Assumption of Mary

GuideMary's bodily Assumption into heavenly glory is a solemnly defined dogma; whether she first experienced death and the historical circumstances of her Dormition remain distinct questions governed by tradition, theology, and evidence.
Contents

The Assumption of Mary is the divinely revealed dogma that the Immaculate Mother of God, having completed the course of her earthly life, was taken body and soul into heavenly glory by the power of God.

The Assumption of Mary is a Catholic dogma that Mary, at the end of her earthly life, was taken body and soul into heaven, defined by Pope Pius XII on 1 November 1950 in his apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus.[15] It is celebrated on 15 August.

It leaves open the question of whether Mary died or whether she was raised to eternal life without bodily death.[16]

The equivalent belief in the Eastern Christianity is the Dormition of the Mother of God or the "Falling Asleep of the Mother of God". In the Lutheran Churches, 15 August is celebrated as the Feast of St. Mary.[17] A number of Anglican denominations observe 15 August under various titles, including the Feast of Saint Mary the Virgin or the Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary.[18][19]

The word 'assumption' derives from the Latin word assūmptiō, meaning 'taking up'.

Dogmatic definition

Pius XII solemnly defined that Mary, ever Virgin and Mother of God, after completing the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory. Because the pope explicitly intended to define a divinely revealed dogma for the whole Church, Catholics owe it the assent of divine and Catholic faith. It is not an optional devotion or merely probable conclusion.

The definition's subject is the whole person of Mary. Her soul did not remain permanently separated from her body, nor did her body undergo the corruption that ordinarily follows death while awaiting the last day. God granted her in advance the bodily glorification promised to the just, wholly by Christ's grace and in a manner fitting her singular vocation.

The formula deliberately says that Mary had completed the course of earthly life without defining whether she died. The dominant Catholic tradition, shared especially with the Christian East, holds that she truly died in conformity with her Son and was then raised and assumed. A Catholic may discuss the minority opinion that she did not die, provided the defined bodily Assumption is maintained.

No dogma supplies the date, location, witnesses, or physical sequence of the event. Jerusalem and Ephesus possess ancient associations, and later narratives elaborate the gathering of the apostles, but their historical status differs from the revealed truth itself. Faith rests on God's revelation received in the Church, not on treating every Dormition story as eyewitness reportage.

Assumption and Ascension

Mary's Assumption must be distinguished from Christ's Ascension. The incarnate Son rose and ascended by the power proper to his divine person; Mary was raised and taken into glory by God's power as a redeemed creature. The verb assumed safeguards dependence on grace and prevents placing the Mother on the level of her Son.

Christ is the first fruits and cause of the resurrection of the dead. Mary's privilege is a unique participation in his Paschal victory and an anticipation of the Church's common destiny. It never implies a second redeemer, a separate source of salvation, or exemption from Christ's merits; every Marian grace is received through the one Mediator.

The Assumption also differs from the biblical translations of Enoch and Elijah, whose precise states belong to separate exegetical questions. The dogma speaks unambiguously of Mary's body and soul in heavenly glory. It is not simply removal from ordinary society, miraculous preservation somewhere on earth, or suspension of death without final glorification.

Art sometimes depicts Mary rising through clouds by her own motion, but iconography expresses theological reality symbolically rather than defining mechanics. The Latin tradition often emphasizes upward glorification; Eastern Dormition icons show Christ receiving Mary's soul and frequently her heavenly enthronement. Both direct attention to God's act and Mary's eschatological fulfillment.[1]

Scriptural foundations

Mary in the economy of salvation

Scripture does not narrate the Assumption in a single explicit historical scene. The doctrine is nevertheless grounded in the biblical pattern of Mary's union with Christ, her divine motherhood, her fullness of grace, the enmity between the woman and the serpent, and the promised victory of Christ over sin and death. The Church reads these texts together within apostolic Tradition.

At the Annunciation Mary freely receives the Word in faith and body; at the Cross she stands with her Son and receives a maternal relation to his disciples; at Pentecost she prays with the apostolic Church. Her whole vocation is embodied cooperation with grace. It is fitting that the body from which the Word took flesh should share uniquely in his bodily victory.

The woman, ark, and queen

Revelation 12 presents a woman clothed with the sun, crowned with twelve stars, who gives birth to the messianic ruler and suffers conflict with the dragon. The woman signifies the people of God and the Church, yet Mary personally embodies these corporate realities as Mother of the Messiah. The text contributes to Assumption theology without functioning as a bare chronicle of the event.[2]

Psalm 132's summons for the Lord and the ark of his might to arise into rest, together with the New Testament's presentation of Mary as ark of the new covenant, supports liturgical typology. The queen at the king's right hand and the Daughter of Zion likewise illuminate her glory. Typology is ecclesial reading grounded in God's unified economy, not an arbitrary code detached from literal sense.

Resurrection promises

Christ promises bodily resurrection to those united with him and declares that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood will be raised on the last day. Saint Paul teaches that Christ will transform lowly bodies to conform to his glorious body. Mary receives this common promise in an anticipatory way because her union with Christ is unique in grace and mission.

The Assumption therefore confirms rather than bypasses universal resurrection. Mary's glorified body shows what salvation intends for human nature and creation. Her privilege differs in time and singular fittingness, not in ultimate species: the redeemed are called to bodily glory through Christ, though they ordinarily await the Parousia for its completion.

Sacred Tradition

The apostolic deposit is transmitted in Scripture and Sacred Tradition as one divine source entrusted to the Church. The absence of a direct New Testament narrative does not make a doctrine extrabiblical in the sense of foreign to revelation. The Church discerns what has been handed on through worship, preaching, the Fathers, the sense of the faithful, and the Magisterium under the Holy Spirit.

Early centuries provide no uniformly detailed Assumption account, and silence should not be converted into invented documentation. By late antiquity, however, diverse Transitus Mariae writings attest widespread interest in Mary's end. Their legendary details are not canonical Scripture, but their diffusion forms historical evidence for a developing and increasingly common conviction that Mary's body did not remain in the grave.

Patristic homilies, especially in the East, move from narrative traditions to theological reflection. Saints Modestus of Jerusalem, Andrew of Crete, Germanus of Constantinople, and John Damascene proclaim Mary's Dormition and bodily glorification. Their testimony differs in date and form, yet it establishes that the feast and its doctrinal content were deeply rooted long before modern definition.[3]

The lack of an uncontested bodily relic is fitting and often noted, but it is not an independent proof. Historical arguments from silence remain limited. The stronger traditional witness is the Church's sustained liturgical and doctrinal reception, interpreted by the teaching office rather than assembled as a courtroom demonstration from archaeological absence.

Development of the feast

Eastern Dormition

A commemoration of Mary's repose developed in Jerusalem and spread through the Byzantine world, where Emperor Maurice is traditionally associated with fixing 15 August for the feast. The liturgy calls the event Dormition, or falling asleep, and holds together death, burial, translation, and glorification. Preparatory fasting and rich hymnography make it one of the East's principal celebrations.[4]

Eastern Catholic Churches preserve their own received texts rather than merely translating the Roman solemnity. The Byzantine troparion proclaims that in giving birth Mary preserved virginity and in falling asleep did not abandon the world. Syriac, Armenian, Coptic, and other traditions express related faith with their own calendars, poetry, and narrative emphases.

Western reception

The feast entered the West under names including the Natalis, Dormition, and Assumption of Saint Mary. Roman sacramentaries, homilies, processions, and calendars gradually consolidated 15 August as the principal Marian feast. Medieval debate concerned the quality of historical testimonies and whether death occurred, but devotion and theological confidence in bodily Assumption became pervasive.[5]

The octave, vigils, blessings, and local customs developed differently across Europe and beyond. Liturgical reform retained the solemnity while revising texts around biblical and ecclesial themes. The feast's history demonstrates organic development: worship clarifies belief, theological reflection tests it, and the Magisterium judges whether the universal tradition belongs to revelation.[6]

Theological fittingness

The Immaculate Conception preserved Mary from original sin from the first moment of her existence through the anticipated merits of Christ. Because bodily corruption is associated with the inherited condition of sin, it is fitting that the all-holy Mother should not remain under corruption. This reasoning reveals harmony among privileges but does not make grace a biological necessity imposed upon God.

Mary's divine motherhood provides another fittingness. The eternal Word truly received human flesh from her, and the body she bore, nurtured, and offered in maternal discipleship belonged wholly to her vocation. God honors rather than discards creaturely mediation. The ark that bore the incarnate covenant is brought into the sanctuary of glory.

Her perpetual virginity signifies undivided bodily consecration to God. The Assumption brings that consecration to eschatological completion, showing that virginity for the Kingdom is fruitful rather than sterile and that bodily holiness is not negation. Yet the doctrine does not make marriage or ordinary bodily life inferior paths to resurrection.

Mary's close union with Christ in suffering and faith makes participation in his victory fitting. She stood beneath the Cross, consented throughout the pilgrimage of faith, and received no immunity from sorrow. Bodily glory crowns obedient discipleship; it does not transform her life into a sequence without darkness, growth, or dependence on redemption.

Definition by Pius XII

Before defining the dogma, Pius XII asked the world's bishops whether Mary's bodily Assumption could be defined and whether they and their people desired it. The responses showed overwhelming agreement. This consultation did not create revelation by majority vote; it helped manifest the ordinary teaching and worship of the Church and the concord of pastors and faithful.[7]

Munificentissimus Deus reviews Scripture, liturgy, Fathers, scholastic theologians, papal teaching, sacred art, and devotion. Its argument is cumulative and ecclesial. Pius XII presents the Assumption as the crowning privilege corresponding to Mary's Immaculate Conception, divine motherhood, virginity, and union with her Son's triumph.[8][9]

The definition was an exercise of papal infallibility under the conditions later articulated at Vatican I: the pope taught as universal pastor, defined a doctrine concerning faith, and bound the whole Church. It therefore illustrates rather than competes with the ordinary and universal Magisterium, for the solemn act confirmed a belief already broadly received by bishops and faithful.

The penalty language attached to denial must be read canonically and doctrinally, not as permission for personal condemnation. Knowing and obstinate denial of a revealed dogma is heresy; culpability in a particular person requires knowledge and freedom judged with pastoral care. The proper response is clear catechesis, invitation to faith, and prayer rather than rhetorical aggression.

Mary's death and Dormition

Most Fathers, liturgies, theologians, and recent popes affirm or favor Mary's death. Death did not imply personal sin, since Christ himself freely underwent death despite sinlessness. Mary's conformity to her Son makes a real Dormition theologically fitting, followed by immediate resurrection and Assumption without bodily corruption.

The dogmatic formula does not settle the question. Pius XII's phrase after completing the course of her earthly life was chosen so that the definition would not depend on resolving it. John Paul II later taught in an ordinary audience that tradition commonly holds Mary experienced natural death, but this statement did not add death to the object solemnly defined in 1950.[10]

Dormition should not be reduced to a euphemism. In Christian usage falling asleep expresses death in hope of resurrection. Eastern liturgy can speak at once of Mary's tomb, her passing, and her life in glory. Western Catholics may receive this vocabulary without pretending that every associated legend shares the authority of the liturgical confession.

Claims that Mary's incorrupt body remains hidden on earth contradict the defined dogma. Claims to possess ordinary bodily relics of Mary likewise require rejection. Objects associated with her earthly life, alleged veils or garments, and sites of memory present different historical questions; none is her glorified body, which belongs to heavenly life.

Mary, the Church, and Christian hope

Vatican II situates the Assumption within the mystery of Christ and the Church. Mary is the beginning and image of the Church as it will be perfected in the age to come, while she shines before the pilgrim people as a sign of sure hope and consolation. Her privilege is therefore ecclesial rather than an isolated honor enjoyed apart from other Christians.[11]

The dogma safeguards the goodness and destiny of the body. Salvation is not escape from femaleness, maternity, history, or matter. A woman already shares bodily in the promised glory, not by autonomous self-realization but by grace received in faith. This makes the Assumption especially powerful against both contempt for the body and its commercial exploitation.

Mary's heavenly motherhood continues within the communion of saints. Her intercession depends entirely upon Christ and manifests his generosity, since the one Mediator enables his members to pray for one another. The Assumption makes her proximity to the Church universal in glory; it does not grant omniscience by nature or turn her into a goddess.[12]

Her glorification also confirms that hidden holiness matters. Mary's earthly life was largely obscure, domestic, and contemplative, yet no act of faith was lost. The final exaltation of the lowly reveals God's judgment against worldly measures of importance and encourages ordinary disciples whose fidelity remains unseen.

Liturgy and devotion

The Roman Rite celebrates the Assumption as a solemnity on 15 August. It is a holy day of obligation wherever the competent conference and the Holy See retain the obligation; local law governs exemptions or transfers. The Mass and Office proclaim Mary's glory in relation to Christ's Resurrection, the ark, the woman clothed with the sun, and the first fruits of redemption.[13][14]

Eastern Catholics celebrate according to their own calendars and rites, often with a Dormition fast and a burial service or epitaphios. These observances are not theatrical supplements to the dogma but authoritative liturgical witnesses to the inherited faith of the Churches. Calendar differences may place the civil celebration on another date for communities using the Julian calendar.

Popular customs include processions, blessings of herbs or produce, pilgrimages, crowns, hymns, and parish festivals. Their doctrinal value depends on their orientation to Christ and the Church's worship. Devotion should deepen Eucharistic life, hope of resurrection, chastity, charity, and prayer rather than become cultural display or curiosity about unrecorded details.

The Glorious Mystery of the Rosary joins Assumption and Coronation within contemplation of salvation. Rosary language need not imply that every artistic sequence is separately defined. The Church permits imaginative meditation under the rule of faith, distinguishing devotional elaboration from the precise content Catholics must believe.

Eastern Orthodox and ecumenical perspectives

Eastern Orthodox Christians solemnly celebrate the Dormition and commonly profess Mary's bodily glorification, though they do not accept the 1950 papal definition as an exercise of universal jurisdiction. The substantial convergence is greater than polemical summaries sometimes suggest. Catholic dialogue should state both shared faith and the remaining question of how dogma is authoritatively defined.

Some Orthodox object that the West separated Assumption from Dormition or reasoned too narrowly from the Immaculate Conception. Catholic theology need not deny the broader Eastern pattern of death, resurrection, liturgy, and ecclesial glorification. Munificentissimus Deus itself cites Eastern Fathers and worship, even as it speaks through Latin doctrinal development.

Most Protestant communities do not accept the dogma because they judge its scriptural attestation insufficient or reject binding Tradition and papal definition. A Catholic answer should begin with the nature of revelation and the Church rather than hunting for a single proof text. Once Scripture, Tradition, typology, worship, and magisterial authority are understood together, the doctrine's basis becomes intelligible.

Ecumenical courtesy cannot turn a dogma into a negotiable metaphor. Nor does fidelity require pretending that separated Christians lack every element of truth about Mary. Shared confession of Christ's bodily Resurrection, final resurrection, grace, and the communion of saints provides real ground for conversation while differences about authority remain decisive.

Objections and clarifications

The absence of an explicit Assumption narrative in the New Testament is not disproof. Scripture itself does not claim to record every apostolic teaching, and the canon is received through Tradition. The relevant question is whether the doctrine belongs to the deposit as discerned by the Church, not whether a modern reader can infer it from one verse without ecclesial guidance.

Legendary Transitus details neither prove nor disprove the dogma. Apocryphal literature can preserve early motifs alongside theological imagination and error. The Church does not canonize a document merely by finding its central theme consonant with faith. Historical criticism should distinguish textual development from the dogmatic judgment reached through the whole tradition.

The Assumption does not deny Mary's need for redemption. She calls God her Savior, and every privilege comes through Christ's merits. Preventive redemption in the Immaculate Conception and anticipatory bodily redemption in the Assumption display the Savior's power more perfectly; they do not place Mary outside the human race or outside grace.

Finally, belief does not depend on an astronomical location of heaven. Bodily glorification is real even though heaven transcends ordinary spatial coordinates and the renewed cosmos has not yet appeared. Theology confesses Mary's whole personal existence with God and leaves the physical modality to divine mystery rather than translating glory into a hidden orbit within the present universe.

History

Some scholars argue that the Dormition and Assumption traditions can be traced early in church history in the apocryphal books, with Stephen J. Shoemaker noting about the dating:

For instance, Baldi, Masconi, and Cothenet analyzed the corpus of Dormition narratives using a rather different approach, governed primarily by language tradition rather than literary relations, and yet all agree that the Obsequies (i.e., the Liber Requiei Mariae) and the Six Books Dormition Apocryphon reflect the earliest traditions, locating their origins in the second or third century. Richard Bauckham too, through study... dates the Six Books to the fourth century....Numerous others, including Maximilian Bonnet, Jean Rivière, and Jean Gribomont, have concluded that these narratives originate in the fourth century, if not earlier.[20]

According to Shoemaker, the first known narrative to address the end of Mary's life and her assumption is the apocryphal third- and possibly second-century Liber Requiei Mariae ("The Book of Mary's Repose").[21][22] Yet numerous features indicate that the Liber Requiei Mariae, or the Obsequies of the Virgin, as the text is called in Syriac, has manuscripts which date according to Shoemaker to the "fifth or sixth centuries" where the "original Greek underlying these early translations almost certainly belongs to the fourth century."[20]

Another early source that speaks of the assumption are the Six Books Dormition Apocryphon. It dates almost certainly to the middle of the fourth century, if not perhaps even earlier.[23] Most significantly, the Six Books Dormition Apocryphon provides compelling evidence for an early cult of the Virgin nearly a century before the events of the Council of Ephesus.[23] Shoemaker, expressing his own opinion on the subject, states: "the diversity of their accounts already by the end of the fifth century ensures the apocryphon’s composition by the early fifth century at the very latest, and a number of features locate the Six Books much more probably in the fourth century" with the "Six Books apocryphon present[ing] a rather different sensibility about the veneration of Mary from the Liber Requiei".

The Greek Discourse on the Dormition or The Book of John Concerning the Falling Asleep of Mary (attributed to John the Theologian), is another anonymous narrative, and may even precede the Book of Mary's Repose.[24] This Greek document, is dated by Tischendorf as no later than the 4th century,[25] but is dated by Shoemaker as later.[24]

The New Testament is silent regarding the end of her life. In the late 4th century Epiphanius of Salamis wrote he could find no authorized tradition about how her life ended.[26] Nevertheless, although Epiphanius could not decide on the basis of biblical or church tradition whether Mary had died or remained immortal, his indecisive reflections suggest that some difference of opinion on the matter had already arisen in his time,[27] and he identified three beliefs concerning her end: that she had a normal and peaceful death; that she died as a martyr; or that she did not die.[27] Even more, in another text Epiphanius stated that Mary was like Elijah because she never died but was assumed, like him.[28]

Other works that mention the assumption of Mary are the apocryphal treatise De Obitu S. Dominae, bearing the name of St. John, which belongs however to the fourth or fifth century. It is also found in the apocryphal book De Transitus Beatae Mariae Virginis, falsely ascribed to Melito of Sardis, and in a spurious letter attributed to Denis the Areopagite.[29][30]

Teaching of the assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world, having been celebrated as early as the 5th century and having been established in the East by Emperor Maurice around 600 AD.[31] In a homily, John Damascene (675–749 AD), citing the third book of the Euthymiac History, records the following:

St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), made known to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened upon the request of St. Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles concluded that the body was taken up to heaven.[32][33][34][35]

There is a large number of accounts of the assumption of the Virgin Mary, published in various languages (including Greek, Latin, Coptic, Syriac, Ethiopic, Arabic). The standard Greek text is the one attributed to St John the Theologian (Evangelist). The standard Latin is that attributed to Melito of Sardis.[36] Shoemaker mentions that "the ancient narratives are neither clear nor unanimous in either supporting or contradicting the dogma" of the assumption.[37]

According to the Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary, attributed to Joseph of Arimathea, which is a later version of the Virgin Mary's Dormition, probably from sometime after the early seventh century, one of the apostles, often identified as Thomas the Apostle, was not present at the death of Mary but his late arrival precipitates a reopening of Mary's tomb, which is found to be empty except for her grave clothes.[38] Subsequently, Mary drops her girdle down to the apostle from heaven as testament to the event.[39] This incident is depicted in many later paintings of the assumption.

The feast of the Dormition, arrived in the West in the early 7th century, its name changing to Assumption in some 9th century liturgical calendars.[40] The feast was decreed for Constantinople on 15 August by the emperor Maurice in 600; about fifty years later it was introduced in Rome and is mentioned in a papal decree of Sergius (687–701), who fixed a procession for the feast.[41] Pope Leo IV (reigned 847–855) gave the feast a vigil and an octave to solemnise it above all others, Pope Nicholas I (858–867) placed it on a par with Christmas and Easter, and Pope Benedict XIV (1740–1758) declared it "a probable opinion, which to deny were impious and blasphemous".[42]

Between 1849 and 1950, numerous petitions for the assumption to be declared as dogma arrived in Rome. On 1 May 1946 the Pope sent to the bishops of the world the encyclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae,[43] putting this questions to them: "Do you, venerable brethren, in your outstanding wisdom and prudence, judge that the bodily Assumption of the Blessed Virgin can be proposed and defined as a dogma of faith? Do you, with your clergy and people, desire it?" The bishops gave an almost unanimous affirmative response to both these questions.[15]

Finally, on 1 November 1950, Pope Pius XII declared the Assumption of the Virgin Mary as a dogma of faith with the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus as follows:

We pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.[15]

Pope Pius XII expressed in his apostolic constitution the hope that the belief in the bodily assumption of the virgin Mary into heaven "will make our belief in our own resurrection stronger and render it more effective",[44] while the Catechism of the Catholic Church adds: "The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a singular participation in her Son's Resurrection and an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians."[45]

At the time of the 1950 papal announcement, psychologist Carl Jung considered it "the most important religious event since the Reformation."[46]

In some versions of the assumption narrative, the assumption is said to have taken place in Ephesus, in the House of the Virgin Mary. This is a much more recent and localised tradition. The earliest traditions say that Mary's life ended in Jerusalem (see Tomb of the Virgin Mary).[47]

Scholars of the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum "argued that during or shortly after the apostolic age a group of Jewish Christians in Jerusalem preserved an oral tradition about the end of the Virgin's life". Thus, by pointing to oral tradition, they argued for the historicity of the assumption and Dormition narratives. According to Antoine Wenger "the strikingly diverse traditions of Mary's Dormition and Assumption arise from 'a great variety of original types', rather than being the result of a progressive modification of a single, original tradition". Simon Claude Mimouni and his predecessors have argued that belief in the Virgin's Assumption is the final dogmatic development, rather than the point of origin, of these traditions.[48]

In the German-speaking and some Slavic countries (like Poland), the custom of blessing (aromatic) herbs is associated with the Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. This ancient custom "came to be associated with the Blessed Virgin Mary, in part because of the biblical images applied to her such as vine, lavender, cypress and lily, partly from seeing her in terms of a sweet smelling flower because of her virtue", and Isaiah's reference to the shoot springing from the side of Jesse, which brought Jesus Christ as a fruit.[49] The custom is also related to the tradition of the Frauendreißiger (means approx. "thirty days of Our Lady"), a period lasting to 8 September, the Feast of the Nativity of Mary. This rural tradition goes back to the fact that the herbs contain particularly high levels of essential oils at this time of year and are especially healthy.

Scriptural basis

The apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus mentions several Holy Fathers, theologians and Doctors of the Church who held the assumption of Mary, among them are Adrian I, Sergius I, Leo IV, John of Damascus, Amadeus of Lausanne, Modestus of Jerusalem, Anthony of Padua, Albertus Magnus, Thomas of Aquinas (Angelic Doctor), Bonaventure (Seraphic Doctor), Bernardino of Siena, Robert Bellarmine, Francis de Sales, Peter Canisius, Francisco Suárez, among others.[15] The apostolic constitution adds: "All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation."

Father Jugie, expressed the view that Revelation 12:1–2 was the chief scriptural witness to the assumption:[43]

And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; and she was with child ...

Revelation 12:1–2

This passage, Epiphanius proposes, may indicate that Mary did not die as other human beings, but somehow remained immortal, although he makes clear his own uncertainty and refrains from advocating this view. Ultimately Epiphanius concludes: "[I] am not saying that she remained immortal. But neither am I affirming that she died."[50]

Since the time of the early Church Fathers, this image of "the woman clothed with the sun" has had a threefold symbolism: the ancient people of Israel, the Church and Mary.[51]

Many of the bishops cited Genesis 3:15, in which God is addressing the serpent in the Garden of Eden, as the primary confirmation of Mary's assumption:[52]

I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.

— Genesis 3:15

Many scholars connect Jesus' usage of the word "woman" to call Mary instead of calling her "mother" as a confirmation of Mary being the "woman" described in Genesis 3:15. Mary was often seen as the "New Eve", who crushed the serpent's head at the Annunciation by obeying the angel Gabriel when he said she would bear the Messiah (Luke 1:38).[53]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms that the account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, and that the fall of mankind, by the seductive voice of the snake in the Bible, represents the fallen angel, Satan or "the devil".[54] Similarly, the great dragon in Revelation 12 is a representation of Satan, identified with the serpent from the garden who has enmity with the woman.[55] Therefore, in Catholic thought, there is an association between this woman and Mary's Assumption.

Among the many other passages noted by Pope Pius XII were the following:[52]

  • Psalm 132 (Psalm 132:8), greeting the return of the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem ("Arise, O Lord, into your resting place, you and the ark which you have sanctified!"), where the ark is taken as the prophetic "type" of Mary;[56]
  • Revelation 11:19, in which John sees the Ark of the Covenant in heaven (this verse immediately precedes the vision of the woman clothed with the sun);
  • Luke 1:28, in which the Archangel Gabriel greets Mary with the words, "Hail Mary, full of grace", since Mary's bodily assumption is a natural consequence of being full of grace;
  • 1 Corinthians 15 (1 Corinthians 15:23) and Matthew 27 (Matthew 27:52–53), concerning the certainty of bodily resurrection for all who have faith in Jesus.

The Bible mentions two prominent figures, Enoch and Elijah, who were taken up to heaven, serving as important precedents for the assumption of Mary. Enoch, referenced in the Book of Genesis, is noted for his intimate walk with God and is described as having been "taken" by God (Genesis 5:24), an event that is also reported in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Hebrews 11:5). Similarly, Elijah, the great prophet, was taken up to heaven in a whirlwind, accompanied by a chariot of fire, as recorded in 2 Kings (2 Kings 2:11).

Catholic Marian visionaries and the assumption

In the 12th century, the German nun Elisabeth of Schönau was reportedly granted visions of Mary and her son which had a profound influence on the Western Church's tradition. In her work Visio de resurrectione Beatae Virginis Mariae, she relates how Mary was assumed in body and soul into Heaven.[40][57]

On 1 May 1950, Gilles Bouhours, a Marian seer, reported to Pius XII a presumed message that the Virgin Mary would have ordered him to communicate to the pope on the dogma of the Assumption of the Holy Virgin Mary. It is said that Pius XII asked God, during the Holy Year of 1950, for a sign that could reassure him that the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary was actually wanted by God and when Gilles communicated the message to Pius XII, the pope considered this message the hoped-for sign. Six months after the private audience granted to Gilles by the pope, Pius XII himself proclaimed the dogma of the Assumption of body and soul of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven.[58]

Assumption versus Dormition

Some Mary died before being assumed, but they believe that she was miraculously resurrected before being assumed (mortalistic interpretation). Others believe she was assumed bodily into Heaven without first dying (immortalistic interpretation).[59][60] Either understanding may be legitimately held by Catholics, with Eastern Catholics observing the Feast as the Dormition. It seems, however, that there is much more evidence for the mortalistic position in the Catholic traditions (liturgy, apocrypha, material culture).[61] Pope John Paul II expressed the mortalistic position in his public speech.[62]

Many theologians note by way of comparison that in the Catholic Church the assumption is dogmatically defined, whilst in the Eastern Orthodox tradition the Dormition is less dogmatically than liturgically and mystically defined. Such differences spring from a larger pattern in the two traditions, wherein Catholic teachings are often dogmatically and authoritatively defined – in part because of the more centralized structure of the Catholic Church – whilst in Eastern Orthodoxy many doctrines are less authoritative.[63]

The Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary is celebrated in the Roman Catholic Church on 15 August, and the Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholics celebrate the Dormition of the Mother of God (or Dormition of the Theotokos, the "falling asleep of the Mother of God") on the same date, preceded by a 14-day fasting period. Eastern Christians believe that Mary died a natural death, that her soul was received by Christ upon death, that her body was resurrected after her death and that she was taken up into heaven bodily in anticipation of the general resurrection.

Orthodox tradition is clear and unwavering in regard to the central point [of the Dormition]: the Holy Virgin underwent, as did her Son, a physical death, but her body – like His – was afterwards raised from the dead and she was taken up into heaven, in her body as well as in her soul. She has passed beyond death and judgement and lives wholly in the Age to Come. The Resurrection of the Body ... has in her case been anticipated and is already an accomplished fact. That does not mean, however, that she is dissociated from the rest of humanity and placed in a wholly different category: for we all hope to share one day in that same glory of the Resurrection of the Body that she enjoys even now.[64]

Protestant views

Views differ within Protestantism, with those with a theology closer to Catholicism sometimes believing in a bodily assumption whilst most Protestants do not.

Lutheran views

The Feast of the Assumption of Mary was retained by the Lutheran Church after the Reformation.[65] Evangelical Lutheran Worship designates 15 August as a lesser festival named "Mary, Mother of Our Lord" while the current Lutheran Service Book formally calls it "St. Mary, Mother of our Lord".[65]

Anglican views

Within Anglicanism the Assumption of Mary is accepted by some, rejected by others, or regarded as adiaphora ("a thing indifferent").[66] The doctrine effectively disappeared from Anglican worship in 1549, partially returning in Anglo-Catholic tradition during the 20th century under different names. A Marian feast on 15 August is celebrated by the Church of England as a non-specific feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a feast called by the Scottish Episcopal Church simply "Mary the Virgin",[67][68][69] and in the US-based Episcopal Church it is observed as the feast of "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ",[19] while other Anglican provinces have a feast of the Dormition[67] – the Anglican Church of Canada's Book of Common Prayer (1962), for instance, marks the day as the "Falling Asleep of the Blessed Virgin Mary".[18]

The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission, which seeks to identify common ground between the two communions, released in 2004 a non-authoritative declaration meant for study and evaluation, the "Seattle Statement"; this "agreed statement" concludes that "the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception, understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions".[70]

Continental Reformed views

The Protestant reformer Heinrich Bullinger believed in the assumption of Mary. His 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry[71] expressed his belief that Mary's sacrosanctum corpus ("sacrosanct body") had been assumed into heaven by angels:

Hac causa credimus ut Deiparae virginis Mariae purissimum thalamum et spiritus sancti templum, hoc est, sacrosanctum corpus ejus deportatum esse ab angelis in coelum.[72]

For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.[73]

An Eastern Orthodox tradition recommends a fast of fourteen days before the Feast of the Assumption of Mary.[74] Fasting in the Eastern Orthodox Churches generally consists of abstinence from certain food groups; during the Dormition fast, one observes a strict fast on weekdays, with wine and oil allowed on weekends and, additionally, fish on the Transfiguration (6 August).[75]

The Assumption is important to many Christians, especially Catholics and Orthodox, as well as many Lutherans and Anglicans, as the Virgin Mary's heavenly birthday (the day that Mary was received into Heaven). Belief about her acceptance into the glory of Heaven is seen by some Christians as the symbol of the promise made by Jesus to all enduring Christians that they too will be received into paradise. The Assumption of Mary is symbolised in the Fleur-de-lys Madonna.

The present Italian name of the holiday, Ferragosto, may derive from the Latin name, Feriae Augusti ("Holidays of the Emperor Augustus"),[76] since the month of August took its name from the emperor. The feast was introduced by Bishop Cyril of Alexandria in the 5th century. In the course of Christianization, he put it on 15 August. In the middle of August, Augustus celebrated his victories over Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra at Actium and Alexandria with a three-day triumph. The anniversaries (and later only 15 August) were public holidays from then on throughout the Roman Empire.[77]

The Solemnity of the Assumption on 15 August was celebrated in the Eastern Church from the 6th century. The Western Church adopted this date as a Holy Day of Obligation to commemorate the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a reference to the belief in a real, physical elevation of her sinless soul and incorrupt body into Heaven.

Public holidays

15 August marks the earliest recorded Marian celebration, maintaining its status as a mandatory holy day and gaining even deeper theological weight after the 1950 papal dogma of the Assumption. Its historical roots trace back to ancient Palestine, where an early 6th-century eulogy on Saint Theodosius by Bishop Theodore of Petra recorded that local monks annually honored the Mother of God through a solemn memorial feast. As referred above, emperor Mauritius in 602 established the feast as a public holiday across his dominions. Its official title was the "Falling Asleep of the Mother of God" (Koίμησις Θεοτόκου).[78]

Assumption Day is today a nationwide public holiday in Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chile, Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia,[79] Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, East Timor, France, Gabon, Greece, Georgia, Republic of Guinea, Haiti, Italy, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of North Macedonia, Madagascar, Malta, Mauritius, Monaco, Montenegro (Albanian Catholics), Paraguay, Philippines (Maragondon, Cavite), Poland (coinciding with Polish Army Day), Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tahiti, Togo, and Vanuatu;[80] and was also in Hungary until 1948.

It is also a public holiday in parts of Germany (parts of Bavaria and Saarland), Switzerland (in 14 of the 26 cantons) and Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Guatemala, it is observed in Guatemala City and in the town of Santa Maria Nebaj, both of which claim her as their patron saint.[81] Also, this day is combined with Mother's Day in Costa Rica and parts of Belgium.

Prominent Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox countries in which Assumption Day is an important festival but is not recognised by the state as a public holiday include the Czech Republic, Ireland, Mexico, the Philippines and Russia. In Bulgaria, the Feast of the Assumption is the biggest Eastern Orthodox Christian celebration of the Holy Virgin. Celebrations include liturgies and votive offerings. In Varna, the day is celebrated with a procession of a holy icon, and with concerts and regattas.[82]

In many places, religious parades and popular festivals are held to celebrate this day. In Canada, Assumption Day is the Fête Nationale of the Acadians, of whom she is the patroness saint. Some businesses close on that day in heavily francophone parts of New Brunswick, Canada. The Virgin Assumed in Heaven is also patroness of the Maltese Islands and her feast, celebrated on 15 August, apart from being a public holiday in Malta it is also celebrated with great solemnity in the local churches especially in the seven localities known as the Seba' Santa Marijiet. The Maltese localities which celebrate the Assumption of Our Lady are: Il-Mosta, Il-Qrendi, Ħal Għaxaq, Il-Gudja, Ħ'Attard, L-Imqabba and Victoria. The hamlet of Praha, Texas, holds a festival during which its population swells from approximately 25 to 5,000 people.

In Anglicanism and Lutheranism, the feast is now often kept, but without official use of the word "Assumption". In Eastern Orthodox churches following the Julian Calendar, the feast day of Assumption of Mary falls on 28 August.

In the Maronite Church, the Assumption of Mary is known as the 'Assumption of the Holy Mother of God' and is celebrated on 15 August. This feast holds a significant place in the Maronite liturgical calendar, reflecting the deep veneration of Mary within the church.

The Maronite liturgy for the Assumption includes unique prayers and hymnody that celebrate Mary's assumption into heaven. The celebration often features processions and pilgrimages to Marian shrines, with the Our Lady of Harissa shrine in Harissa, Lebanon, being a particularly notable site where thousands of pilgrims gather each year to honor Mary on her feast day.

The celebration of the Assumption in the Maronite Church underscores its connection to the universal Christian tradition while preserving its distinct Syriac heritage and practices.

Art

The earliest known use of the Dormition is found on a sarcophagus in the crypt of a church in Zaragoza in Spain dated c. 330.[30] The Assumption became a popular subject in Western Christian art, especially from the 12th century, and especially after the Reformation, when it was used to refute the Protestants and their downplaying of Mary's role in salvation.[83] Angels commonly carry her heavenward where she is to be crowned by Christ, while the Apostles below surround her empty tomb as they stare up in awe.[83] Caravaggio, the "father" of the Baroque movement, caused a stir by depicting her as a decaying corpse, quite contrary to the doctrine promoted by the church;[84] more orthodox examples include works by El Greco, Rubens, Annibale Carracci, and Nicolas Poussin, the last replacing the Apostles with putti throwing flowers into the tomb.[83]

References

  1. 1.John Paul II, Redemptoris MaterMary's pilgrimage of faith, maternal role, presence in the Church, and eschatological glorification
  2. 2.United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Revelation 12The woman clothed with the sun, the messianic child, conflict with the dragon, and the ecclesial-Marian scriptural pattern
  3. 3.John Damascene, Homily II on the DormitionClassical Eastern patristic witness to Mary's death, tomb, bodily translation, and glorification through her Son
  4. 4.Francis, Angelus for the Assumption, 15 August 2019Mary's Magnificat, embodied glorification, service, humility, and the feast's pastoral meaning
  5. 5.Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy, 180–181The Assumption, Dormition, Marian days in August, popular customs, and their proper relation to liturgy
  6. 6.Paul VI, Marialis cultusBiblical, liturgical, Christological, ecclesial, and ecumenical principles for Marian worship including the Assumption
  7. 7.Pius XII, Deiparae Virginis MariaeConsultation of the world's bishops concerning the definability of Mary's bodily Assumption and the devotion of the faithful
  8. 8.Pius XII, Munificentissimus DeusThe solemn definition, its biblical and traditional foundations, episcopal consultation, liturgical witness, and theological fittingness
  9. 9.Catechism of the Catholic Church, 963–975Mary's motherhood in the order of grace, Assumption, queenship, ecclesial typology, and eschatological hope
  10. 10.John Paul II, General Audience: Mary's DormitionThe traditional teaching that Mary experienced death in conformity with Christ and the limits of the 1950 definition
  11. 11.Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, chapter VIIIMary in the mystery of Christ and the Church, her Assumption, maternal intercession, and role as eschatological sign
  12. 12.Benedict XVI, Angelus for the Solemnity of the Assumption, 15 August 2010The Assumption as fulfillment of grace, bodily hope, communion with God, and sign for the Church
  13. 13.United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1 Corinthians 15Christ as first fruits, bodily resurrection, transformation, incorruption, and the victory over death shared by the redeemed
  14. 14.Code of Canon Law, canons 1246–1248The Assumption among holy days of obligation and the competence governing observance, transfer, and participation
  15. 15.[15.2][15.3][15.4]Pius XII (1 November 1950). "Munificentissimus Deus". Holy See.
  16. 16.Collinge 2012, p. 53.
  17. 17."The Blessed Virgin Mary and Christology". Indiana District LCMS. Retrieved 16 August 2025.
  18. 18.[18.2]"The Calendar". Prayerbook.ca. p. ix. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
  19. 19.[19.2]The Episcopal Church. "Saint Mary the Virgin: Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ". Liturgical Calendar. New York: The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, The Episcopal Church. Archived from the original on 17 July 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
  20. 20.[20.2]Shoemaker, Stephen. "The Ancient Dormition Apocrypha and the Origins of Marian Piety: Early Evidence of Marian Intercession from Late Ancient Palestine (uncorrected page proofs)".
  21. 21.Shoemaker, Stephen. "The Ancient Dormition Apocrypha and the Origins of Marian Piety: Early Evidence of Marian Intercession from Late Ancient Palestine (uncorrected page proofs)". Self-published: 29. emphasis on the soteriological importance of esoteric knowledge, reference to numerous gnostic "technical terms," and the presence of a common gnostic cosmological myth, all of which suggest an origin in the third century, if not even earlier" "the idea that Mary could have sinned (as separate from the question of her Immaculate Conception in the Western Church) seems to have belonged to the second century, where it is voiced by Irenaeus and Tertullian
  22. 22.Shoemaker 2016, p. 24.
  23. 23.[23.2]Shoemaker 2016, p. 25.
  24. 24.[24.2]Truglia, Patrick (2021). "Original Sin in The Byzantine Dormition Narratives" (PDF). Revista Teologica (4). p. 9 (Footnote 30).
  25. 25.Schaff, Philip. "The Twelve Patriarchs, Excerpts and Epistles, The Clementia, Apocrypha, Decretals, Memoirs of Edessa and Syriac Documents, Remains of the First Age". Christian Classics Ethereal Library. ANF08. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
  26. 26.Shoemaker 2002, pp. 11–12, 26.
  27. 27.[27.2]Shoemaker 2002, p. 14.
  28. 28.Shoemaker, Stephen J. (2008). "Epiphanius of Salamis, the Kollyridians, and the Early Dormition Narratives: The Cult of the Virgin in the Fourth Century". Journal of Early Christian Studies 16 (3): 371–401. ISSN 1086-3184.
  29. 29.Holweck, Frederick (1907). Catholic Encyclopedia: Assumption of Mary. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 30 July 2024 – via New Advent.
  30. 30.[30.2]Zirpolo 2018, p. 213.
  31. 31.Alban Butler, Paul Burns (1998). Butler's Lives of the Saints. ISBN 0860122573. pp. 140–141
  32. 32.William Saunders (1996). "The Assumption of Mary". EWTN. Archived 16 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  33. 33."The Dormition of the Mother of God – Saint Joseph Orthodox Church". Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  34. 34.John Wortley (2005). "The Marian Relics at Constantinople". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 45. pp. 171–187, esp. 181–182.
  35. 35.Jenkins 2015, p. unpaginated.
  36. 36.Elliott, J. K. (27 October 2005). The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 691. ISBN 978-0-19-826181-0. Retrieved 15 August 2024.
  37. 37.Shoemaker 2002, p. 3.
  38. 38.Shoemaker, Stephen J. "(Ps.-)Joseph of Arimathea, The Passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary". Archived from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  39. 39.Ante-Nicene Fathers. The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325, vol. 8 p. 594
  40. 40.[40.2]Warner 2016, p. 91.
  41. 41.O'Carroll, Michael (1983). Theotokos: A Theological Encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Glazier. pp. 55–57. ISBN 978-0-907271-11-6. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  42. 42.Wagner 2020, p. 95.
  43. 43.[43.2]O'Carroll 2000, p. 56.
  44. 44.Munificentissimus Deus, No. 42
  45. 45.Catechism of the Catholic Church #966. Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  46. 46.Monzo, Rafael. Homage to Marie Louise von Frantz. p. 413.
  47. 47.Meistermann, B. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary". www.newadvent.org. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  48. 48.Shoemaker 2002, pp. 18–20.
  49. 49.Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Directory on popular pietey and the liturgy, No. 181, Vatican City, 2001
  50. 50.Shoemaker 2002, p. 12.
  51. 51.Saunder, William (2004). "Woman Clothed with the Sun". Arlington Catholic Herald. Catholic Education Resource Center. Archived from the original on 13 July 2013. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
  52. 52.[52.2]Miravalle 2006, p. 73.
  53. 53.Taylor, Edward K. (1961). "The Woman of Cana". The Furrow. 12 (5): 304–310. ISSN 0016-3120. JSTOR 27658099.
  54. 54."Catechism of the Catholic Church – IntraText". Holy See. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  55. 55.Williamson, Peter (2015). Catholic Christian Commentary on Sacred Scripture: Revelation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. pp. 205–220. ISBN 978-0801036507.
  56. 56."Assumption of Mary: Scriptural Support". University of Dayton, Ohio.
  57. 57.Clark, Anne L. (1992). Elisabeth of Schönau: a twelfth-century visionary. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 382. ISBN 9780812231236.
  58. 58."Gilles Bouhours". Santi, beati e testimone. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
  59. 59.The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 ISBN 1402208065 p. 64
  60. 60.Shoemaker 2016, p. 201
  61. 61.Witała, Maciej (16 December 2021). "Proposition of a Modern Theological Interpretation of Death as a Consequence of Sin". Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne. 39 (39): 40–41. doi:10.14746/pst.2021.39.02. ISSN 2451-2273.
  62. 62.John Paul II. "General Audience 25 June 1997". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  63. 63.See "Three Sermons on the Dormition of the Virgin" by John of Damascus, from the Medieval Sourcebook
  64. 64.Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, in: Festal Menaion [London: Faber and Faber, 1969], p. 64.
  65. 65.[65.2]Beane, Larry (15 August 2019). "The Feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary". Gottesdienst.org. Retrieved 27 May 2021. Many early Lutherans retained the Feast of the Assumption in the liturgical calendar, while recognizing it as a speculation rather than a dogma. However, Pope Pius XII dogmatized this belief in 1950 in his decree Munificentissimus Dei (sic), thus imposing it as doctrine upon Roman Catholics. ... Today's feast is described in Lutheran Service Book as 'St. Mary, Mother of our Lord'.
  66. 66.Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the adiaphora."
  67. 67.[67.2]Williams, Paul (2007). p. 253, incl. note 54.
  68. 68.The Church of England, official website: The Calendar. Accessed 17 July 2018
  69. 69.The Scottish Episcopal Church, official website: Calendar and Lectionary. Accessed 17 July 2018
  70. 70."Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ". Vatican.va. 26 June 2000. Retrieved 3 November 2013. There is no direct testimony in Scripture concerning the end of Mary's life. However, certain passages give instances of those who follow God's purposes faithfully being drawn into God's presence. Moreover, these passages offer hints or partial analogies that may throw light on the mystery of Mary's entry into glory.
  71. 71.De origine erroris libri duo [On the Origin of Error, Two Books] [1]. "In the De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in 4 ° (Zurich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work." The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (c. 1540–1617), Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, ISBN 978-9514109447, p. 175
  72. 72.Froschauer. De origine erroris, Caput XVI (Chapter 16), p. 70
  73. 73.The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary (1996), George H. Tavard, Liturgical Press ISBN 978-0814659144, p. 109. [2]
  74. 74."Dormition of the Theotokos". goarch.org. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. Retrieved 22 June 2025.
  75. 75."The Fasting Seasons | Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese". Archived from the original on 5 February 2021.
  76. 76.Pianigiani, Ottorino (1907). "Vocabolario etimologico della lingua italiana".
  77. 77.Giebel, Marion (1984). Augustus. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. p. 6. ISBN 3499503271.
  78. 78."Liturgical Year : Activities : The Feast of the Assumption Customs and Traditions". www.catholicculture.org. Retrieved 15 August 2026.
  79. 79."Zakon o blagdanima, spomendanima i neradnim danima u Republici Hrvatskoj". Narodne novine (in Croatian). 14 November 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2024.
  80. 80.Columbus World Travel Guide, 25th ed.
  81. 81.Reiland, Catherine. "To Heaven Through the Streets of Guatemala City: the Processions of the Virgin of the Assumption". Emisferica. Archived from the original on 22 December 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  82. 82."The Assumption of Mary into Heaven, the most revered summer Orthodox Christian feast in Bulgaria". bnr.bg.
  83. 83.[83.2][83.3]Zirpolo 2018, p. 83.
  84. 84.Zirpolo 2018, pp. 213–214.