphases often differed in idiom rather than in the core holiness confessed.

The modern period brought papal definitions of the Immaculate Conception and Assumption, major apparitions, missionary devotions, and intensive theological study. Vatican II synthesized biblical, patristic, ecclesial, and ecumenical concerns. John Paul II developed Mary's pilgrimage of faith and maternal presence; subsequent teaching has continued to encourage devotion under Christological and ecclesial discipline.[11][12]

Historical growth does not imply that every age held every proposition with equal explicitness. Development becomes credible when later teaching remains continuous with the deposit, explains earlier worship and testimony, resolves objections, and is confirmed by the Church's authoritative judgment. Claims of instant apostolic terminology are as unhelpful as claims that later definition means invention.

Ecumenical questions

Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Christians share divine motherhood, perpetual virginity, extensive liturgical veneration, intercession, and the Dormition, though they may reject Latin definitions or explanations of original sin. Their Marian piety often exceeds that of Western Christians who accuse Catholic devotion of novelty. Dialogue must distinguish common substance, differing formulations, and disagreements about papal definition.[13]

The Reformers retained more Marian doctrine than many later Protestant communities: Luther, Calvin, and classical confessions could honor Theotokos and virgin birth, while rejecting invocation and some later doctrines. Contemporary Protestant positions range widely. Catholic response should not defend genuine exaggerations, but neither should it surrender apostolic communion of saints or Marian dogma to avoid controversy.

Marian teaching is ecumenically fruitful when it points to Christ, Scripture, grace, and the Church's destiny. It becomes an obstacle when Catholics present disputed opinions as dogma or use private revelations as tests of orthodoxy. Vatican II's balance—clear doctrine, warm filial honor, and warning against excess or narrowness—provides the governing Catholic approach.

Errors and necessary distinctions

Mariolatry is not Catholic doctrine. If someone attributes divinity, independent saving power, or latria to Mary, that act is false even when clothed in Catholic vocabulary. Conversely, the existence of possible abuse does not invalidate rightful veneration any more than misunderstanding of Scripture invalidates Scripture. Reform means conforming devotion to truth, not erasing the mother given in the Gospel.

Mary's sinlessness does not make her less free or less human. Freedom reaches perfection in unhindered love of the good, not in the capacity to sin. Her fiat is genuinely personal because grace enables rather than coerces it. She could not merit the initial grace by an earlier act, yet she freely cooperated throughout life.

Divine motherhood does not imply that Mary is mother of the Trinity, source of the Son's divinity, or mother of the Father and Spirit. Spiritual motherhood does not make every poetic title precise. Assumption does not equal Ascension. Immaculate Conception does not equal virginal conception. These basic distinctions should appear wherever Mariology is taught.

A conservative Catholic Mariology is obedient before it is maximalist. It receives every dogma without embarrassment, honors approved tradition, and resists rationalist reduction. It also respects the Magisterium's distinctions, refuses to weaponize apparitions, and does not turn a favored theological title into a parallel teaching office. Full-throated devotion and doctrinal precision belong together.

Study of Mary and her place in the Catholic Church

Context and components

The study of Mary and her place in the Catholic Church has been undertaken from a number of perspectives and within a number of contexts, and in his address to the 2012 Mariological congress, Pope Benedict XVI stated that this study must be "understood and deeply examined from different and complementary viewpoints".[28] Benedict also emphasized that the study of Mary cannot be performed in isolation from other disciplines and that Mariology is inherently related to the study of Christ and of the church, and expresses the inner coherence of these disciplines.[29]

Pope Benedict XVI has stated that Marian studies have three separate characteristics: first personalizing the church so it is not seen just as a structure but as a person, secondly the incarnational aspect and the relation to God, and third Marian piety which involves the heart and the emotional component.[30]

Mary's position in the church can be compared to the aspect of the Petrine office in a dual sense.[31] This perspective on the duality of the roles of Mary and Peter highlights the subjective holiness of the heart and the holiness of the structure of the church. In this duality, the Petrine office logically examines the charisms for their theological soundness, while the Marian dual provides a balance in the spiritual and emotional sense via the service of love that the office can never encompass. Mariology and the doctrine of office are thus not "side chapels" in Catholic teachings, but are central and integrating elements of it.[32] As referenced in Pope Pius XII's 1943 the encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi, her fiat gave consent for a spiritual marriage between the Son of God and human nature, thus giving humanity the means to salvation. Mary's rights (wedding feast at Cana), and Mary's love (fiat) are essential to salvation.

Maximalism and minimalism

Mariology is a field in which deeply felt pious beliefs of the faithful and hagiography may conflict with theological and critical historical reviews of beliefs and practices.[33] This conflict was recognized as early as the year 1300 by William of Ware who described the tendency of some believers to attribute almost everything to Mary.[34] Bonaventura warned against Marian maximalism: "One has to be careful as to not to minimize the honour of our Lord, Jesus Christ."[35] Both minimalist and maximalist have always seen in Mary a sign of the Catholic Church and viewed her as a model for all Catholics.[36]

In the 20th century, Pope Pius XII, "the most Marian pope in Church history",[37] warned against both exuberant exaggerations and timid minimalism in the presentation of Mary.[38][39] The Vatican II dogmatic constitution Lumen gentium was specifically written in 1964 to avoid both Marian maximalism and minimalism.[40][41] Pope John Paul II was also careful to avoid both maximalism and minimalism in his Mariology and avoided taking personal positions on issues which were subject to theological debate.[42]

Mariology and Christology

Mariology is related to Christology (the study of Christ) and in the Catholic theological and papal writings has been viewed as interwoven with the mystery of Christ.[43] Pope John Paul II discussed the "precise place of Mary" in the plan of salvation in the encyclical Redemptoris Mater and stated: "Following the line of the Second Vatican Council, I wish to emphasize the special presence of the Mother of God in the mystery of Christ and his Church. For this is a fundamental dimension emerging from the Mariology of the Council".[44]

Catholic theologians have also explored the necessary connection of Mariology with Christology.[43] According to John Henry Newman: "Mariology is always christocentric".[45][46] Pope Benedict XVI characterized the relationship by stating that "Christology and Mariology are inseparably interwoven" from their very beginnings.[47] In his view, Mariology underscores the nexus of the mysteries of Christology and ecclesiology, and reflects they are intrinsically interwoven.[48]

Early Christians and numerous saints focused on this connection[49] and popes highlighted the inner link between Marian doctrines and a fuller understanding of Christological themes.[50] Given the Catholic perspective that the Church lives in its relation to Christ, being the Body of Christ, it also has a relation to his mother, whose study is the subject of Catholic Mariology.[51] Pope Pius X in Ad diem illum stated: "there is no more direct road than by Mary for uniting all mankind in Christ."[52]

In Catholic theology the study of Mary, while contributing to the study of Christ, is also a separate discipline in its own right, with an understanding of the figure of Mary contributing to a fuller understanding of who Christ is and what he did.[53] The Congregation for Catholic Education has characterized the situation as follows: "The history of theology shows that an understanding of the mystery of the Virgin contributes to a more profound understanding of the mystery of Christ, of the Church and of the vocation of man."[54] Referring to this, Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke stated that the promotion of a fuller knowledge of the Virgin Mary is the "constant work of the Church".[55]

History and development

Early Christians focused their piety at first more upon the martyrs; but following that, they saw in Mary a bridge between the old and the new.[56] The earliest recorded prayer to Mary, the Sub tuum praesidium, is dated to around the year 250.[57]

In Egypt the veneration of Mary had started in the 3rd century and the term Theotokos was used by Church Father Origen.[58]

The Renaissance period witnessed a dramatic growth in Marian art.[59] Masterpieces by Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael were produced in this period. In the 16th century, the Council of Trent confirmed the Catholic tradition of paintings and artworks in churches, resulting in a great development of Marian art and Mariology during the Baroque Period.[20] During the Reformation, the Catholic Church defended its Mariology against Protestant views. With the victory at Battle of Lepanto (1571) accredited to her, it "signified the beginning of a strong resurgence of Marian devotions."[60] The baroque literature on Mary experienced unforeseen growth. More than 500 pages of Mariological writings were published during the 17th century alone.[61]

Popes have fostered the veneration of the Blessed Virgin through the promotion of Marian devotions, feast days, prayers, initiatives, the acceptance and support of Marian congregations, and, the formal recognition of Marian apparitions such as in Lourdes and Fátima. Popes Alexander VII and Clement X both promulgated the veneration of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, a concept which was embraced by Pope John Paul II in the 20th century as the Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary.[62][63][64][65]

The two Marian dogmas of Immaculate Conception and Assumption were established by popes in the 19th and 20th century. Pope Pius XII issued the Dogma of the Assumption and the Second Vatican Council declared Mary to be the Mother of the Church.[66] In his 2002 Apostolic Letter Rosarium Virginis Mariæ, Pope John Paul II emphasized Louis de Montfort's approach of viewing the study of Mary as a path to gaining a better understanding of the mystery of Christ.[67] This is consistent with the emphasis of the bishops at the Second Vatican Council in not having a separate decree on Mary but rather describing her place in salvation history in Lumen gentium, the Constitution on the Church.[68]

Dogmatic teachings

Marian Catholic dogmas present Catholic teachings about Mary and her relation to Jesus Christ, held by the church to be infallible, and reflect the role of Mary in the economy of salvation.[69][70]

De Fide Definita or De Fide Credenda doctrines have the highest degree of dogmatic certainty. These doctrines come in several forms, namely the sacred scriptures and apostolic tradition[71] and teachings which have been specifically defined as revealed by an extraordinary definition by a pope or ecumenical council (extraordinary universal Magisterium), or those teachings infallibly taught to be revealed by the ordinary universal Magisterium. As in the case of the Immaculate Conception or the Assumption, these doctrines were held by the church prior to the date of official definition, but open for discussion. From the date of definition, they must be accepted by all members of the Catholic Church as contained specifically in the Deposit of Faith and owed supernatural faith in itself (de fide credenda).[69][70]

There are four Marian dogmas specifically defined by the Magisterium among a large number of other dogmas and doctrines about the Virgin Mary – for example, the Annunciation of Mary is dogma because it is in the scriptures, but it has not been formally defined by the Magisterium. These four Marian dogmas include:

NameFirst magisterial definitionSubstance of the dogma
Mother of GodCouncil of Ephesus (431)Mother of God, not that the nature of the Word or his divinity received the beginning of its existence from the holy Virgin, but that, since the holy body, animated by a rational soul, which the Word of God united to himself according to the hypostasis, was born from her, the Word is said to be born according to the flesh.
Perpetual virginitySecond Council of Constantinople (553) and Lateran Synod (649)'Perpetual virginity of Mary', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth.
Immaculate ConceptionPope Pius IX (1854)Mary, at her conception, was preserved immaculate from Original Sin.
Assumption into heavenPope Pius XII (1950)Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.

Mother of God

Mary's motherhood of God (Deipara in Latin) is a dogma of the Catholic Church.[72] The term "Mother of God" appears within the oldest known prayer to Mary, the Sub tuum praesidium, which dates to around 250 AD: "Under thy protection we seek refuge, Holy Mother of God". This was the first specifically Marian doctrine to be formally defined by the church, formally affirmed at the Third Ecumenical Council held at Ephesus in 431. This refuted the objection raised by Patriarch Nestorius of Constantinople.[73]

Scriptural basis for the dogma is found in John 1:14 which states "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us" and in Galatians 4:4 which states "God sent forth his Son, born of a woman, born under the law".[74] Luke 1:35 further affirms divine maternity by stating: "The holy Spirit will come upon you. ... Therefore, the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God."[75]

The dogmatic constitution Lumen gentium at the Second Vatican Council affirmed Mary as the Mother of God. "The Virgin Mary, who at the message of the angel received the Word of God in her heart and in her body and gave Life to the world, is acknowledged and honored as being truly the Mother of God and Mother of the Redeemer."[76]

This dogma is inherently related to the Christological dogma of the hypostatic union which relates the divine and human natures of Jesus Christ.[72] The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "Mary is truly 'Mother of God' since she is the mother of the eternal Son of God made man, who is God himself."[77] Sourced in the John 1:1–14, Mary did not create the divine person of Jesus, who existed with the Father from all eternity.[73]

Assumption of Mary

This dogma states that Mary was assumed into heaven with body and soul. The Catechism (item 966) states:

The Immaculate Virgin, preserved free from all stain of original sin, when the course of her earthly life was finished, was taken up body and soul into heavenly glory, and exalted by the Lord as Queen over all things.[78]

Pope Pius XII discussed the Assumption in Deiparae Virginis Mariae (1946) and declared it a dogma in Munificentissimus Deus (1950).[79][80][81]

Although the Assumption was only recently defined as dogma, accounts of the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven have circulated since at least the 5th century, and by the 8th century Andrew of Crete and John of Damascus had declared belief in it.[82][83] The Book of Revelation (12:1) has been interpreted as referring to it; with her coronation implying her previous bodily assumption to heaven.[79]

Before declaring the Assumption a dogma in Munificentissimus Deus in 1950, in the encyclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae (1946) Pope Pius XII obtained the opinion of Catholic bishops, and based on their overwhelming support (1210 among the 1232 bishops) proceeded with the dogmatic definition.[79][84] The consensus of Magisterial teaching and liturgy affirms that Mary suffered death before her assumption, but this is not always accepted as settled doctrine. What is most clear is that her body was not left on earth to corrupt.[85][86]

When responding to Pope Pius XII following the circulation of Deiparae Virginis Mariae, a large number of Catholic bishops pointed to the Book of Genesis (3:15) as a scriptural basis.[82] In Munificentissimus Deus (item 39) Pius XII referred to the "struggle against the infernal foe" as in Genesis 3:15 and to "complete victory over the sin and death" as in the Letters of Paul as a scriptural basis for the dogmatic definition, Mary being assumed into heaven also seems to verify 1 Corinthians 15:54: "Then shall come to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory".[82][87][88]

Immaculate Conception of Mary

This dogma states that Mary was conceived without original sin. This means that from the first moment of her existence she was preserved by God from the lack of sanctifying grace, and that she was instead filled with divine grace.[89]

The dogma of the Immaculate Conception is distinct from and should not be confused with the perpetual virginity of Mary or the virgin birth of Jesus; for this dogma refers to the conception of Mary by her mother, Saint Anne, and not the conception of Jesus.

The feast of the Immaculate Conception, celebrated on December 8, was established in 1476 by Pope Sixtus IV, but the dogmatic definition came from Pope Pius IX in his constitution Ineffabilis Deus, on December 8, 1854.[89][90][91]

The dogma states that Mary possessed sanctifying grace from the first instant of her existence and by a special and unique gift of God was free from the lack of grace caused by the original sin from the beginning of human history.[92] In Fulgens corona (item 10) Pope Pius XII reaffirmed the concept by stating: "Who will dare to doubt that she, who was purer than the angels and at all times pure, was at any moment, even for the briefest instant, not free from every stain of sin?"[93]

Ineffabilis Deus (as well as Pope Pius XII's Munificentissimus Deus on the Assumption) also teaches the predestination of Mary, in that she was preserved from sin due to the role reserved for her in the economy of salvation.[90] This predetermination of Mary's role in salvation was referred to in Lumen gentium (item 61) which stated that she was "Predestined from eternity by that decree of divine providence which determined the incarnation of the Word to be the Mother of God."[90][41] The definition in Ineffabilis Deus confirms the uniqueness of the Immaculate Conception as a gift from God to Mary, that Jesus might receive his body from one unstained by sin.[89]

Perpetual virginity of Mary

This dogma states that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth (de fide). This oldest Marian doctrine, (also held by Lutheran, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox, and many other Christians) affirms Mary's "real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man."[94] Thus, by the teaching of this dogma, the faithful believe that Mary was ever-Virgin (Greek ἀειπάρθενος) for the whole of her life, making Jesus her only biological son, whose conception and birth are held to be miraculous.[95][96]

The doctrine of perpetual virginity is distinct from the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary, which relates to the conception of the Virgin Mary herself without any stain (macula in Latin) of original sin.[97]

Virginity before birth

This means that Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit without participation of any man (de fide). The Greek term Aeiparthenos (i.e. "Ever Virgin") is attested to from the early 4th century.[98] The Catechism of the Catholic Church (item 499) includes the term Aeiparthenos and referring to the dogmatic constitution Lumen gentium (item 57) states: "Christ's birth did not diminish his mother's virginal integrity but sanctified it."[99][100][101]

Virginity during birth

This means that Mary gave birth without losing her corporal virginity (de fide) and her corporal integrity was not affected by giving birth.[100] The Catholic Church does not teach how this occurred physically, but insists that virginity during child birth is different from virginity of conception.[100]

Virginity after birth

This means that Mary remained a virgin after giving birth (de fide).[100] This belief of the church was questioned in its early years.[102] The scriptures say little about this, mentioning the brothers of Jesus, but never "sons of Mary", suggesting to the patristic writers a broader family relationship.[100][102][103]

Other Marian doctrines

Apart from the four Marian dogmas listed above, the Catholic Church holds a number of other doctrines about the Virgin Mary which have been developed by references to Sacred Scripture, theological reasoning and church tradition.[104]

Queen of Heaven

The doctrine that the Virgin Mary has been crowned Queen of Heaven goes back to certain early patristic writers of the church such as Gregory Nazianzen's "the Mother of the King of the universe", and the "Virgin Mother who brought forth the King of the whole world",[105] Prudentius's the Mother marvels "that she has brought forth God as man, and even as Supreme King."[106] and, Ephrem's, "Let Heaven sustain me in its embrace, because I am honored above it. For heaven was not Thy mother, but Thou hast made it Thy throne. How much more honorable and venerable than the throne of a king is her mother."[107] The Catholic Church often sees Mary as queen in heaven, bearing a crown of twelve stars in Revelation.[108]

Many popes have given tribute to Mary in this regard, for example: Mary is the Queen of Heaven and Earth, (Pius IX), Queen and Ruler of the Universe (Leo XIII) and Queen of the World (Pius XII)[109] The theological and logical foundation of these titles rests in the dogma of Mary as the Mother of God. As mother of God, she participates in his salvation plan. The Catholic faith teaches that Mary, the Virgin Mother of God, reigns with a mother's solicitude over the entire world, just as she is crowned in heavenly blessedness with the glory of a Queen, as Pius XII wrote:[110]

Certainly, in the full and strict meaning of the term, only Jesus Christ, the God-Man, is King; but Mary, too, as Mother of the divine Christ, as His associate in the redemption, in his struggle with His enemies and His final victory over them, has a share, though in a limited and analogous way, in His royal dignity. For from her union with Christ she attains a radiant eminence transcending that of any other creature; from her union with Christ she receives the royal right to dispose of the treasures of the Divine Redeemer's Kingdom; from her union with Christ finally is derived the inexhaustible efficacy of her maternal intercession before the Son and His Father.[110]

Mary as Mother of the Church

The title Mother of the Church (in Latin Mater Ecclesiae) was officially given to the Virgin Mary during the Second Vatican Council by Pope Paul VI.[111] This title goes back to Ambrose of Milan in the 4th century, but this use was not known until its 1944 rediscovery by Hugo Rahner.[111][112] Rahner's Mariology, following Ambrose, saw Mary in her role within the church, his interpretation being based solely on Ambrose and the early Fathers.[112]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that the Virgin Mary is mother of the church and of all its members, namely all Christians:[113]

The Virgin Mary ... is acknowledged and honoured as being truly the Mother of God and of the redeemer. ... since she has by her charity joined in bringing about the birth of believers in the Church, who are members of its head. ... Mary, Mother of Christ, Mother of the Church.

Pope Paul VI's Credo of the People of God states:[114][115]

The Mother of the Church, carries on in heaven her maternal role with regard to the members of Christ, cooperating in the birth and development of divine life in the souls of the redeemed.

In Redemptoris Mater Pope John Paul II referred to Paul VI's "Credo of the People of God" as a reaffirmation of the statement that Mary is the "mother of the entire Christian people, both faithful and pastors" and wrote that the Credo "restated this truth in an even more forceful way":[114]

Pope Benedict XVI also referred to the Credo of Paul VI and stated that it sums up all of the scriptural texts that relate to the matter.[115]

In his homily on 2015 New Year's Day, Pope Francis said that Jesus and his mother Mary are "inseparable", just like Jesus and the church. Mary is "the Mother of the Church, and through the Church, the mother of all men and women, and of every people".[116]

Mediatrix

In Catholic teachings, Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and man.[117] He alone reconciled through his death on the Cross creator and creation. But this does not exclude a secondary mediating role for Mary, preparatory, supportive; in the view of several prominent, but not all, Catholics. The teaching that Mary intercedes for all believers and especially those who request her intercession through prayer has been held in the church since early times; for example, by Ephraim, the Syrian: "after the mediator a mediatrix for the whole world.[118] Mediation is something that can be said of all the heavenly saints, but Mary is seen as having the greatest power of mediation. The earliest surviving recorded prayer to Mary is the Sub tuum praesidium, written in Greek.

Mary has increasingly been seen as a principal dispenser of God's graces and Advocate for the people of God and is mentioned as such in several official church documents. Pope Pius IX used the title in Ineffabilis Deus. In the first of his so-called "Rosary encyclicals", Supremi apostolatus officio (1883), Pope Leo XIII calls Our Lady "the guardian of our peace and the dispensatrix of heavenly graces". The following year, 1884, his encyclical Superiore anno speaks of the prayers presented to God "through her whom He has chosen to be the dispenser of all heavenly graces". Pope Pius X employed this title in Ad diem illum in 1904, Pope Benedict XV introduced it into the Marian liturgy when he created the Marian feast of Mary, Mediatrix of all Graces in 1921, In his 1954 encyclical Ad caeli reginam, Pope Pius XII calls Mary the Mediatrix of peace.[119]

A lay movement called Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici promotes the doctrine of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate.[120][121] Co-Redemptrix refers to the participation of Mary in the salvation process. Irenaeus, the Church Father (died 200), referred to Mary as "causa salutis" [cause of our salvation] given her "fiat".[122] It is a way of speaking which has been considered since the 15th century,[123] but "Pope Francis appeared to flatly reject proposals in some theological circles to add 'co-redemptrix' to the list of titles of the Virgin Mary, saying the mother of Jesus never took anything that belonged to her son, and calling the invention of new titles and dogmas 'foolishness'."[124]

The decree Lumen gentium of Vatican II cautioned about using the title of "Mediatrix", saying that: "this, however, is to be so understood that it neither takes away from nor adds anything to the dignity and efficaciousness of Christ the one Mediator".[125] A Mariological Congress held in Częstochowa, Poland, in August 1996 determined that it was not opportune to use this title of Mary for, as pointed out at Vatican II, it has its limits and can be misunderstood.[126]

Encyclicals

Popes have been important in shaping both the theological and the devotional aspects of the Catholic perspective on the Virgin Mary.[127] Theologically, popes have highlighted the inner link between the Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ, in the encyclicals Mystici corporis[128] and Redemptoris Mater.[129]

Marian devotions from sacred tradition

Marian devotions are highly prominent within the Catholic tradition and a wide variety of devotions ranging from Consecration to Mary, to the wearing of Scapulars, to First Saturdays, to multi-day prayers such as Rosary, Angelus & Novenas are practiced by Catholics.[130][131][132][133]

The spread of Marian devotions, such as the Rosary via lay organizations, has also influenced popular interest in Mariology.[134] Marian devotions generally begin at the level of popular piety, often in connection with the religious experiences and visions of simple and modest individuals (in some cases children), and the recounting of their experiences in time creates strong emotions among numerous Catholics.[135][136]

Theologians have at times cited in support of their Mariology the constant sensus fidelium, e.g., Alphonsus Liguori valued texts and traditions of the Church Fathers as expressions of the sensus fidelium of the past and attributed great weight to the argument that "the greater part of the faithful have always had recourse to the intercession of the divine mother for all the graces which they desire".[137] Speaking of the witness of the Church Fathers in attributing certain titles to Mary, in Fulgens corona Pope Pius XII wrote:

If the popular praises of the Blessed Virgin Mary be given the careful consideration they deserve, who will dare to doubt that she, who was purer than the angels and at all times pure, was at any moment, even for the briefest instant, not free from every stain of sin?[138]

The Marian dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary were defined in part on the basis of the sensus fidei, "the supernatural appreciation of faith on the part of the whole people, when, from the bishops to the last of the faithful, they manifest a universal consent in matters of faith and morals".[139] In the case of the dogmas of Immaculate Conception and Assumption, the two popes concerned consulted the Catholic bishops worldwide about the faith of the community before proceeding to define the dogma.[140]

Referring to these dogmas, in 2010 Pope Benedict XVI called the People of God the "teacher that goes first" and stated:

Faith both in the Immaculate Conception and in the bodily Assumption of the Virgin was already present in the People of God, while theology had not yet found the key to interpreting it in the totality of the doctrine of the faith. The People of God therefore precede theologians and this is all thanks to that supernatural sensus fidei, namely, that capacity infused by the Holy Spirit that qualifies us to embrace the reality of the faith with humility of heart and mind. In this sense, the People of God is the "teacher that goes first" and must then be more deeply examined and intellectually accepted by theology.[141]

Marian devotions have been encouraged by popes, and in Marialis cultus Pope Paul VI stated: "From the moment when we were called to the See of Peter, we have constantly striven to enhance devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.[142] In Rosarium Virginis Mariae, Pope John Paul II stated: "Among all devotions that which most consecrates and conforms a soul to our Lord is devotion to Mary.[143]

Devotion to the Virgin Mary does not, however, amount to worship – which is reserved for God; Catholics view Mary as subordinate to Christ, but uniquely so, in that she is seen as above all other creatures. In 787 the Second Council of Nicaea affirmed a three-level hierarchy of latria, hyperdulia and dulia that applies to God, the Virgin Mary and then to the other saints.[144][145][146]

Marian processions

In Los Angeles, California, a Marian procession took place annually for roughly the first 100 years following the founding of the city. In an attempt to revive the custom of religious processions, in September 2011 the Queen of Angels Foundation inaugurated an annual "Grand Marian Procession" in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles' historic core. [147] This yearly procession, intended to coincide with the anniversary of the founding of the City of Los Angeles, begins outside of the parish of La Iglesia de Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles which is part of the Los Angeles Plaza Historic District, better known as "La Placita". By way of city streets, the procession eventually terminates at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels where a public Rosary and Mass in honour of the Blessed Virgin Mary are offered. [148] Subsequent years have seen the involvement and participation of numerous chivalric, fraternal, and religious orders, parishes, lay groups, political figures, as well as other religious and civic organizations.

Differing perspectives

Throughout the centuries, Catholics have viewed the Virgin Mary from a number of perspectives, at times derived from specific Marian attributes ranging from queenship to humility and at other times based on cultural preferences of events taking place at specific points in history.[149][150] In parallel with the traditional approaches to Mariology, opposing views based on progressive interpretations have been presented by feminists, psychologists and liberal Catholics.[151][152]

Traditional views

Traditional views on Mary have emphasized the Marian dogmas and doctrines, accompanied by devotions and venerations. Some of these views have changed and been transformed over time.

An example of the changing perspectives on the Virgin Mary based on specific spiritual views, and its adoption within a culture a world away, is the transformation of the image of Mary from a Heavenly Queen to a mother of humility, and the construction of views to accommodate both perspectives. While depictions of the Virgin Mary as the Queen of Heaven or Coronation of the Virgin by artists such as Paolo Veneziano or Giuliano da Rimini were common in the early part of the 14th century, they did not fit with the virtue of humility which was a key tenet of the spirituality of Francis of Assisi. The concept of the Virgin of humility was developed in the 14th century in order to accommodate Franciscan piety, by depicting the Madonna sitting on the ground, rather than on a throne. It offered a view of the Virgin Mary (often barefoot) as a mother nursing a child, rather than a Queen in a coronation scene.[153][154][155]

As the Franciscans began to preach in China, the notion of the Virgin of humility resonated well with the Chinese, partly due to the cultural acceptance of humility as a virtue in China, and partly due to its similarity to the motherly, merciful figure of Kuanyin, which was much admired in south China.[156][157][158] However, by the middle of the 15th century, a dual view had emerged in Europe, as represented by Domenico di Bartolo's 1433 Madonna of humility which expressed the symbolic duality of her nature: an earthly barefoot woman, as well as a heavenly queen. Despite her low, sitting position, the depiction of stars, and the gems, as well as a halo, signify the regal status of the Virgin, as she is being attended to while she holds the Child Jesus.[159]

Juan Diego's account of the appearance of the Virgin of Guadalupe to him in 1531 on Tepeyac Hill in Mexico provides another example of the cultural adaptation of the view of the Virgin Mary. Juan Diego did not describe the Virgin Mary as either European or Middle Eastern, but as a tanned Aztec princess who spoke in his local Nahuatl language, and not in Spanish. The image of the Virgin of Guadalupe that is highly venerated in Mexico has the appearance of an Indigenous Central American, rather than a European woman, and the clothing of the Virgin of Guadalupe has been identified as that of an Aztec princess. The Virgin of Guadalupe was a turning point in the conversion of Latin America to Catholicism, and is the primary view of Mary among millions of Catholics in Mexico in the 21st century.[160][161][162] Pope John Paul II reinforced the localization of this view by permitting local Aztec dances during the ceremony in which he declared Juan Diego a saint, spoke in Nahuatl as part of the ceremony, called Juan Diego "the talking eagle", and asked him to show "the way that leads to the Dark Virgin of Tepeyac".[161][163][164]

The view of the Virgin Mary as a "miracle worker" has existed for centuries and is still held by many Catholics in the 21st century.[165][166] The legends of the miracles of the Maddona of Orsanmichele in Florence go back to the Renaissance.[167] The legends of miracles performed by the image of the Black Madonna of Częstochowa also go back for centuries, and it continues to be venerated today as the Patron of Poland.[168][169] Every year, millions of Catholic pilgrims visit the Basilica at Our Lady of Lourdes in search of miraculous cures.[170][171] Although millions of Catholics hope for miracles on their pilgrimages, the Vatican has generally been reluctant to approve of modern miracles, unless they have been subject to extensive analysis.[172]

Liberal perspectives

Since the end of the 19th century, a number of progressive and liberal perspectives of Mariology have been presented, ranging from feminist criticisms to interpretations based on modern psychology and liberal Catholic viewpoints. These views are generally critical of the Catholic approach to Mariology as well as the Eastern Orthodox Church, which has even more Marian emphasis within its official liturgy.[151][152][173]

Some feminists contend that, as with other women saints such as Joan of Arc, the image of Mary is a construct of the patriarchal mind. They argue that Marian dogmas and doctrines and the typical forms of Marian devotion reinforce patriarchy by offering women temporary comfort from the ongoing oppression inflicted on them by male dominated churches and societies.[152] In the feminist view, old gender stereotypes persist within traditional Marian teachings and theological doctrines. To that end books on feminist Mariology have been published to present opposing interpretations and perspectives.[25]

The psychological analysis of Marian teachings dates back to Sigmund Freud, who used the title of a poem by Goethe in his 1911 paper Great is Diana of the Ephesians.[26] Carl Jung, on the other hand, viewed the Virgin Mary as a spiritual and more loving goddess version of Eros.[174] A large number of other psychological interpretations have been presented through the years, ranging from the study of the similarities of the Virgin Mary and the Buddhist goddess Tara, or the humble and loving figure presented by the East Asian goddess Kwan Yin.[27]

Since the Reformation many Christians have opposed Marian venerations, and that trend has continued into the 21st century among progressive and liberal Christians, who see the high level of attention paid to the Virgin Mary both as being without sufficient grounding in Scripture and as distracting from the worship that is due to Christ.[24][175]

Groups of liberal Catholics view the traditional image of the Virgin Mary as presented by the Catholic Church as an obstacle towards realization of the goal of womanhood, and as a symbol of the systemic patriarchal oppression of women within the church. Moreover, some liberal Catholics view the cultivation of the traditional image of Mary as a method of manipulation of Catholics at large by the church hierarchy.[176] Other liberal Christians argue that the modern concepts of equal opportunity for men and women does not resonate well with the humble image of Mary, obediently and subserviently kneeling before Christ.[177]

Eastern Catholic differences from Latin Church

Eastern Catholics, part of the Catholic Church like those in the Latin Church, sometimes differ in Marian theology from Latin Catholics.

Assumption of Mary

The traditional Eastern expression of this doctrine is the Dormition of the Theotokos which emphasizes her falling asleep to be later assumed into heaven. The differences in these observances is for some Eastern Catholics superficial.[178] However, Latin Catholics in general disagree with this eastern understanding.[179] Notably, in the Coptic tradition, followed by Coptic Catholics and Coptic Orthodox, the Dormition and the Assumption of St Mary are observed at different times of year.[180]

Immaculate Conception

The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is a teaching of Eastern origin but expressed in the terminology of the Western Church.[181] The Western concept of the Virgin Mary being free from original sin as defined by Augustine of Hippo is not accepted in the East. However, Eastern Catholics recognized from ancient times that Mary was preserved by God from the contagion of original sin. Eastern Catholics – while not observing the holy day as it appears on the General Roman Calendar – affirm it and sometimes dedicate churches to the Virgin Mary under this title.[182]

Centers for Mariological studies

The formal study of Mariology within the circles associated with the Holy See took a major step forward between the Holy Year 1950 and 1958 based on the actions of Pope Pius XII, who authorized institutions for increased academic research into the veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

  • Pontifical Marian International Academy Archived 2014-07-29 at the Wayback Machine – The PAMI is an international pontifical organization connecting all Promoters of Mariology, Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants and Muslim. John XXIII with the Apostolic Letter Maiora in Dies defined the purpose of the PAMI: to promote and animate studies of Mariology through International Mariological Marian Congresses and other academic meetings and to see to the publication of their studies. The PAMI has the task of coordinating the other Marian Academies and Societies that exist all over the world and to exercise vigilance against any Marian excess or minimalism. For this reason the Pope determined that in the academy there be a Council that assures the organization of Congresses and the coordination of the Mariological Societies, Promoters and Teachers of Mariology.
  • Academia Mariana Salesiana – He allowed the foundation of the Academia Mariana Salesiana, which is a part of a papal university. The academy supports Salesian studies to further the veneration of the Blessed Virgin in the tradition of John Bosco.[183]
  • Centro Mariano Montfortano – Also in 1950, the Centro Mariano Montfortano was moved from Bergamo to Rome. The Centro promulgates the teachings of Louis de Montfort, who was earlier canonized by Pius XII. It publishes the monthly Madre e Regina, which promulgates the Marian orientation of Montfort.[184]
  • Marianum Archived 2023-05-11 at the Wayback Machine was created in 1950 and entrusted to the Order of Servites. It is authorized to grant all academic degrees, including a doctorate in theology. Since 1976, every two years the Marianum organizes international conferences to find modern formulations which approximate the mystery of Mary.[184]
  • Collegamento Mariano Nazionale (1958) – the last Marian initiative of Pope Pius XII. It coordinates activities of Marian centres in Italy, and organizes Marian pilgrimages and Marian study weeks for priests. In addition it started Marian youth gatherings and publishes the journal Madonna.[183]

Of these organizations, the Marianum Pontifical Theological Faculty is the most active Marilogical centre in Rome.[185][186] This Pontifical Catholic Faculty was founded by Father Gabriel Roschini (who directed it for several years) under the direction of Pope Pius XII in 1950. At the Marianum, one can get a master's degree in Mariology (2-year academic program) and one can also get a doctorate in Mariology. This Mariological facility has a library with more than 85,000 volumes on Mariology and a number of magazines and journals of theological and Mariological concern. Marianum is also the name of the prestigious journal of Marian theology, founded by Father Roschini in 1939.[184]

In 1975, the University of Dayton in Ohio formed the International Marian Research Institute in affiliation with the Marianum to offer a doctorate in sacred theology (S.T.D.) and a licentiate in sacred theology (S.T.L.).[187]

References

  1. 1.International Theological Commission, The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being BaptisedClarification of original sin, grace, and the difference between dogma and theological opinion relevant to Marian preservation
  2. 2.Justin Martyr, Dialogue with TryphoEarly New Eve comparison between Mary's faith and Eve's disobedience
  3. 3.Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies, Book IIIPatristic doctrine of recapitulation and Mary's obedient participation as New Eve
  4. 4.Council of Ephesus, Formula of Union and conciliar receptionThe Christological confession protected by the title Theotokos or Mother of God
  5. 5.Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentiumThe Church, Eucharistic sacrifice, universal call to holiness, and the Blessed Virgin Mary in the mystery of Christ and the Church
  6. 6.Pius IX, Ineffabilis DeusSolemn definition of the Immaculate Conception in view of the merits of Jesus Christ
  7. 7.Pius XII, Munificentissimus DeusSolemn definition and traditional foundations of Mary's bodily Assumption
  8. 8.Dicastery for Divine Worship, Directory on Popular Piety and the LiturgyNorms and pastoral principles for Marian feasts, devotions, images, pilgrimages, and popular piety
  9. 9.Paul VI, Marialis cultusBiblical, liturgical, ecumenical, and anthropological principles for Marian devotion
  10. 10.Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Norms for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural PhenomenaCurrent ecclesial categories, authority, evidence, and prudence in assessing alleged apparitions and messages
  11. 11.John Paul II, Redemptoris MaterMary's pilgrimage of faith, divine motherhood, presence in the Church, and maternal mediation
  12. 12.John Paul II, Rosarium Virginis MariaeThe Christological, scriptural, contemplative, and ecclesial character of the Rosary
  13. 13.Catechism of the Catholic Church, 484–511 and 963–975Mary's divine motherhood, virginity, holiness, motherhood of the Church, intercession, and Assumption
  14. 14.The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3 (2005) defines Mariology as "the systematic study of the person of the Blessed Virgin Mary and of her place in the economy of the Incarnation"
  15. 15.Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Encyclopedia (ISBN 978-0-87973-669-9 page 649) defines Mariology as "The study of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Christian theology, especially in the Catholic Church"
  16. 16.Our Sunday Visitor's Encyclopedia of Saints ISBN 978-1-931709-75-0 page 917 defines Mariology as "Branch of theology that focuses on the Blessed Virgin. It examines her life, virtues, and important role in the economy of salvation."
  17. 17.Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions by Wendy Doniger, 1999 ISBN 0-87779-044-2 page 696
  18. 18.Symbolic Scores: Studies in the Music of the Renaissance by Willem Elders 1997 ISBN 90-04-09970-0 page 151
  19. 19.Maiden and Mother: Prayers, Hymns, Devotions, and Songs to the Beloved Virgin Mary Throughout the Year by Margaret M. Miles 2001 ISBN 0-86012-305-7 page vii
  20. 20.[20.2]From Trent to Vatican Two by Raymond F. Bulman, Frederick J. Parrella 2006 Oxford UP ISBN 0-19-517807-6 pages 179-180
  21. 21.Mary in the New Testament by Raymond E. Brown 1978 ISBN 0-8091-2168-9 page 28, "in the course of centuries, Mariology has had an enormous development"
  22. 22.Luigi Gambro in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 1-57918-355-7, 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, pages 142-145
  23. 23.Trent Pomplun in The Blackwell Companion to Catholicism by James Buckley, Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt and Trent Pomplun (Dec 21, 2010) ISBN 1-4443-3732-7 pages 319-320
  24. 24.[24.2]Christianity: The First Two Thousand Years by David Lawrence Edwards 2001 ISBN 0-304-70127-0 pages 438-439
  25. 25.[25.2]A Feminist Companion to Mariology by Amy-Jill Levine, Maria Mayo Robbins 2005 ISBN 0-8264-6661-3 page 147
  26. 26.[26.2]Sigmund Freud's Christian Unconscious by Paul C. Vitz 1993 ISBN 0-8028-0690-2 page 191
  27. 27.[27.2]Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion: L - Z by David Adams Leeming 2009 ISBN 0-387-71801-X page 900
  28. 28.Vatican website: Benedict XVI Address to the 23 Mariological Congress, September 8, 2012
  29. 29.Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, p. 30.
  30. 30.Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, pp. 34–35.
  31. 31.Avery Cardinal Dulles, SJ: A Model Theologian, by Patrick W. Carey (September 1, 2010) ISBN 0-8091-0571-3 page 553
  32. 32.Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, pp. 173–174.
  33. 33.Michael Schmaus in the Encyclopedia of Theology: a Concise Sacramentum Mundi edited by Karl Rahner (31 Dec 1999) ISBN 0-86012-006-6 pages 900-904
  34. 34.C. Balic, "The Marian rules of Dun Scotus", Euntes Docete, 9, 1956, 110
  35. 35.Bonaventura, Opera VI, 497
  36. 36.The Blackwell Companion to Catholicism by James Buckley, Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt and Trent Pomplun (December 21, 2010) ISBN 1-4443-3732-7 page 324
  37. 37.Bäumer, Kirchenlexikon, Pius XII
  38. 38.[38.2]"Ad Caeli Reginam (October 11, 1954) | PIUS XII". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  39. 39.Edward Sri "Advocate and Queen" in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Queenship Publishing ISBN 1-57918-355-7 pages 498-499
  40. 40.Contemporary Catholic Theology by Liam Gearon and Michael A. Hayes (Mar 1, 1999) ISBN 0-8264-1172-X page 283
  41. 41.[41.2]"Lumen gentium". www.vatican.va.
  42. 42.Church and Society: The Laurence J. McGinley Lectures by Avery Dulles (March 14, 2008) ISBN 0-8232-2862-2 page 256
  43. 43.[43.2]See John Henry Newman: "Mariology is always christocentric", in Michael Testa, Mary: The Virgin Mary in the Life and Writings of John Henry Newman 2001; "Mariology Is Christology", in Vittorio Messori, The Mary Hypothesis, Rome: 2005
  44. 44.Encyclical Redemptoris Mater, by Pope John Paul II, items 1, 48 and 51 Text at the Vatican web site
  45. 45.Mary: The Virgin Mary in the Life and Writings of John Henry Newman (Philip Boyce, ed.) Gracewing Publishing, 2001 ISBN 9780852445297
  46. 46.Messori, Vittorio. "Mariology Is Christology", The Mary Hypothesis, Rome: 2005
  47. 47.Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, pp. 51–52.
  48. 48.Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, p. 29.
  49. 49.Msgr. Charles Mangan in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 1-57918-355-7, 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, pages 520–529
  50. 50.see Pius XII, Mystici corporis, also John Paul II in Redemptoris Mater: The Second Vatican Council, by presenting Mary in the mystery of Christ, also finds the path to a deeper understanding of the mystery of the Church. Mary, as the Mother of Christ, is in a particular way united with the Church, "which the Lord established as his own body."11 "one cannot think of the reality of the Incarnation without referring to Mary, the Mother of the Incarnate Word." Redemptoris Mater item 44
  51. 51."If we look at the Church, we have to consider the miraculous deeds which God performed with his mother." (Pope Paul VI, Vatican II, November 21, 1964)
  52. 52.Pope Pius X, in Ad diem illum, section 5, 1904
  53. 53.Paul Haffner, 2004 The Mystery of Mary Gracewing Press ISBN 0-85244-650-0 page 17
  54. 54.The Virgin Mary in Intellectual and Spiritual Formation, Congregation for Catholic Education Rome, March 25, 1988, item 18
  55. 55.Raymond Leo Burke, in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, ISBN 1-57918-355-7 pages xvii-xx "The Virgin Mary in Intellectual and Spiritual Formation, issued during the heart of the Marian Year, on the first anniversary of the publication of Redemptoris Mater, reminds us that the promotion of the fuller knowledge of and more fervent devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary is the constant work of the Church."
  56. 56.Michael Schmaus, Katholische Dogmatik: Mariologie, 1955, p. 174
  57. 57.Matthewes-Green, Frederica (2007). The Lost Gospel of Mary: The Mother of Jesus in Three Ancient Texts. Brewster MA: Paraclete Press. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-1-55725-536-5.
  58. 58.Benz, Ernst The Eastern Orthodox Church: Its Thought and Life 2009 ISBN 0-202-36298-1 page 62
  59. 59.Renaissance Art: A Very Short Introduction by Geraldine A. Johnson 2005 ISBN 0-19-280354-9 pages 103-104
  60. 60.Otto Stegmüller, Barock, in Marienkunde, 1967 566
  61. 61.A Roskovany, conceptu immacolata ex monumentis omnium seculrorum demonstrate III, Budapest: 1873
  62. 62.Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in Marienlexikon, 567
  63. 63.Murphy, John Mary's Immaculate Heart 2007 ISBN 1-4067-3409-8 page 37 and pages 59–60
  64. 64."Pope John Paul II 1986 Speech at the Vatican Website". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  65. 65.Arthur Calkins, The Alliance of the Two Hearts and Consecration, Miles Immaculatae XXXI (July/December 1995) 389–407. [1]
  66. 66.Bäumer 534
  67. 67.Pope John Paul II. "Apostolic Letter of the Supreme Pontiff on the Most Holy Rosary". Rosarium Virginis Mariæ. Vatican. Retrieved 4 Oct 2010.
  68. 68."Mother Mary". National Catholic Reporter. 2019-06-09. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  69. 69.[69.2]Mark Miravalle, 1993, Introduction to Mary, Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pages 5-11
  70. 70.[70.2]Raymond Leo Burke, in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, ISBN 1-57918-355-7 pages xvii-xx
  71. 71."Catechism of the Catholic Church - The Transmission of Divine Revelation".
  72. 72.[72.2]Hauke 2008, pp. 167–168.
  73. 73.[73.2]"Saunders, William. "Mary, Mother of God", The Arlington Catholic Herald, December 22, 1994".
  74. 74.Hauke 2008, pp. 170–171.
  75. 75.Hauke 2008, p. 170.
  76. 76."Lumen gentium, 53". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  77. 77."Catechism of the Catholic Church". usccb.org.
  78. 78."Catechism of the Catholic Church - Mary - Mother of Christ, Mother of the Church".
  79. 79.[79.2][79.3]Introduction to Mary by Mark Miravalle (1993) Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pages 72-75
  80. 80.Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton 207 ISBN 0-8160-5455-X page 267
  81. 81.Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus item 44 at the Vatican web site
  82. 82.[82.2][82.3]Introduction to Mary by Mark Miravalle (1993) Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pages 75-78
  83. 83.Religious Celebrations: An Encyclopedia of Holidays, Festivals, Solemn Observances, and Spiritual Commemorations by J. Gordon Melton ISBN 1-59884-205-6 page 50
  84. 84.Encyclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae at the Vatican web site
  85. 85.Marshall, Taylor (2013-08-13). "Did the Virgin Mary Die? The Answer May Surprise You". Taylor Marshall. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  86. 86.St. Alphonsus Ligouri. The Glories of Mary.
  87. 87.Paul Haffner in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 1-57918-355-7, 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, pages 328-350
  88. 88.Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus item 39at the Vatican web site
  89. 89.[89.2][89.3]Mark Miravalle, 1993, Introduction to Mary, Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pages 64 and 70
  90. 90.[90.2][90.3]Fr. Peter Fehlner, "The Predestination of the Virgin Mother and Her Immaculate Conception" in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Queenship Publishing ISBN 1-57918-355-7 pages 215-217
  91. 91.The Creeds of Christendom by Philip Schaff 2009 ISBN 1-115-46834-0 page 211
  92. 92.Mark Miravalle, 1993, Introduction to Mary, Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 page 64-70
  93. 93.[93.2]"Fulgens Corona (September 8, 1953) | PIUS XII". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  94. 94.Catechism of the Catholic Church §499
  95. 95.Mark Miravalle, 1993, Introduction to Mary, Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pages 56-64
  96. 96.Mary in the New Testament edited by Raymond Edward Brown 1978 ISBN 0-8091-2168-9 page 273
  97. 97.A History of the Church in the Middle Ages by F. Donald Logan, 2002, ISBN 0-415-13289-4, p150
  98. 98.Joseph, Mary, Jesus by Lucien Deiss, Madeleine Beaumont 1996 ISBN 0-8146-2255-0 page 30
  99. 99.Catechism of the Catholic Church by the Vatican, 2002 ISBN 0-86012-324-3 page 112
  100. 100.[100.2][100.3][100.4][100.5]"Catechism of the Catholic Church - "Conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary"".
  101. 101."Lumen gentium". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  102. 102.[102.2]E.g. by Tertullian, Eunomius, Helvisius, Bonosus of Sardica; see Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma ISBN 0-89555-009-1 page 249
  103. 103.J D Aldama, La vergenidad in partu en la exegesis patristica, Salamanca, 1962, page 113
  104. 104.Introduction to Mary by Mark Miravalle (1993) Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pages 10-11
  105. 105.S. Gregorius Naz., Poemata dogmatica, XVIII, v. 58; PG XXXVII, 485.
  106. 106.Prudentius, Dittochaeum, XXVII: PL LX, 102 A.
  107. 107.S. Ephraem, Hymni de B. Maria, ed. Th. J. Lamy, t. II, Mechliniae, 1886, hymn. XIX, p. 624.
  108. 108.12, verses 1-5.
  109. 109.in:enyclical Ad caeli reginam
  110. 110.[110.2]Ad Caeli reginam 39
  111. 111.[111.2]International Theological Commission, Vol II: 1986-2007 edited by Michael Sharkey and Thomas Weinandy (Aug 21, 2009) ISBN 1-58617-226-3 page 208
  112. 112.[112.2]Hugo Rahner, "Mater Ecclesia - Lobpreis der Kirche aus dem ersten Jahrtausend", Einsiedeln/Köln 1944
  113. 113."Mary, Mother of Christ, Mother of the Church". Catechism item 963 at the Vatican web site
  114. 114.[114.2]John Paul II, Redemptoris Mater, no. 47, citing Pope Paul VI, Solemn Profession of Faith (30 June 1968), 15: Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60 (1968) 438f.
  115. 115.[115.2]Benedict XVI, Walker & Von Balthasar 2005, pp. 58–59.
  116. 116."Without the Church, Jesus 'is at the mercy of our imagination,' Pope says". Catholic News Agency.
  117. 117.1 Tim, 2,5
  118. 118.Oratio IV ad Deiparem
  119. 119.Ad Caeli Reginam, 51
  120. 120."Voice of the People for Mary Mediatrix". Archived from the original on 2008-09-23. Retrieved 2008-10-09.
  121. 121.Robert Moynihan, Is the Time Ripe for a 5th Marian Dogma? Zenit, March 1, 2010 Archived May 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  122. 122."Why It's Not the Right Time for a Dogma on Mary as Co-redemptrix". ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome. Archived from the original on 2008-09-28.
  123. 123.Ott 256
  124. 124."Pope calls idea of declaring Mary co-redemptrix 'foolishness'". cruxnow.com. 12 December 2019. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  125. 125."Lumen gentium, 62". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2017-12-20.
  126. 126.L'Osservatore Romano, Weekly Edition in English 25 June 1997, page 10 Archived 30 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  127. 127.Magnan, Charles. "The Spiritual Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary" in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, Queenship Publishing ISBN 1-57918-355-7 pages 530-541
  128. 128."Mystici Corporis Christi (June 29, 1943) | PIUS XII". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  129. 129."Redemptoris Mater (25 March 1987) | John Paul II". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  130. 130.Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X page 341
  131. 131.Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X page 168
  132. 132.Miravalle, Mark Introduction to Mary 1993, ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pages 13-23
  133. 133.Fr. Etienne Richter "Marian Devotion, the Rosary and the Scapular" in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons 2008 edited by M. Miravalle ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4 pages 667-679
  134. 134.Stefano Manelli in Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 1-57918-355-7, 2008 edited by M. Miravalle, page 12
  135. 135.John T. Ford "Newman on 'Sensus Fidelium' and Mariology", Marian Studies, Vol. 28 (1977), pp. 144-45
  136. 136.The Cult of the Mother of God in Byzantium by Leslie Brubaker and Mary Cunningham 2011 ISBN 0-7546-6266-7 pages 201-203
  137. 137.Alphonsus De Liguori: Selected Writings by Saint Alfonso Maria de' Liguori 1999 ISBN 0-8091-3771-2 pages 243 and 43
  138. 138.Pope Pius XII, encyclical Fulgens corona Encyclical Fulgens corona, item 10 at the Vatican web site
  139. 139."Catechism of the Catholic Church - IntraText". www.vatican.va.
  140. 140.William Henn, "Interpreting Marian Doctrine" in Gregorianum 70/3 (1989), p. 431
  141. 141.Pope Benedict XVI, General Audience 7 July 2010 at the Vatican web site
  142. 142."Marialis Cultus (February 2, 1974) | Paul VI". www.vatican.va.
  143. 143."404 Resource at /content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae.html not found". www.vatican.va.
  144. 144.The History of the Christian Church by Philip Smith 2009 ISBN 1-150-72245-2 page 288
  145. 145.Miravalle, Mark. Introduction to Mary. 1993 ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pages 92–93
  146. 146.Trigilio, John and Brighenti, Kenneth The Catholicism Answer Book 2007 ISBN 1-4022-0806-5 page 58
  147. 147.""2011 Dellinger, Robert. "'Grand Procession' revives founding of L.A. Marian devotion", The Tidings, 6 September 2011" (PDF).
  148. 148."Rees, Brenda. "Sept. 3: A day for a spiritual procession and walking history", The Tidings, September 2, 2011" (PDF).
  149. 149.The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary by George Henry Tavard 1996 ISBN 0-8146-5914-4 pages vii–viii and 81
  150. 150.Catholic Beliefs and Traditions: Ancient and Ever New by John F. O'Grady 2002 ISBN 0-8091-4047-0 page 183
  151. 151.[151.2]Encyclopedia of Feminist Literature by Mary Ellen Snodgrass 2006 ISBN 0-8160-6040-1 page 547
  152. 152.[152.2][152.3]The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary by George Henry Tavard 1996 ISBN 0-8146-5914-4 page 253
  153. 153.A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art by James Hall 1983 ISBN 0-06-433317-5 page 223
  154. 154.Iconography of Christian Art by Gertrud Schiller, 1971 ASIN B0023VMZMA page 112
  155. 155.Renaissance Art: A Topical Dictionary by Irene Earls 1987 ISBN 0-313-24658-0 page 174
  156. 156.Lauren Arnold, 1999 Princely Gifts & Papal Treasures: The Franciscan Mission to China by ISBN 0-9670628-0-2 page 151
  157. 157.Lauren Arnold in Atlantic Monthly, September 2007
  158. 158.The great encounter of China and the West by David E. Mungello 1999 ISBN 0-8476-9439-9 page 27
  159. 159.Art and music in the early modern period by Franca Trinchieri Camiz, Katherine A. McIver ISBN 0-7546-0689-9 page 15
  160. 160.Mujer del maiz by Angel Vigil 1994 ISBN 1-56308-194-6 pages 16–19
  161. 161.[161.2]Empire of the Aztecs by Barbara A. Somervill 2009 ISBN 1-60413-149-7 page 132
  162. 162.Our Lady of Guadalupe by Jeanette Rodríguez 1994 ISBN 0-292-77062-6 pages 44–46
  163. 163."Canonization of Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin". Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  164. 164.The Image of Guadalupe by Jody Brant Smith 1995 ISBN 0-86554-421-2 pages 1–2
  165. 165.Miracles of Our Lady by Gonzalo de Berceo, Richard Terry Mount, Annette Grant Cash 1997 ISBN 0-8131-2019-5 page 6–7
  166. 166.Miracles of the Blessed Virgin Mary by Johannes Herolt, C. C. Swinton Blandpages 2004 ISBN 1-4191-7308-1 pages 4–6
  167. 167.Piety and charity in late medieval Florence by John Henderson 1997 ISBN 0-226-32688-8 page 196
  168. 168.Pilgrimage to Images in the Fifteenth Century by Robert Maniura 2004 ISBN 1-84383-055-8 page 104
  169. 169.Maximilian Kolbe: Saint of Auschwitz by Elaine Murray Stone 1997 ISBN 0-8091-6637-2 pages 7–8
  170. 170.Lourdes: A History of Its Apparitions and Cures by Georges Bertrin 2004 ISBN 1-4179-8123-7 page 181
  171. 171.The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3 by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 ISBN 90-04-12654-6 page 339
  172. 172.van Biega, David (April 10, 1995). "Modern Miracles Have Strict Rules". Time. Archived from the original on February 17, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
  173. 173.Mary is for Everyone by William McLoughlin, Jill Pinnock 1998 ISBN 0-85244-429-X page 183
  174. 174.Carl Jung by Claire Dunne 2002 ISBN 0-8264-6307-X page 84
  175. 175.Progressive Christianity by William A. Vrooman 2005 ISBN 1-4179-9829-6 page 150
  176. 176.Hail Mary?: The Struggle for Ultimate Womanhood in Catholicism by Maurice Hamington 1995, ISBN 0-415-91304-7, pages 2 and 36
  177. 177.Blessed One: Protestant Perspectives On Mary by Beverly Roberts Gaventa, Cynthia L. Rigby 2002 ISBN 0-664-22438-5 page 102
  178. 178."From East to West". east2west.org.
  179. 179.Ecclesiasticus II: Orthodox Icons, Saints, Feasts and Prayer by George Dion Dragas 2005 ISBN 0-9745618-0-0 page 178
  180. 180."Lecture III: St. Mary's Dormition & Assumption" (PDF).
  181. 181."From East to West". east2west.org.
  182. 182."Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary - Perth Amboy, NJ". assumptioncatholicchurch.net.
  183. 183.[183.2]Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534
  184. 184.[184.2][184.3]Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535
  185. 185."Pontificia Facoltà Teologica "Marianum" - Roma". www.marianum.it. Retrieved 2020-06-20.
  186. 186.at Viale 30 Aprile- 6, 00153, Rome
  187. 187."The Mary Page". udayton.edu. Archived from the original on 2011-10-12.