Jump to content

Conclave

From Catholicism Wiki
The 1492 papal conclave was the first to be held in the Sistine Chapel.

A conclave is a gathering of the College of Cardinals convened to appoint the pope of the Catholic Church. Catholics consider the pope to be the apostolic successor of Saint Peter and the earthly head of the Catholic Church.[1]

From the Apostolic Age until 1059, the pope, like other bishops, was chosen by the consensus of the clergy (priests and deacons) and laity of the diocese.[2] In 1059, the body of electors was more precisely defined, when the College of Cardinals was designated the sole body of electors.[3]

Concerns around political interference led to reforms after the interregnum of 1268–1271 and Pope Gregory X's decree during the Second Council of Lyons in 1274 that the cardinal electors should be locked in seclusion cum clave (Latin for 'with a key') and not permitted to leave until a new pope had been elected.[4] Conclaves are now held in the Sistine Chapel of the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City.[5]

Since then, other details of the procedures have developed. In 1970, Pope Paul VI limited the electors to cardinals under 80 years of age in Ingravescentem aetatem. The current procedures established by Pope John Paul II in Universi Dominici gregis[5] were slightly amended in 2007 and 2013 by Pope Benedict XVI.[6]

A two-thirds supermajority vote is required to elect the new pope.[7][8]

Historical development

The procedures for the election of the pope developed over almost two millennia. Until the College of Cardinals was created in 1059, the bishops of Rome, like those in other areas, were elected by acclamation of the local clergy and people. Procedures similar to the present system were introduced in 1274 when Gregory X promulgated Ubi periculum following the action of the magistrates of Viterbo during the interregnum of 1268–1271.[9]

The process was further refined by Gregory XV with his 1621 papal bull Aeterni Patris Filius, which established the requirement of a two-thirds majority of cardinal electors to elect a pope.[10] The Third Council of the Lateran had initially set the requirement that two-thirds of the cardinals were needed to elect a pope in 1179.[11] This requirement had varied since then, depending on whether the winning candidate was allowed to vote for himself, in which cases the required majority was two-thirds plus one vote. Aeterni Patris Filius prohibited this practice and established two-thirds as the standard needed for election.[12]

Aeterni Patris Filius did not eliminate the possibility of election by acclamation, but did require that a secret ballot take place first before a pope could be elected.[13] Prior to 1621, a cardinal could vote for himself, but it was always with the knowledge and consent of enough of the other voting cardinals, so that he did not make the final decision to make himself pope (accessus). Ballots were either signed or initialed in the corner of the ballot, or sometimes coded and numbered.[14]

Electorate

As early Christian communities emerged, they elected bishops, chosen by the clergy and laity with the assistance of the bishops of neighbouring dioceses.[2] Cyprian (died 258) says that Pope Cornelius (in office 251–253) was chosen as bishop of Rome "by the decree of God and of His Church, by the testimony of nearly all the clergy, by the college of aged bishops [sacerdotum], and of good men".[15] As in other dioceses, the clergy of the Diocese of Rome was the electoral body for the bishop of Rome. Instead of casting votes, the bishop was selected by general consensus or by acclamation. The candidate was then submitted to the people for their general approval or disapproval. This lack of precision in the election procedures occasionally gave rise to rival popes or antipopes.[16]

The right of the laity to reject the person elected was abolished by a synod held in the Lateran in 769, but restored to Roman noblemen by Pope Nicholas I during a synod of Rome in 862.[16] The pope was also subjected to oaths of loyalty to the Holy Roman emperor, who had the duty of providing security and public peace in Rome.[17] A major change came in 1059, when Pope Nicholas II decreed in In nomine Domini that the cardinals were to elect a candidate to take office after receiving the assent of the clergy and laity. The cardinal bishops were to meet first and discuss the candidates before summoning the cardinal priests and cardinal deacons for the actual vote.[15] The Second Council of the Lateran in 1139 removed the requirement for obtaining the assent of the lower clergy and the laity,[16] while the Third Council of the Lateran in 1179 gave equal rights to the entire College of Cardinals when electing a new pope.[18]

Through much of the Middle Ages and Renaissance the Catholic Church had only a small number of cardinals at any one time, as few as seven under either Pope Alexander IV (1254–1261)[19] or Pope John XXI (1276–1277).[20][21] The difficulty of travel further reduced the number arriving at conclaves. The small electorate magnified the significance of each vote and made it all but impossible to displace familial or political allegiances. Conclaves lasted months and even years. In his 1274 decree requiring the electors be locked in seclusion, Gregory X also limited each cardinal elector to two servants and rationed their food progressively when a conclave reached its fourth and ninth days.[16]

The cardinals disliked these rules; Pope Adrian V temporarily suspended them in 1276 and John XXI's Licet felicis recordationis revoked them later that same year.[22][23] Lengthy elections resumed and continued to be the norm until 1294, when Pope Celestine V reinstated the 1274 rules.[24] Long interregna followed: in 1314–1316 during the Avignon Papacy, where the original conclaves were dispersed by besieging mercenaries and not reconvened for almost two years;[25] and in 1415–1417, as a result of the Western Schism.

Until 1899, it was a regular practice to generally include a few lay members in the Sacred College. These were often prominent nobility, or monks who were not priests, and in all cases, celibacy was required. With the death of Teodolfo Mertel in 1899, this practice was ended.[26] In 1917, the Code of Canon Law promulgated that year, explicitly stated that all cardinals must be priests. Since 1962, all cardinals have been bishops, with the exception of a few priests who have been made cardinals since about 1970. These few have all been at least 80 years old and not allowed to vote in a papal election, since Paul VI in that same year of 1970 imposed the rule that all voting cardinals be under 80 years of age. If a priest is asked by the pope to become a cardinal he may request not to be ordained a bishop, but this is the exception rather than the rule.

In 1587, Pope Sixtus V limited the number of cardinals to 70, following the precedent of Moses who was assisted by 70 elders in governing the Children of Israel: 6 cardinal bishops, 50 cardinal priests, and 14 cardinal deacons.[19] Beginning with the attempts of Pope John XXIII (1958–1963) to broaden the representation of nations in the College of Cardinals, that number has increased. In 1970 Paul VI ruled that cardinals who reach the age of 80 before the start of a conclave are ineligible to participate.[27]

In 1975, he limited the number of cardinal electors to 120.[28] Though this remains the theoretical limit, all of his successors have exceeded it for short periods of time. John Paul II (in office 1978–2005) made a slight change to the age limit rules, barring cardinals 80 or older from serving as electors if they reach that age before the papacy becomes vacant.[5] This change eliminated the possibility of scheduling a conclave to include or exclude a cardinal who might be close to the limit. The 2025 papal conclave was the first time that more than 120 cardinal-electors participated, at 133.

Choice of electors and of candidates

Originally, lay status did not bar election to the See of Rome. Bishops of dioceses were sometimes elected while still catechumens, such as the case of St. Ambrose,[29] who became bishop of Milan in 374. In the wake of the violent dispute over the 767 election of Antipope Constantine II, Pope Stephen III held the synod of 769, which decreed that only a cardinal priest or cardinal deacon could be elected, specifically excluding those that are already bishops.[15][30] Church practice deviated from this rule as early as 817 and fully ignored it from 882 with the election of Pope Marinus I, the bishop of Caere.[31]

Nicholas II, in the synod of 1059, formally codified existing practice by decreeing that preference was to be given to the clergy of Rome, but leaving the cardinal bishops free to select a cleric from elsewhere if they so decided.[32] The Lateran Council of 1179 rescinded these restrictions on eligibility.[18] On 15 February 1559, Paul IV issued the papal bull Cum ex apostolatus officio, a codification of the ancient Catholic law that only Catholics can be elected popes, to the exclusion of non-Catholics, including former Catholics who have become public and manifest heretics.

Pope Urban VI in 1378 became the last pope elected from outside the College of Cardinals.[33] The last person elected as pope who was not already an ordained priest or deacon was the cardinal-deacon Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici, elected as Pope Leo X in 1513.[34] His successor, Pope Adrian VI, was the last to be elected, in 1522, in absentia.[35] Archbishop Giovanni Montini of Milan received several votes in the 1958 conclave though not yet a cardinal.[36][37] As the Catholic Church holds that women cannot be validly ordained, women are not eligible for the papacy.[38] Though the pope is the bishop of Rome, he need not be of Italian background. As of 2025, the four most recent conclaves have elected a Pole in 1978, a German in 2005, an Argentinian in 2013, and an American in 2025.

During the first millennium, popes were elected unanimously, at least in theory. After a decree by the Synod of Rome in 1059, some factions contended that a simple majority sufficed to elect. In 1179, the Third Council of the Lateran settled the question by calling for unanimity, but permitting the Pope to be elected by two-thirds majority, "if by chance, through some enemy sowing tares, there cannot be full agreement."[11][39] As cardinals were not allowed to vote for themselves after 1621, the ballots were designed to ensure secrecy while at the same time preventing self-voting.[40]

In 1945, Pope Pius XII removed the requirement for signed ballots[41] as well as the prohibition on a cardinal voting for himself, increasing the requisite majority to two-thirds plus one at all times.[42] His successor John XXIII immediately reinstated the two-thirds majority if the number of cardinal electors voting is divisible by three, with an additional vote required if the number is not divisible by three.[43] Paul VI reinstated Pius XII's procedure thirteen years later,[28] but John Paul II overturned it again.

In 1996, John Paul II's constitution allowed election by absolute majority if deadlock prevailed after thirty-three or thirty-four ballots,[5] thirty-four ballots if a ballot took place on the first afternoon of the conclave. In 2007, Benedict XVI rescinded John Paul II's change, which had effectively abolished the two-thirds majority requirement after 33 or 34 rounds of balloting, whereas any majority will suffice to block the election until such time that a simple majority is enough to elect the next pope. Benedict's recission reinstated the traditional requirement of a two-thirds majority, regardless of the number of balloting rounds during the conclave.[7][8]

Electors formerly made choices by accessus, acclamation (per inspirationem), adoration, compromise (per compromissum), or scrutiny (per scrutinium).[9]

  • Accessus was a method for cardinals to change their most recent vote to accede to another candidate in an attempt to reach the requisite two-thirds majority and end the conclave. This method was first disallowed by the cardinal dean at the 1903 conclave.[9] Pius XII abolished accessus in 1945.
  • With acclamation, the cardinals unanimously declared the new pope quasi afflati Spiritu Sancto (as if inspired by the Holy Spirit).[42] If this took place before any formal ballot had taken place, the method was called adoration,[44] but Pope Gregory XV excluded this method in 1621.[45][46]
  • To elect by compromise, a deadlocked college unanimously delegates the election to a committee of cardinals, whose choice they all agree to abide by.[42]
  • Scrutiny is election via the casting of secret ballots.

The last election by compromise was that of Pope John XXII in 1316, and the last election by acclamation was that of Pope Innocent XI in the 1676 conclave.[47] Universi Dominici gregis formally abolished the long-unused methods of acclamation and compromise in 1996, making scrutiny the only approved method for the election of a new pope.[5]

Secular influence

For a significant part of the Church's history, powerful monarchs and governments influenced the choice of its leaders. For example, the Roman emperors once held considerable sway in the elections of popes. In 418, Emperor Honorius settled a controversial election, upholding Pope Boniface I over the challenger Antipope Eulalius. On the request of Boniface I, Honorius ordered that in future cases, any disputed election would be settled by a fresh election.[48]

After the demise of the Western Roman Empire, influence passed to the Ostrogothic kings of Italy. In 533, Pope John II formally recognised the right of the Ostrogothic monarchs to ratify elections. By 537, the Ostrogothic monarchy had been overthrown, and power passed to the Byzantine emperors. A procedure was adopted whereby officials were required to notify the exarch of Ravenna upon the death of a pope before proceeding with the election.[49] Once the electors arrived at a choice, they were required to send a delegation to Constantinople requesting the emperor's consent, which was necessary before the individual elected could take office.[50]

Travel to and from Constantinople caused lengthy delays.[50] When Pope Benedict II (684–685) complained about them, Emperor Constantine IV (in office 654–685) acquiesced, ending the requirement for emperors to confirm elections. Thereafter, the emperor was only required to be notified.[51] The last pope to notify a Byzantine emperor was Zachary in 741.[52]

In the 9th century, the Carolingian Empire (and its successor, the Holy Roman Empire) came to exert control over papal elections. Charlemagne, emperor from 800 to 814, and Louis the Pious, emperor from 813 to 840 did not interfere with the Church. Lothair I, emperor from 817 to 855, claimed that an election could only take place in the presence of imperial ambassadors.[53] In 898, riots forced Pope John IX to recognise the superintendence of the Holy Roman emperor.[54][55] At the same time, the Roman nobility continued to exert great influence, especially during the tenth-century period known as saeculum obscurum, Latin for "the dark age".

In 1059, the same papal bull that restricted suffrage to the cardinals recognised the authority of the Holy Roman emperor, at the time Henry IV, but only as a concession made by the pope, declaring that the emperor had no authority to intervene in elections, except where permitted to do so by papal agreements.[32] Pope Gregory VII, in office 1073–1085, was the last pope to submit to the interference of the Holy Roman emperors. The breach between him and the Holy Roman Empire caused by the Investiture Controversy led to the abolition of the emperor's role.[56] In 1122, the Holy Roman Empire acceded to the Concordat of Worms, accepting the papal decision.[57]

From about 1600, certain Catholic monarchs claimed a jus exclusivae (right of exclusion), i.e. a veto over papal elections, exercised through a crown-cardinal. By an informal convention, each state claiming the veto could exercise the right, once per conclave. Therefore, a crown-cardinal did not announce his veto until the very last moment, when the candidate in question seemed likely to get elected. No vetoes could be employed after an election. After the Holy Roman Empire dissolved in 1806, its veto power devolved upon the Austrian Empire. The last exercise of the veto occurred in 1903, when Prince Jan Puzyna de Kosielsko informed the College of Cardinals that Austria opposed the election of Mariano Rampolla. Consequently, the college elected Giuseppe Sarto as Pope Pius X, who issued the constitution Commissum nobis six months later, declaring that any cardinal who communicated his government's veto in the future would suffer excommunication latae sententiae.[58][59]

Seclusion and resolution

To resolve prolonged deadlocks in papal elections in the earlier years, local authorities often resorted to the forced seclusion of the cardinal electors, such as first in the city of Rome in 1241, and possibly before that in Perugia in 1216.[60] In 1268, when the forced seclusion of the cardinals failed to produce a pope, the city of Viterbo refused to send in any materials except bread and water. When even this failed to produce a result, the townspeople removed the roof of the Palazzo dei Papi in their attempt to speed up the election. It lasted for two years and eight months and was the longest conclave in history.[61]

In 1274, in an attempt to avoid future lengthy elections, Gregory X introduced stringent rules, with the promulgation of Ubi periculum. Cardinals were to be secluded in a closed area and not accorded individual rooms. No cardinal was allowed, unless ill, to be attended by more than two servants. Food was supplied through a window to avoid outside contact.[62] After three days of the conclave, the cardinals were to receive only one dish a day. After another five days, they were to receive just bread and water. During the conclave, no cardinal was to receive any ecclesiastical revenue.[16][63] As of 2025, cooks and servers are also sworn to secrecy, and may not serve food such as ravioli and whole chicken, which may conceal messages.[64] During the 2025 conclave, meals were prepared by the nuns at the Domus Sanctae Marthae;[65] though cardinals were allowed to bring in their own snacks.[66]

In 1276, Adrian V abolished Gregory X's strict regulations. Celestine V, elected in 1294 following a two-year vacancy, restored them. In 1562, Pius IV issued a papal bull that introduced regulations relating to the enclosure of the conclave and other procedures. Gregory XV issued two bulls that covered the most minute of details relating to the election. The first, in 1621, concerned electoral processes. The other, in 1622, fixed the ceremonies to be observed. In December 1904, Pope Pius X issued an apostolic constitution consolidating almost all the previous rules, albeit with some changes, the Vacante sede apostolica.[67] John Paul II instituted several reforms in 1996.[9]

The location of the conclaves became fixed in the fourteenth century. Since the end of the Western Schism in 1417, they have taken place in Rome, except in 1799–1800, when French troops occupying Rome forced the election to be held in Venice, and normally in what, since the Lateran Treaties of 1929, has become the independent Vatican City State. Since 1846, when the Quirinal Palace was used, the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican has served as the location of the election. Popes have often fine-tuned the rules for the election of their successors: Pope Pius XII's Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis (1945) governed the conclave of 1958, Pope John XXIII's Summi Pontificis electio (1962) that of 1963, Pope Paul VI's Romano Pontifici eligendo (1975) the two conclaves of 1978, Pope John Paul II's Universi Dominici gregis (1996) that of 2005, and two amendments by Pope Benedict XVI (2007 and 2013) that of 2013 and 2025.

Modern practice

In 1996, John Paul II promulgated a new apostolic constitution, Universi Dominici gregis, which with slight modifications by Pope Benedict XVI now governs the election of the pope, abolishing all previous constitutions on the matter, but preserving many procedures that date to much earlier times. Under Universi Dominici gregis, the cardinals are to be lodged in a purpose-built edifice in Vatican City, the Domus Sanctae Marthae, but continue to vote in the Sistine Chapel.[68]

Several duties are performed by the dean of the College of Cardinals, who is always a cardinal bishop. If the dean is not entitled to participate in the conclave owing to age, his place is taken by the vice-dean, who is also always a cardinal bishop. If the vice-dean cannot participate, the senior cardinal bishop participating performs the functions.[69]

Since the College of Cardinals is a small body, there have been proposals that the electorate should be expanded. Proposed reforms include a plan to replace the College of Cardinals as the electoral body with the Synod of Bishops, which includes many more members. Under present procedure, the synod may only meet when called by the pope. Universi Dominici gregis explicitly provides that even if a synod or an ecumenical council is in session at the time of a pope's death, it may not conduct the election. Upon the pope's death, both bodies' proceedings are suspended, to be resumed only upon the order of the new pope.[70]

Death of a pope

The death of the pope is verified by the cardinal camerlengo, or chamberlain, who traditionally performed the task by calling out his baptismal (not papal) name. After confirming the death of the pope, the camerlengo pronounces the phrase "sede vacante" ("The throne is empty"). The camerlengo takes possession of the Ring of the Fisherman worn by the pope. The ring, along with the papal seal, is later destroyed before the College of Cardinals. The tradition originated to avoid forgery of documents, but today merely is a symbol of the end of the pope's reign.[71][72]

During the sede vacante, as the papal vacancy is known, certain limited powers pass to the College of Cardinals, which is convoked by the dean of the College of Cardinals. All cardinals are obliged to attend the general congregation of cardinals, except those whose health does not permit, or who are over eighty. Those older cardinals may choose to attend if they please as non-voting members.[73]

The particular congregation that deals with the day-to-day matters of the Church includes the cardinal camerlengo and the three cardinal assistants—one cardinal bishop, one cardinal priest and one cardinal deacon—chosen by lot. Every three days, new cardinal assistants are chosen by lot. The camerlengo and assistants are responsible, among other things, for maintaining the election's secrecy.[73]

The congregations must make certain arrangements in respect of the pope's burial, which by tradition takes place within four to six days of the pope's death, leaving time for pilgrims to see the dead pontiff, and occurs within a nine-day period of mourning known as the novemdiales (Latin for 'nine days'). The congregations also fix the date and time of the commencement of the conclave. The conclave normally takes place fifteen days after the death of the pope, but the congregations may extend the period to a maximum of twenty days in order to permit other cardinals to arrive in Vatican City.[74]

Resignation of a pope

A vacancy in the papal office may also result from a papal resignation. Until the resignation of Benedict XVI on 28 February 2013, no pope had resigned since Gregory XII in 1415.[75] In 1996, Pope John Paul II, in his apostolic constitution Universi Dominici gregis, anticipated the possibility of resignation when he specified that the procedures he set out in that document should be observed "even if the vacancy of the Apostolic See should occur as a result of the resignation of the Supreme Pontiff".[76]

In the case of a papal resignation, the Ring of the Fisherman is placed in the custody of the cardinal camerlengo; in the presence of the College of Cardinals, the camerlengo marks an "X" (for the cross) with a small silver hammer and chisel into the ring, disfiguring it so it may no longer be used for signing and sealing official papal documents.

In his book Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Signs of the Times, Pope Benedict XVI espoused the idea of resignation on health grounds, which already had some theological respectability.[77]

Before the sealing of the Sistine Chapel

The cardinals hear two sermons before the election: one before actually entering the conclave, and one once they are settled in the Sistine Chapel. In both cases, the sermons are meant to lay out the current state of the Church, and to suggest the qualities necessary for a pope to possess in that specific time. Among the conclave preachers include Cardinal Raniero Cantalamessa (who preached in 2005,[78] 2013,[79] and 2025[80]), Cardinal Tomáš Špidlík (in 2005),[81] Cardinal Prosper Grech (in 2013),[82] and Benedictine Abbot Donato Ogliari (in 2025).[83]

On the morning of the day designated by the congregations of cardinals, all members of the College of Cardinals, both electors and non-electors, assemble in Saint Peter's Basilica to celebrate Mass, to be presided by the Dean of the College of Cardinals, regardless whether he is an elector or not. Then the cardinal-electors gather in the afternoon in the Pauline Chapel in the Apostolic Palace and process to the Sistine Chapel while singing the Litany of the Saints. When the electors have entered the chapel and the Litany is concluded, they sing the "Veni Creator Spiritus", invoking the Holy Spirit,[84] then take an oath to observe the procedures set down by the apostolic constitutions; to, if elected, defend the liberty of the Holy See; to maintain secrecy; and to disregard the instructions of secular authorities on voting. The senior cardinal reads the oath aloud in full. In order of precedence the other cardinal electors repeat the oath, while touching the Gospels. Where their rank is the same, their seniority is taken as precedence. The oath is:[85]

Et ego [prænomen] Cardinalis [nomen] spondeo, voveo ac iuro. Sic me Deus adiuvet et haec Sancta Dei Evangelia, quae manu mea tango.

And I, [forename] Cardinal [surname], do so promise, pledge, and swear. So help me God and these Holy Gospels, which I touch with my hand.

Expelling the outsiders

After all the cardinals present have taken the oath, the master of papal liturgical celebrations orders all individuals other than the cardinal electors and conclave participants to leave the chapel. Traditionally, he stands at the door of the Sistine Chapel and calls out: "Extra omnes!" (Latin for 'Outside, all [of you]'). He then closes the door.[86] In modern practice, the master need not stand at the door to perform this duty. During the 2005 conclave, 2013 conclave and 2025 conclave, the masters Piero Marini, Guido Marini and Diego Ravelli respectively, gave the command through a microphone while standing in front of the altar, then went to close the chapel doors after the outsiders had left.[87][88]

The master himself may remain, as may one ecclesiastic designated by the congregations prior to the commencement of the election. The ecclesiastic makes a speech concerning the problems facing the Church and on the qualities the new pope needs to have. After the speech concludes, the ecclesiastic leaves. Following the recitation of prayers, the senior cardinal asks if any doubts relating to procedure remain. After the clarification of the doubts, if any, the election proper may commence. Cardinals who arrive after the conclave has begun are admitted nevertheless. A cardinal who becomes ill or needs to use the restroom may leave the conclave and later be readmitted, but a cardinal who leaves for any other reason may not return.[89]

Although in the past cardinal electors could be accompanied by attendants ("conclavists"), now the only permitted attendant is a nurse if the Congregation of Cardinals confirms that a cardinal in ill-health requires one. A nurse is permitted during the period of election if necessary. The secretary of the College of Cardinals, the master of papal liturgical celebrations, two masters of ceremonies, two officers of the Papal Sacristy and an ecclesiastic assisting the dean of the College of Cardinals are admitted to the conclave. Priests are available to hear confessions in different languages. Two doctors are also admitted. A strictly limited number of servant staff are permitted for housekeeping and the preparing and serving of meals. All require prior approval from the Cardinal Camerlengo and the three Cardinal Assistants.[5]

Secrecy is maintained during the conclave. The cardinals and staff are forbidden to disclose any information relating to the election. They may not correspond or converse with anyone outside the conclave by any means. Violating this oath, or an outsider eavesdropping, is punished by excommunication latae sententiae. Only three cardinal electors are permitted to communicate with the outside world under grave circumstances, with the prior approval of the college, to fulfill their duties: the Major Penitentiary, the cardinal vicar for the Diocese of Rome, and the vicar general for the Vatican City State.[5]

Before the conclave that elected Pope Francis, the Sistine Chapel was "swept" to detect any hidden "bugs" or surveillance devices. There were no reports that any were found, but in previous conclaves press reporters who had disguised themselves as conclave servants were discovered. Universi Dominici gregis specifically prohibits media such as newspapers, the radio, and television.[90] Wi-Fi access is blocked in Vatican City. Wireless signal jammers are deployed at the Sistine Chapel to prevent any form of electronic communications to or from the cardinal electors.[91] In addition, cardinal-electors are required to surrender their electronic devices upon taking residence at Domus Sanctae Marthae for the conclave.[92][93]

Voting

On the afternoon of the first day, one ballot (referred to as a "scrutiny") may be held, but is not required. A maximum of four ballots are held on each successive day: two in each morning and two in each afternoon. Before voting in the morning and again before voting in the afternoon, the electors take an oath to obey the rules of the conclave.[7]

If no result is obtained after three vote days of balloting, the process is suspended for a maximum of one day for prayer and an address by the senior cardinal deacon. After seven further ballots, the process may again be similarly suspended, with the address now being delivered by the senior cardinal priest. If, after another seven ballots, no result is achieved, voting is suspended once more, the address being delivered by the senior cardinal bishop.[7]

After a further seven ballots, there shall be a day of prayer, reflection and dialogue. In the following ballots, only the two names who received the most votes in the last ballot shall be eligible in a runoff election where a two-thirds majority is still required. The two people voted on, even if cardinal electors, shall not themselves have the right to vote.[7]

The process of voting consist of three phases: the "pre-scrutiny", the "scrutiny", and the "post-scrutiny".

Pre-scrutiny

During the pre-scrutiny, the masters of ceremonies prepare ballot papers bearing the words Eligo in Summum Pontificem ('I elect as Supreme Pontiff') and provide at least two to each cardinal elector. As the cardinals begin to write their votes, the secretary of the College of Cardinals, the master of papal liturgical celebrations and the masters of ceremonies exit. The junior cardinal deacon then closes the door.[94]

During the first pre-scrutiny of any given morning, the junior cardinal deacon randomly draws nine names. The first three cardinals so chosen become scrutineers, the second three infirmarii and the last three revisers. These cardinals retain their roles for the second scrutiny of the morning, if it is needed.[94]

If both morning scrutinies fail to produce a result, the cardinals re-take the oath to obey the rules of the conclave once they have eaten lunch and again gathered in the Sistine Chapel. A drawing is held to choose new scrutineers, infirmarii, and revisers, and the third scrutiny of the day is then held, immediately followed by a fourth if necessary.[94]

No changes in these rules were made by Benedict XVI in 2007. These were the rules followed so far as is known, given the secrecy of the conclave in electing Leo XIV in May 2025.

Scrutiny

In order of precedence, the cardinals approach the scrutineers at the altar and deposit their ballots into a receptacle there. Each ballot bears only the name of the candidate selected by its holder, who recites the following Latin oath before casting it:

Testor Christum Dominum, qui me iudicaturus est, me eum eligere, quem secundum Deum iudico eligi debere.

I call as my witness Christ the Lord, who is to judge me, that I choose him whom according to God I judge ought to be elected.

If any cardinal elector is in the chapel, but cannot proceed to the altar due to infirmity, the last scrutineer may go to him and take his ballot after he has recited the oath. If any cardinal electors are confined to their rooms for this reason, the infirmarii go to their rooms with ballot papers and a box. These cardinals fill out their ballots, recite the oath, and place them in the box. When the infirmarii return to the chapel, the ballots are counted to ensure that their number matches with the number of ill cardinals, whereupon they are transferred to the receptacle holding the ballots cast by those in the chapel.

If no candidate receives a two-thirds vote on the first scrutiny, then a second scrutiny immediately follows. A maximum of four scrutinies can be carried out per day, two apiece in the morning and afternoon.

Under present rules, the oath that cardinals take when casting their votes is only verbal, since they no longer sign their names on the ballots. Previous rules required each cardinal to sign his ballot and mark it with a unique identification code, or motif. He then folded the ballot in two places to cover his signature and motif, leaving only the name of his chosen candidate exposed, and sealed it with wax to create a semi-secret ballot.[95]

The wax seals were opened only if a candidate received the bare minimum needed for election. This was to ensure that the apparently elected man had not voted for himself. This was the procedure from 1621 to 1945. The example above is a copy of the three section semi-secret ballot, which was last used in the conclave of 1939. There was no oath taken when actually casting ballots, prior to 1621.[95]

Semi-secret ballots with initials or motif written on the back of the ballot, or voting verbally, at the option of the cardinals present and voting, were sometimes used prior to 1621. These secret ballots had no oath taken when the vote was actually cast. At some conclaves prior to 1621, the cardinals verbally voted and sometimes stood in groups to facilitate counting the votes cast. The signature and motif of the elector covered by two folded-over parts of the ballot paper was added by Gregory XV in 1621, to prevent anyone from casting the deciding vote for himself, and also to insure semi-secrecy.[96]

In 1549, Cardinal Pole of England refused to cast the deciding vote for himself, which would then have been followed by the accession to raise his vote total to at least one more than the minimum number needed, and was not elected. In 1492, Cardinal Borgia (Pope Alexander VI) almost certainly privately bribed other cardinals to vote for him. It is certain that he would not have been allowed to cast the deciding vote for himself, without the knowledge and consent of the other cardinals. A procedure called accession gave electors who had not voted for the possible new pope the opportunity to change their votes and make the election unanimous, or nearly so, (except for the vote of the possible new pope). This is how Cardinal Borgia was elected pope in 1492.[96] To make accession work, each elector had to sign or code his ballot to later identify it, if he desired to change his vote to a different candidate.

Faced by the mortal challenge to the papacy emanating from Protestantism, and fearing schism due to several stormy conclaves in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, Gregory XV established the procedure of signed ballots with covering fold over flaps sealed with wax to prevent any cardinal from casting the deciding vote for himself. The accession was not ended, but was seldom used until Pius XII abolished it in 1945.[97] Since 1945, a cardinal can cast the deciding vote for himself without the accession, though the two-thirds majority rule has always been continued, except when John Paul II had modified that rule in 1996, after 33 ballots, a simple majority being sufficient. The two-thirds majority rule was restored in 2007 by Benedict XVI.[98]

Prior to 1621, the only oath taken was that of obedience to the rules of the conclave in force at that time, when the cardinals entered the conclave and the doors were locked, and each morning and afternoon as they entered the Sistine Chapel to vote. Gregory XV added the additional oath, taken when each cardinal casts his ballot, to prevent cardinals wasting time in casting "courtesy votes" and instead narrowing the number of realistic candidates for the papal throne to perhaps only two or three. Speed in electing a pope was important, and that meant using an oath so as to get the cardinals down to the serious business of electing a new pope and narrowing the number of potentially electable candidates.[99][100]

The reforms of Gregory XV in 1621 and reaffirmed in 1622 created the written detailed step-by-step procedure used in choosing a pope; a procedure that was essentially the same as the process used in 2025 to elect Pope Leo XIV. The biggest change since 1621 was the elimination of the rule that required the electors to sign their ballots, resulting in the detailed voting procedure of scrutiny making use of simple verbal oaths. Beginning in 1945, an elector could vote for himself and then call on God via the oath taken when the vote is dropped into the receptacle, to declare himself to be the best one qualified for the papacy. The use of the accession would prevent this, but is not allowed under the present rules.[99][100] Beginning with the use of totally secret ballots in the 1958 conclave, it is now possible for a cardinal to cast the deciding vote for himself, without the knowledge and consent of the other cardinals.

Once all votes have been cast, the first scrutineer chosen shakes the container, and the last scrutineer removes and counts the ballots. If the number of ballots does not correspond to the number of cardinal electors present, including sick cardinals in their rooms, the ballots are burnt, unread, and the vote is repeated. If no irregularities are observed, the ballots may be opened and the votes counted. Each ballot is unfolded by the first scrutineer. All three scrutineers separately write down the name indicated on the ballot. The last of the scrutineers reads the name aloud.

Once all of the ballots have been opened, the final post-scrutiny phase begins.

Post-scrutiny

The scrutineers add up all of the votes, and the revisers check the ballots and the names on the scrutineers' lists to ensure that no error has been made. The ballots are then stitched together with a needle and red thread and burned by the scrutineers with the assistance of the secretary of the College of Cardinals and the masters of ceremonies. If the first scrutiny held in any given morning or afternoon does not result in an election, the cardinals proceed to the next scrutiny immediately. The papers from both scrutinies are then burned together at the end of the second scrutiny.

Fumata

Beginning in the early 1800s, the ballots used by cardinals were burned after each ballot to indicate a failed election.[101][102] The lack of smoke instead signalled a successful election.[103][101] Since 1914, black smoke (fumata nera) emerging from a temporary chimney installed on the roof of the Sistine Chapel indicates that the ballot did not result in an election. White smoke (fumata bianca) announces that a new pope has been chosen.[104][105] Smoke is not necessarily issued after every unsuccessful election; when there has been two votes, the ballots from the two votes are burned together.[106]

Until 1945, when Pius XII changed the form of ballot to use the unsigned ballots first used in 1958, the sealing wax on the complex type ballots illustrated above had the effect of making the smoke from burning the ballots either black or white, depending on whether or not damp straw was added. Until the 20th century, sealing wax customarily had beeswax mixed into its composition. Burning wax made solely from animal fat does not give as much white smoke as does wax that includes beeswax.[107]

In the 1939 conclave, there was some confusion over the smoke color, which was even more apparent in the 1958 conclave. The lack of sealing wax on the ballots likely explains the confusion over the color of the smoke in the 1958 conclave. The Siri thesis was based on the confusion over the smoke color on the first day of that conclave.[108]

Since 1963 chemicals have been added to the burning process to augment the smoke's black or white color. Since 2005, a successful election has been announced by the bells of Saint Peter's Basilica ringing at the appearance of the white smoke.[109]

During the 2013 conclave, the Vatican disclosed the chemicals used.[110] The black smoke is made by adding potassium perchlorate, anthracene, and sulfur.[111] The white smoke is made by adding potassium chlorate, lactose, and pine rosin.[112] Sugar is burned to produce large amounts of gaseous output, primarily water vapor (steam) and carbon dioxide.[110] Pine rosin produces a "thick white smoke" when heated and contains terpenes, which burn to yield a pale, visible smoke.[110]

Acceptance and proclamation

Once the election concludes, the cardinal dean summons the secretary of the College of Cardinals and the master of papal liturgical celebrations into the hall. The dean then asks the pope-elect if he assents to the election, saying in Latin: Acceptasne electionem de te canonice factam in Summum Pontificem? ("Do you accept your canonical election as Supreme Pontiff?") There is no requirement that the pope-elect do so, and he is free to respond Non accepto ("I do not accept").

In practice, any cardinal who intends not to accept will explicitly state this before he receives a sufficient number of votes to become pope, as Giovanni Colombo did in October 1978.[113][114]

Consecration

If he accepts, and is already a bishop, he immediately takes office. If he is not a bishop, he must be first consecrated as one before he can assume office. If a priest is elected, the dean of the College of Cardinals consecrates him bishop. If a layman is elected, then the dean first ordains him deacon, then priest, and then consecrates him as bishop. After becoming a bishop the pope-elect takes office. These functions of the dean are assumed, if necessary, by the sub-dean. If the sub-dean is also impeded, they are assumed by the senior cardinal bishop in attendance.

Since the imposition of the age-restrictions on Cardinals aged 80 and older by Pope Paul VI in 1970, the Dean of the College of Cardinals has participated in a conclave only once, and has never confirmed the election of an elected Pope. Jean Marie Villot presided the August 1978 and October 1978 papal conclaves on behalf of then-Dean Carlo Confalonieri, and confirmed the elections of Albino Luciani and Karol Wojtyla, respectively. In 2005, because Joseph Ratzinger, the dean, was elected Pope, the duties of confirming the election fell into the hands of the vice-dean, Angelo Sodano. In 2013, Giovanni Battista Re was the senior cardinal bishop (who later became dean himself in 2020) who confirmed the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio. In 2025, the presiding cardinal over the conclave was Pietro Parolin, who confirmed the election of Robert Francis Prevost.

Papal name

Since 533, the new pope has also decided on his regnal name. Pope John II was the first to adopt a new papal name. He felt that his original name, Mercurius, was inappropriate, as it was also the name of a Roman god. In most cases, even if such considerations are absent, popes tend to choose papal names different from their baptismal names. The last pope to reign under his baptismal name was Pope Marcellus II (1555). After the newly elected pope accepts his election, the dean asks him about his papal name, saying in Latin: Quo nomine vis vocari? ("By what name do you wish to be called?"). After the pope-elect has taken time to think about the papal name he chooses (sometimes with some help from other cardinals), the officials are readmitted to the conclave, and the master of papal liturgical celebrations writes a document recording the acceptance and the new name of the pope.

Canopies

In the past, when the cardinals voted during a conclave, they sat on canopied thrones symbolizing the cardinals' collective governance of the church during the period of sede vacante.[115] Upon the acceptance by the new pope of his election, all other cardinals in attendance each pulled a cord and lowered the canopies above their respective thrones, signifying an end to the period of collective governance, with only the newly elected pope's canopy remained unlowered.[115] The last time canopied thrones were used was during the 1963 conclave.[116][117] Beginning with the August 1978 conclave, canopied thrones were no longer used due to the lack of space resulting from the large increase in the number of cardinal electors, necessitating two rows of seats (two on each side, a total of four). The amount of rows were bumped up to six (three each on the left and right side) in 2005 and 2013, and ten (forming a U-Shape) in 2025.

Secretary tradition

At the end of the conclave, the new pope could give his cardinalitial zucchetto or skull cap to the secretary of the conclave, indicating the secretary would be made cardinal at the next consistory to create cardinals. Prior to the 2013 conclave, this tradition was last followed at the 1958 conclave by the newly elected Pope John XXIII, who bestowed his cardinal's skull cap on Alberto di Jorio and created him a cardinal at the consistory on 15 December 1958. In 2013, the Portuguese section of Vatican Radio reported that at the conclusion of the 2013 conclave, the newly elected Pope Francis bestowed his cardinalitial zucchetto on Archbishop Lorenzo Baldisseri, the secretary of that conclave.[118] On 22 February 2014, at Pope Francis's first consistory, Baldisseri was formally made a cardinal with the title of Cardinal-Deacon of Sant'Anselmo all'Aventino.[119]

Room of Tears

The new pope goes to the Room of Tears, a small red room next to the Sistine Chapel. The room carries the nickname because of the strong emotions experienced by the new pope. The new pope dresses by himself, choosing a set of pontifical robes—consisting of a white cassock, rochet, and red mozzetta—from three sizes provided. He then dons a gold corded pectoral cross, a red and gold embroidered stole, and then the white papal zucchetto on his head. In 2013, Pope Francis departed from tradition by forgoing the red mozzetta, rochet, and gold pectoral cross, appearing on the central balcony in only the white cassock and his personal pectoral cross. He donned the stole solely to impart the apostolic blessing, removing it immediately afterward. In 2025, Pope Leo XIV chose to return to the traditional attire, appearing in the red mozzetta, rochet, gold pectoral cross, and stole.

Proclamation

Next, the protodeacon of the College of Cardinals, the senior cardinal deacon, appears at the loggia of the basilica to proclaim the new pope. He usually proceeds with the following traditional Latin formula, assuming that a cardinal has been elected:[120]

Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum;
habemus papam:
Eminentissimum ac Reverendissimum Dominum,
Dominum
[prænomen]
Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae Cardinalem [nomen]
qui sibi nomen imposuit [nomen pontificale].

I announce to you a great joy;
we have a pope:
The Most Eminent and Most Reverend Lord,
Lord [forename]
Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church [surname]
who has taken the name [papal name].

During the announcement for Pope Benedict XVI's election, the protodeacon, Cardinal Jorge Medina, first greeted the crowds with "Dear brothers and sisters" in several different languages before proceeding to the Latin announcement. This was not done when Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIV were elected.

In the past, the protodeacon has himself been elected pope. In such an event, the announcement is made by the next senior deacon, who has thus succeeded as protodeacon. The last time the cardinal protodeacon was elected was in 1513, when Giovanni de Medici was elected as Pope Leo X and the next senior cardinal deacon Alessandro Farnese (the future Pope Paul III) made the announcement. After the election of Pope Leo XIII in 1878, Protodeacon Prospero Caterini appeared and started to make the announcement but was physically incapable of completing it, so another made it for him.[121]

Following the announcement, the senior cardinal deacon retreats, and papal aides unfurl a large, maroon banner that out of practicality often bears the late pope's arms in the centre, draping it onto the railing of the basilica's loggia.[122] During John Paul II's announcement, the inner portion of the arms of Paul VI were simply covered due to the short pontificate of John Paul I not allowing sufficient time for a banner with the latter's arms to be created. For Francis's announcement, there was no image of his predecessor's arms due to Benedict XVI still being alive. For Leo XIV's announcement, the banner featured the arms of the Holy See. During Pope Pius XI's first appearance following his election at the 1922 conclave, the banner showed the arms of Pope Pius IX instead of the arms of his immediate predecessor Pope Benedict XV.[123]

The new pope then emerges onto the balcony to the adulation of the crowd, while a brass band in the forecourt below plays the Pontifical Anthem. He then imparts the Urbi et Orbi blessing. The pope may on this occasion choose to give the shorter episcopal blessing as his first apostolic blessing instead of the traditional Urbi et Orbi blessing. This happened most recently with Pope Paul VI after his election at the 1963 conclave.[124]

Beginning with Pope John Paul II, the last four popes elected, including Pope Leo XIV, have chosen to address the crowds first before imparting the Urbi et Orbi blessing. Also, at Pope Francis's first appearance, he first led the faithful in prayers for his predecessor and then asked them to pray for himself, before imparting the Urbi et Orbi blessing. Pope Leo XIV spoke in Spanish in part of his remarks, the first time a pope has used a language to address a crowd other than Italian following a conclave. Leo XIV was also the first observed to have used written notes while addressing the crowd.

Coronation and inauguration

Formerly, the popes were crowned by the triregnum, or triple tiara, at the papal coronation. All popes since John Paul I have refused an elaborate coronation, choosing instead to have a simpler papal inauguration ceremony.[125]

Relevant documents

In nomine Domini (1059)
Quia propter (1215)
Ubi periculum (1274)
Ne Romani (1312)
In Eligendis (1562)
Aeterni Patris Filius (1621)
Commissum Nobis (1904)
Vacante Sede Apostolica (1904)
Cum proxime (1922)
Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis (1945)
Summi Pontificis electio (1962)
Ingravescentem aetatem (1970)
Romano Pontifici eligendo (1975)
Universi Dominici gregis (1996)
De electione Romani Pontificis (2007)
Normas nonnullas (2013)
  • The Dan Brown novel Angels & Demons (2000), itself adapted onto a film in 2009, concerns four papabile being kidnapped right as the conclave starts, and their murders cause much concern to the other cardinals.[126]
  • A papal conclave is the subject of the 2024 film Conclave, itself adapted from a 2016 novel. While the cardinals and plot are fictional and dramatised, the rituals are correctly shown, according to experts. Some of the rituals include the sequestering in the Sistine Chapel, the burning of ballots, the use of smoke signals, and the destruction of a deceased pope's ring.[127]

See also

From the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia

Conclave — (Lat. cum, with, and clavis, key; a place that may be securely closed)

The closed room or hall specially set aside and prepared for the cardinals when electing a pope; also the assembly of the cardinals for the canonical execution of this purpose. In its present form the conclave dates from the end of the thirteenth century. Earlier methods of filling the See of Peter are treated in the article. In this article will be considered: (I) the history of the actual method of papal election; (II) the ceremonial itself.

I. History of the Conclave

In 1271 the election that ended with the choice of Gregory X at Viterbo had lasted over two years and nine months when the local authorities, weary of the delay, shut up the cardinals within narrow limits and thus hastened the desired election (Raynald, Ann. Eccl., ad ad. 1271). The new pope endeavoured to obviate for the future such scandalous delay by the law of the conclave, which, almost in spite of the cardinals, he promulgated at the fifth session of the Second Council of Lyons in 1274 (Hefele, Hist. des Conciles, IX, 29). It is the first occasion on which we meet with the word conclave in connection with papal elections. (For its use in English literature see Murray's "Oxford Dictionary", s. v., and for its medieval use Du Cange, Glossar. med. et infimæ Latinitatis, s. v.) The provisions of his Constitution "Ubi Periculum" were stringent. When a pope died, the cardinals with him were to wait ten days for their absent brethren. Then, each with a single servant, lay or cleric, they were to assemble in the palace where the pope was at his death, or, if that were impossible, the nearest city not under interdict, in the bishop's house or some other suitable place. All were to assemble in one room (conclave), without partition or hanging, and live in common. This room and another retired chamber, to which they might go freely, were to be so closed in that no one could go in or out unobserved, nor anyone from without speak secretly with any cardinal. And if anyone from without had aught to say, it must be on the business of the election and with the knowledge of all the cardinals present. No cardinal might send out any message, whether verbal or written, under pain of excommunication. There was to be a window through which food could be admitted. If after three days the cardinals did not arrive at a decision, they were to receive for the next five days only one dish at their noon and evening meals. If these five days elapsed without an election, only bread, wine, and water should be their fare. During the election they might receive nothing from the papal treasury, nor introduce any other business unless some urgent necessity arose imperilling the Church or its possessions. If any cardinal neglected to enter, or left the enclosure for any reason other than sickness, the election was to go on without him. But his health restored, he might re-enter the conclave and take up the business where he found it. The rulers of the city where the conclave was held should see to it that all the papal prescriptions concerning enclosure of the cardinals were observed. Those who disregarded the laws of the conclave or tampered with its liberty, besides incurring other punishments, were ipso facto excommunicated.

The stringency of these regulations at once aroused opposition; yet the first elections held in conclave proved that the principle was right. The first conclave lasted only a day and the next but seven days. Unfortunately there were three popes in the very year succeeding the death of Gregory X (1276). The second, Adrian V, did not live long enough to incorporate in an authoritative act his openly expressed opinion of the conclave. Pope John XX lived only long enough to suspend officially the "Ubi Periculum". Immediately the protracted elections recommenced. In the eighteen years intervening between the suspension of the law of the conclave in 1276 and its resumption in 1294 there were several vacancies of from six to nine months; that which preceded the election of Celestine V lasted two years and nine months. About the only notable act of the latter pope was to restore the conclave. Boniface VIII confirmed the action of his predecessor and ordered the "Ubi Periculum" of Gregory X to be incorporated in the canon law (c. 3, in VI°, I, 6), since which time all papal elections have taken place in conclave. Pope Gregory XI in 1378 empowered the cardinals (for that occasion only) to proceed to an election outside of conclave, but they did not do so. The Council of Constance (1417) modified the rules of the conclave to such an extent that the cardinals of the three "obediences" took part in it as well as six prelates from each of the five nations. This precedent (which however resulted happily in the election of the Roman, Martin V) is perhaps the reason why Julius II (1512), Paul III (1542), Pius IV (1561), and Pius IX (1870) provided that in case of their death during an ecumenical council the election of the new pope should be in the hands of the cardinals, not in those of the council. Pius IV by the Bull "In Eligendis" (1562) provided that the election might take place either in or out of the conclave, but this was revoked by Gregory XIII. This liberty of action is found again in the legislation (1798) of Pius VI (Quum nos superiore anno) which leaves it in the power of the cardinals to modify the rules of the conclave touching enclosure, etc. Again Pius IX by the Bull "In hac sublimi" (23 August, 1871) allowed a majority of the cardinals to dispense with the traditional enclosure. Other important documents of Pius IX dealing with the conclave are his Constitutions "Licet per Apostolicas Litteras" (8 September, 1874) and "Consulturi" (10 October, 1877), also his "Regolamento da osservarsi dal S. Collegio in occasione della vacanza dell'Apostolica Sede" (10 January, 1878).

As a matter of fact these precautions, taken in view of the danger of interference by secular governments, have so far been unnecessary, and elections of popes take place as they always did since the law of the conclave became finally effective. Many popes have legislated on this subject, either to confirm the actions of their predecessors or to define (or add to) previous legislation. Clement V decreed that the conclave must take place in the diocese in which the pope dies (Ne Romani, 1310) and also that all cardinals, whether excommunicated or interdicted, provided they were not deposed, should have the right to vote. Clement VI (1351) permitted a slight amelioration in the fare and in the strict practice of common life. In the sixteenth century Julius II (1505) by the Bull "Cum tam divino" declared invalid any simoniacal election of a pope. Following the example of Pope Symmachus (499), Paul IV, by the Bull "Cum Secundum" (1558), denounced and forbade all cabals and intrigues during the lifetime of a pope. The aforesaid Constitution of Pius IV "In Eligendis" (1562) is a codification and re-enactment of all the laws pertaining to the conclave since the time of Gregory X. In it he insists forcibly on the enclosure, which had come to be rather carelessly observed. The finally directive legislation on the conclave is that of Gregory XV. In his short reign (1621-1623) he published two Bulls, "Æterni Patris" (1621), and "Decet Romanum Pontificem" (1622), followed by a Cæremoniale for the papal election (Bullar. Luxemb., III, 444 sqq.). Every detail of the conclave is described in these documents. Subsequent legislation has either confirmed these measures, e.g. the "Romani Pontificis" of Urban VIII (1625), or regulated the expenditure of money on the papal obsequies, e.g. the Brief of Alexander VIII (1690), or determined their order, e.g. the "Chirografo" of Clement XII (1732). The more recent legislation of Pius VI, Pius VII, and Pius IX provides for all contingencies of interference by secular powers. Pius VI (who designated a Catholic country in which the majority of the cardinals happened to be) and Pius IX (who left the matter to the judgment of the Sacred College) allowed the widest liberty as to the place of the conclave.

II. Ceremonial of the Conclave

Immediately on the death of a pope the cardinal camerlengo who, as representative of the Sacred College, assumes charge of the papal household, verifies by a judicial act the death of the pontiff. In the presence of the household he strikes the forehead of the dead pope three times with a silver mallet, calling him by his baptismal name. The fisherman's ring and the papal seals are then broken. A notary draws up the act which is the legal evidence of the pope's death. The obsequies last nine days. Meanwhile the cardinals have been notified of the impending election and those resident in Rome (in Curia) await their absent brethren, assisting in the meantime at the functions for the deceased pontiff. All cardinals, and they alone, have the right to vote in the conclave; they must, however, be legitimately appointed, have the use of reason, and be present in person, not through a procurator or by letter. This right is acknowledged even if they are subject to ecclesiastical censures (e.g. excommunication), or if the solemn ceremonies of their "creation" have yet to be performed. During the aforesaid nine days, and until the election of a successor, all cardinals appear with uncovered rochets, just as all have canopies over their seats at the conclave, to show that the supreme authority is in the hands of the whole College. The cardinal camerlengo is assisted by the heads of the three cardinalitial orders, known as the "Capita Ordinum" (cardinal-bishops, -priests, -deacons). There are frequent meetings, or "congregations", of these four cardinals to determine every detail both of the obsequies of the pope and of the preparations for the conclave. All matters of importance are referred to the general congregations, which since 1870 are held in the Vatican. The cardinal dean (always the Bishop of Ostia) presides over these congregations, in which the cardinals take rank and precedence from the date of their elevation to the purple. Formerly they had also to provide for the government of the Papal States and to repress frequent disorders during the interregnum. In the first of these congregations the various Constitutions which govern the conclave are read and the cardinals take an oath to observe them. Then, in the following days, the various officers of the conclave, the conclavists, confessors, and physicians, servants of various kinds, are examined or appointed by a special commission. Each cardinal has a right to take into the conclave a secretary and a servant, the secretary being usually an ecclesiastic. In case of illness a third conclavist may be allowed, with agreement of the general congregation. All are equally sworn to secrecy and also not to hinder the election. After the conclave certain honorary distinctions and pecuniary emoluments are awarded to the conclavists.

Meanwhile a conclave, formerly a large room, now a large part of the Vatican palace, including two or three floors, is walled off, and the space divided into apartments, each with three or four small rooms or cells, in each of which are a crucifix, a bed, a table and a few chairs. Access to the conclave is free through one door only, locked from without by the Marshal of the Conclave (formerly a member of the Savelli, since 1721 of the Chigi, family), and from within by the cardinal camerlengo. There are four openings provided for the passage of food and other necessaries, guarded from within and without, on the exterior by the authority of the marshal and major-domo, on the interior by the prelate assigned to this duty by the three cardinals mentioned above, representative of the three cardinalitial orders. Once the conclave begins the door is not again opened until the election is announced, except to admit a cardinal who is late in arriving. All communication with the outside is strictly forbidden under pain of loss of office and ipso facto excommunication. A cardinal may leave the conclave in case of sickness (certified under oath by a phisician) and return; not so a conclavist. It may be noted at once, with Wernz, that a papal election held outside of a properly organized conclave is canonically null and void.

Within, the cardinals live with their conclavists in the cells. Formerly every cardinal had to provide his own food, which was carried in state by his men-in-waiting to one of the four openings nearest the cell of the prelate. Since 1878 the kitchen is a part of the conclave. Though all meals are taken in private they are served from a common quarter, but great care is taken to prevent written communication by this way. The cells of the cardinals are covered with cloth, purple if they are of the last pope's "creation", green if not. When they wish to be undisturbed they close the door of their cell, the frame-work of which is in the shape of a St. Andrew's cross. The conclave opens officially on the evening of the tenth day after the pope's decease, unless another day has been assigned. Every precaution is observed to exclude those who have no right within the enclosure, and also unnecessary communication with the outside. Papal legislation has long since forbidden the once customary "capitulations", or ante-election agreements binding on the new pope; it is also forbidden to cardinals to treat of the papal succession among themselves during the pope's lifetime; the pope may, however, treat of the matter with the cardinals. Absolutely necessary modifications of the conclave legislation, during the conclave itself, are temporary only. All true cardinals, as stated, may enter the conclave, but those only who have received deacon's orders have a right to vote, unless they have received a special indult from the late pope. Cardinals who have been preconized, but not yet elevated to the purple, are entitled by a decision of St. Pius V (1571) both to be present and to vote.

Including the cardinals, prelates, and conclavists, there are perhaps two hundred and fifty persons in the enclosure. The government of the conclave is in the hands of the cardinal camerlengo and of the three representative cardinals who succeed one another in order of seniority every three days. About seven or eight o'clock on the morning of the eleventh day the cardinals assemble in the Pauline Chapel and assist at the Mass of the cardinal dean. Formerly they wore the special garment of the conclave, called the crocea. They receive Communion from the hands of the cardinal dean, and listen to a Latin allocution on their obligations to select the most worthy person for the Chair of Peter. After Mass they retire for a few moments, and then assemble in the Sistine Chapel, where the actual voting takes place. There six candles are lighted on the altar on which rest the paten and chalice to be used in voting. Over the chair of each cardinal is a baldachinum. The papal throne is removed. Before each chair is also a small writing desk. When ready to vote they enter the Sistine Chapel accompanied by their conclavists bearing their portfolios and writing materials. Prayers are said by the bishop sacristan; the ballots are distributed and then all are excluded except the cardinals, one of whom bolts the door.

Though since Urban VI (1378-89) none but a cardinal has been elected pope, no law reserves to the cardinals alone this right. Strictly speaking, any male Christian who has reached the use of reason can be chosen -- not, however, a heretic, a schismatic, or a notorious simonist. Since 14 January, 1505 (Julius II, "Cum tam divino") a simoniacal election is canonically invalid, as being a true and indisputable act of heresy (Wernz, "Jus Decret.", II, 658, 662; see "Hist. Pol. Blätter", 1898, 1900, and Sägmüller, "Lehrbuch d. Kirchenrechts", 1900, I, 215).

There are four possible forms of election: scrutinium, compromissum, accessus, quasi-inspiratio. The usual form is that of scrutinium, or secret ballot, and in it the successful candidate requires a two-thirds vote exclusive of his own. When there is a close vote, and only then, the ballot of the pope-elect, which, like all the others, is distinguishable by a text of Scripture written on one of its outside folds, is opened to make sure that he did not vote for himself. Each cardinal deposits his vote in the chalice on the altar and at the same time takes the prescribed oath: "Testor Christum Dominum qui me judicaturus est me eligere quem secundum Deum judice eligi debere et quod idem in accessu præstabo"-"I call to witness the Lord Christ, Who will be my judge, that I am electing the one whom according to God I think ought to be elected", etc. (For the form of the oath see Lucius Lector, "Le Conclave", 615, 618.) The ballot reads: "Ego, Cardinalis N., eligo in summum Pontificem R. D. meum D. Card. N."

For this election by secret ballot three cardinals (scrutatores) are chosen by lot each time to preside over the operation of voting, three others (revisores) to control the count of their colleagues, and still three others (infirmarii) to collect the ballots of the sick and absent cardinals. If the sick cardinals cannot attend the balloting, then the three infirmarii go to their cells and bring back their votes in a box to the three cardinals presiding, who count them and put them in the chalice with the others. Then, all the ballots having been shaken up and counted, if the number agrees with the number of electors, the chalice is brought to the table and the ballots, on the outside of which appear the names of the candidates, are passed from hand to hand to the third cardinal who reads the names aloud. All present are provided with lists on which the names of all the cardinals appear, and it is customary for the cardinals to check off the votes as they are read. Then the three cardinal revisors verify the result which is proclaimed as definite.

If, upon the first ballot, no candidate receives the necessary two-thirds vote, recourse is often had to the form of voting known as accessus. At the election of Pius X (Rev. des Deux Mondes, 15 March, 1904, p. 275) the cardinal dean did not allow the accessus, though it is a recognized usage of conclaves, regulated by Gregory XI, designed primarily to hasten elections, and usually considered to favour the chances of the candidate who has the most votes. It consists practically of a second ballot. All use the ordinary blanks again, with this difference, that if the elector wishes his vote to count for his first choice he writes Accedo nomini; if he changes his vote he introduces the name of his latest choice. Then the two series of ballots have to be compared and identified by the text on the reverse face of the ballot, so as to prevent a double vote for the same candidate by any elector. When the required two-thirds are not obtained, the ballots are consumed in a stove whose chimney extends through a window of the Sistine Chapel. When there is no election, straw is mixed with the ballots to show by its thick smoke (sfumata) to those waiting outside that there has been no election. There are always two votes taken every day, in the morning and in the evening; they occupy from two to three hours each. When the voting is over one of the cardinals opens the door outside of which are gathered the conclavists, and all retire to their cells. Other forms of election, made almost impossible by the legislation of Gregory XV, are known as quasi-inspiration and compromise. The former supposes that before a given session there had been no agreement among the cardinals and that then one of the cardinals, addressing the assembly, proposes the name of a candidate with the words Ego eligo (I elect, etc.), whereupon all the cardinals, as though moved by the Holy Spirit, proclaim aloud the same candidate, saying Ego eligo, etc. An election by compromise supposes that after a long and hopeless contest the cardinals unanimously delegate a certain number of their body to make a choice. It has not been employed since the fourteenth century.

When a candidate has obtained the required two-thirds vote in a scrutiny or ballot (the choice, since Adrian VI, 1522, falling on one present and invariably on an Italian cardinal), the cardinal dean proceeds to ask him whether he will accept the election and by what name he wishes to be known. Since the time of John XII (955-64; Sägmüller says Sergius IV, 1009-1012) each pope takes a new name in imitation of St. Peter's change of name (see Knöpfler, "Die Namensänderung der Päpste" in "Compte rendu du congrés internat. cath. à Fribourg", 1897, sec. v, 158 sqq.). The doors have previously been opened by the secretary of the conclave; the masters of ceremonies are present, and formal cognizance is taken of the pope's answers. Immediately the masters of ceremonies lower the canopies of all the cardinals' chairs save that of the pope-elect, and he is conducted to a neighbouring room where he is clothed in the papal garments (immantatio). The cardinals then advance and pay him the first "obedience", or homage (adoratio). The pope then either confirms or appoints the cardinal camerlengo, who puts upon his finger the Fisherman's Ring. Then follows the proclamation to the people made by the senior cardinal-deacon, formerly from the central balcony of St. Peter's overlooking the great Piazza, but since 1870 in St. Peter's itself. The conclave then usually terminates, the masons remove the temporary walls, and the cardinals retire to their various lodgings in the city, awaiting a reassembling for the second and third adoratio and for the solemn enthroning. If the pope happens not to be a bishop, he must be consecrated at once and, according to immemorial tradition, by the Cardinal-Bishop of Ostia. If already a bishop, there takes place only the solemn benedictio or blessing. However, he enjoys full jurisdiction from the moment of his election. On the following Sunday or Holy Day takes place, at the hands of the senior cardinal-deacon, the papal "coronation" from which day the new pope dates the years of his pontificate. The last act is the formal taking possession (possessio) of the Lateran Church, omitted since 1870. For the so-called Veto, occasionally exercised in the past by the Catholic Powers (Spain, Austria, France), see RIGHT OF EXCLUSION.

The actually valid legislation concerning the conclave is found in all manuals of canon law, e.g. WERNZ, Jus. Decret. (Rome, 1899), II, 653-665; SÄGMÜLLER, Lehrbuch des Kirchenrechts (Freiburg, 1900), 313-19; HERGENRÖTHER- HOLWECK, Lehrbuch des cath. Kirchenrechts (Freiburg, 1903), 268-73; LAURENTIUS, Instit. jur. eccl. (Freiburg, 1903), nos. 99-103; cf. BOUIX, De Curiâ Romanâ, 120, and De Papâ, III, 341-44.-The history of the conclave and its ceremonial use fully described in the (illustrated) work of LUCIUS LECTOR (Mgr. Guthlin), Le Conclave (Paris, 1894). It replaces advantageously the earlier work of VANEL on the history of the conclaves (Paris, 1689; 3rd ed., Cologne, 1703). English descriptions like those of TROLLOPE (London, 1876) and CARTWRIGHT (Edinburgh, 1868) are generally unreliable, being largely inspired by the anti-papal histories of conclaves written by the mendacious and inexact GREGORIO LETI (s. l., 1667, 1716), and the inaccurate and maliciously gossipy PETRUCCELLI DELLA GATTINA (Brussles, 1865). See Dublin Reviewd (1868), XI, 374-91, and Civiltá Cattolica (1877), I, 574-85; also CREIGHTON in Academy (1877), XI, 66. See La nouvelle législation du conclave in Université cath. (Lyons, 1892), 5-47, and TEELING, The Development of the Conclave in The Dolphin (Philadelphia, 1908). For a catalogue of studies (often documentary) on special conclaves, see CLEROTI, Bibliografia di Roma papale e medievale (Rome, 1893). The conclave that elected Pius X is described by an eyewitness (Un Témoin), said to be Cardinal Mathieu, in Revue des Deux Mondes, 15 March, 1904. See other valuable recent literature in the articles, and RIGHT OF EXCLUSION.

AUSTIN DOWLING

References

  1. Back to citation Fanning, William H. W. (1913). "Vicar of Christ". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  2. Back to citation occurrence 2.0 Back to citation occurrence 2.1 Baumgartner 2003, p. 4.
  3. Back to citation Weber, N. A. (1913). "Pope Nicholas II". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  4. Back to citation Goyau, Georges (1913). "Second Council of Lyons (1274)". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  5. Back to citation occurrence 5.0 Back to citation occurrence 5.1 Back to citation occurrence 5.2 Back to citation occurrence 5.3 Back to citation occurrence 5.4 Back to citation occurrence 5.5 Back to citation occurrence 5.6 John Paul II (22 February 1996). Universi Dominici gregis Archived 6 May 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Apostolic constitution. Vatican City: Vatican Publishing House.
  6. Back to citation "Pope Issues Conclave Motu Proprio" Archived 13 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine National Catholic Register. 25 February 2013.
  7. Back to citation occurrence 7.0 Back to citation occurrence 7.1 Back to citation occurrence 7.2 Back to citation occurrence 7.3 Back to citation occurrence 7.4 Benedict XVI (11 June 2007). De aliquibus mutationibus in normis de electione Romani Pontificis Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine (in Latin). Motu proprio. Vatican City: Vatican Publishing House.
  8. Back to citation occurrence 8.0 Back to citation occurrence 8.1 "Pope alters voting for successor". BBC News. 26 June 2007.
  9. Back to citation occurrence 9.0 Back to citation occurrence 9.1 Back to citation occurrence 9.2 Back to citation occurrence 9.3 Dowling, A. (1913). "Conclave". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  10. Back to citation Signorotto and Visceglia 2002, p. 106
  11. Back to citation occurrence 11.0 Back to citation occurrence 11.1 Baumgartner 2003, pp. 32–33
  12. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 146
  13. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 145
  14. Back to citation Vacante A S, 1904
  15. Back to citation occurrence 15.0 Back to citation occurrence 15.1 Back to citation occurrence 15.2 Joyce, G. H. (1913). "Election of the Popes". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  16. Back to citation occurrence 16.0 Back to citation occurrence 16.1 Back to citation occurrence 16.2 Back to citation occurrence 16.3 Back to citation occurrence 16.4 Fanning, W. H. W. (1913). "Papal Elections". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  17. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 14–19.
  18. Back to citation occurrence 18.0 Back to citation occurrence 18.1 Guruge 2010, p. 49.
  19. Back to citation occurrence 19.0 Back to citation occurrence 19.1 Sägmüller, Johannes Baptist (1913). "Cardinal". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  20. Back to citation Miranda, Salvador. "Election of May 30 – November 25, 1277 (Nicholas III)".
  21. Back to citation Adams, John Paul (7 November 2010). "SEDE VACANTE 1277" Archived 13 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  22. Back to citation Kirsch, Johann Peter (1913). "Pope John XXI (XX)". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  23. Back to citation Each of these popes intended to promulgate a new constitution governing papal elections but died before doing so.
  24. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 44–46.
  25. Back to citation Levillain 2002, p. 848.
  26. Back to citation "https://cardinals.fiu.edu/cardinals.htm
  27. Back to citation Pope Paul VI (20 November 1970). "Ingravescentem aetatem". Vatican (in Latin). Retrieved 4 December 2017.
  28. Back to citation occurrence 28.0 Back to citation occurrence 28.1 Pope Paul VI (1 October 1975). "Romano Pontifici eligendo". Vatican (in Latin). Retrieved 4 December 2017.
  29. Back to citation Loughlin, James Francis (1913). "St. Ambrose". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  30. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 13.
  31. Back to citation Guruge 2010, p. 46–47.
  32. Back to citation occurrence 32.0 Back to citation occurrence 32.1 Baumgartner 2003, p. 21-23.
  33. Back to citation Hay, Denys (1989). Europe in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries (2nd ed.). Routledge. p.??. ISBN 9781317871903.
  34. Back to citation Löffler, Klemens (1910). "Pope Leo X". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  35. Back to citation Guruge 2010, p. 36-37.
  36. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 215.
  37. Back to citation Baumgartner, Frederic J. (2003). "10: Conclaves in the Twentieth Century". Behind Locked Doors: A History of the Papal Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 217. ISBN 9780312294632. Retrieved 12 July 2017. “The best authority on the conclave indicates that [Roncalli] had thirty-eight [votes], three more than required. Siri received ten, and Montini, two.”
  38. Back to citation Canon 1024 states: "A baptized male alone receives sacred ordination validly." John Paul II (25 January 1983). "THOSE TO BE ORDAINED" Archived 23 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Code of Canon Law IV(I)VI.II. Vatican City: Vatican Publishing House. Claims that there was a female pope, including the legendary Pope Joan, are fictitious. Kirsch, J.P. (1913). "Popess Joan". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Lord, Lewis (24 July 2000). "The lady was a pope: A bestseller revives the outlandish tale of Joan" Archived 17 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine. U.S. News Online. U.S. News & World Report.
  39. Back to citation "Canon 1". Papal Encyclicals Online. Third Council of the Lateran. 5 March 1179. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  40. Back to citation The London Magazine printed an image of a ballot design in 1903 with this description: "It is divided into three compartments, in the first of which the Cardinal writes his own name, in the second that of the candidate for whom he votes, and in the third a motto and number. The first and third compartments are then folded twice and sealed down [with wax] at both sides, so that only the middle compartment can be seen by the scrutineers [vote counters].... Should the majority be exactly two-thirds of the total votes recorded, the papers are opened and the names of those voting in the majority examined, in order to make sure that the elected Cardinal did not vote for himself." Wintle, W. J. (June 1903). "How the Pope is Elected: A Popular Account of the Conclave at Rome". London Magazine. 10: 569, 572–4; See also article transcription Archived 22 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine, without pagination
  41. Back to citation Reese, Thomas J. (1998). Inside the Vatican: The Politics and Organization of the Catholic Church. Harvard University Press. p. 295. ISBN 9780674418028. Retrieved 4 December 2017.
  42. Back to citation occurrence 42.0 Back to citation occurrence 42.1 Back to citation occurrence 42.2 Pius XII (8 December 1945). Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis Archived 19 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine (in Latin). Apostolic constitution. Vatican City.
  43. Back to citation John XXIII (5 September 1962). Summi Pontificis Electio (in Latin). Motu proprio. AAS. 54. (1962) pp. 632–640. Vatican City.
  44. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, Glossary.
  45. Back to citation Ludovisi, Alessandro (1913). "Pope Gregory XV". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  46. Back to citation Gregory XV (15 November 1621). "Aeterni Patris". Papal bull. Rome.
  47. Back to citation Toman, J. T. (5 January 2004). The Papal Conclave: How do Cardinals Divine the Will of God? Archived 10 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
  48. Back to citation Peterson, John B. (1913). "Pope St. Boniface I". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  49. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 10.
  50. Back to citation occurrence 50.0 Back to citation occurrence 50.1 Duffy 2006, p. 73.
  51. Back to citation Mann, Horace K. (1913). "Pope St. Benedict II". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  52. Back to citation Baumgartner 2003, p. 12.
  53. Back to citation Kurtz 1889, p. 489.
  54. Back to citation Mann, Horace K. (1913). "Pope John IX". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  55. Back to citation Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "John IX (pope)". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  56. Back to citation Nelson, Lynn H. (1999) "The Owl, The Cat, And The Investiture Controversy: 1000 – 1122" Archived 15 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
  57. Back to citation "The Concordat of Worms 1122" Archived 3 December 1998 at the Wayback Machine. Halsall, Paul (ed.) Internet Medieval Source Book (January 1996).
  58. Back to citation Sägmüller, Johannes Baptist (1913). "Right of Exclusion". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  59. Back to citation Boudinhon, Auguste (1911). "Conclave". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 829.
  60. Back to citation Guruge 2010, p. 141.
  61. Back to citation Wright, David (18 April 2005). "Inside Longest Papal Conclave in History" Archived 20 March 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Viterbo: ABC News.
  62. Back to citation Formerly, cardinals regularly had meals sent in from their homes with much pageantry accompanying the conveyance of food: "Towards noon each day, the Cardinal's gentlemen proceeded to his house and conveyed his dinner to the Vatican in a state coach. They were accompanied by an officer, known as the Seneschal Dapifer, who was charged with the very important duty of seeing that the Cardinal's food was not poisoned!... The dishes were enclosed in hampers or tin boxes, covered with green or violet drapery, and... were carried in state through the entrance halls, preceded by the mace of the cardinal. The Seneschal Dapifer, bearing a serviette on his shoulder, preceded the dishes.... Before the Cardinal received his dinner, each dish underwent a careful inspection by the prelates on guard, in order that no letter should be concealed in it." Wintle, W. J. (June 1903). "How the Pope is Elected: A Popular Account of the Conclave at Rome". London Magazine. 10: 569, 572–4; See also article transcription Archived 22 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine, without pagination These ceremonies have not been observed since the nineteenth century.
  63. Back to citation Goda, Paul (15 April 2005). "Papal Election Procedure: Incarnate History and Faith in a Higher Good" Archived 5 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine. Jurist Forum, University of Pittsburgh School of Law.
  64. Back to citation "'Message-hiding' food off the conclave menu - TopNews - Ansa.it" (in Italian). Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata. 8 May 2025.
  65. Back to citation Tersigni, Elisa (1 May 2025). "The great conclave secret: What do would-be popes eat?". BBC. Retrieved 27 December 2025.
    Rosso, Gambero (6 May 2025). "Dining with the Cardinals: here's what they eat during the Conclave". Gambero Rosso. Retrieved 27 December 2025.
  66. Back to citation Pronechen, Joseph (8 September 2025). "The Making of Pope Leo XIV: Cardinal Dolan Recalls a Conclave of 'Soul, Head, and Heart'". National Catholic Register. Irondale, Alabama, United States: EWTN News, Inc. Retrieved 27 December 2025. “Learning from the past, I knew to bring my own emergency rations — namely, peanut butter. … I sat down by myself for breakfast with a jar of Skippy, only to be joined by a certain Cardinal Robert Prevost, who was attracted to my table, certainly not by me, but by the peanut butter, which I was sharing!”
    Lopez, Kathryn Jean (8 May 2025). "Peanut Butter Brings Us Nearer, My God". National Review. Retrieved 27 December 2025.
  67. Back to citation Martin S.J., M. (1910). "The Roman Curia". The Ecclesiastical Review. 43: 426. Retrieved 3 November 2017.
  68. Back to citation "Interesting Conclave Facts". ewtn.com. Archived from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
  69. Back to citation "Cardinal Sodano elected dean of College of Cardinals". Cwnews.com. 2 May 2005. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  70. Back to citation Some have proposed the election of the pope by a special synod of bishops. This would imitate some of the Eastern-rite churches where metropolitans and patriarchs are elected by synods of bishops. The method for selecting the synod members would remain controversial. Cardinals and Conclaves Archived 23 August 2006 at the Wayback Machine, By Thomas J. Reese, S.J., senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center, America, 19 November 1994.
  71. Back to citation "Toward the conclave #1: the office of camerlengo". Cwnews.com. 5 April 2005. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  72. Back to citation Menachery George "Last Days of Pope John Paul II"http://www.indianchristianity.com/html/Books.html Archived 28 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  73. Back to citation occurrence 73.0 Back to citation occurrence 73.1 Sede Vacante Archived 25 August 2006 at the Wayback Machine, from Aquinas publishing
  74. Back to citation For a description of John Paul II's burial see A pope among popes
  75. Back to citation Ott, Michael T. (1913). "Pope Gregory XII". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  76. Back to citation Pope John Paul II (22 February 1996). "Universi Dominici Gregis". The Holy See. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. para. 77. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  77. Back to citation Stanford, Peter. "Pope resigns: The pope who was not afraid to say sorry". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 February 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  78. Back to citation "After 44 years, a new preacher for the popes". Aleteia — Catholic Spirituality, Lifestyle, World News, and Culture. Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  79. Back to citation "Conclave: biblical scholar to preach meditation to cardinals before voting begins | News Headlines". www.catholicculture.org. Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  80. Back to citation "The Conclave begins - Vatican News". www.vaticannews.va. 7 May 2025. Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  81. Back to citation "Cardinals gather for conclave, Czech Cardinal gives private sermon". Radio Prague International. 18 April 2005. Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  82. Back to citation Media, P. A. (8 March 2013). "Update 3: Maltese Cardinal to give meditation at beginning of conclave". Times of Malta. Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  83. Back to citation Wooden, Cindy (24 April 2025). "Cardinals choose prelates to offer reflections on church, future pope - OSV News". Retrieved 5 June 2026.
  84. Back to citation "Veni Creator Spiritus". Catholic Encyclopedia. New Advent. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  85. Back to citation Cardinals begin voting for new Pope Archived 13 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine (video, at 2:40 mins), Daily Telegraph, 12 March 2013. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  86. Back to citation Cardinals Gather to Mourn Pope, Choose Successor Archived 28 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine, 04.04.05, Newshour,
  87. Back to citation Procession and entrance in Conclave (Television production) (in Italian). Rome: Centro Televisivo Vaticano. 12 March 2013. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  88. Back to citation For a daily chronicle of Pope Francis election events and for his post election programmes until Easter 2013 reported by Menachery George cf. http://www.indianchristianity.com
  89. Back to citation If a cardinal with the right to vote should refuse to enter Vatican City in order to take part in the election, or subsequently, once the election has begun, should refuse to remain in order to discharge his office, without manifest reason of illness attested to under oath by doctors and confirmed by the majority of the electors, the other cardinals shall proceed freely with the election, without waiting for him or readmitting him. The Election of a New Pope Archived 17 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine, Malta Media.
  90. Back to citation 2 – Secret conclave, from the BBC
  91. Back to citation Poggioli, Sylvia (9 March 2013). "At The Vatican, A Social Media Blackout Keeps Cardinals Pure". NPR. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  92. Back to citation "Conclave: Cardinals to surrender phones, will survive on light meals".
  93. Back to citation "Vatican to deactivate mobile phone signal ahead of secret meeting to elect new pope".
  94. Back to citation occurrence 94.0 Back to citation occurrence 94.1 Back to citation occurrence 94.2 Universi Dominici gregis (Shepherd of the Lord's Whole Flock), promulgated by Pope John Paul II, 22 February 1995
  95. Back to citation occurrence 95.0 Back to citation occurrence 95.1 Ludwig Von Pastor, History of the Papacy, the Bulls of Gregory XV, Aeterni Patris, and Decet Romanum Pontificem 1621–1622.
  96. Back to citation occurrence 96.0 Back to citation occurrence 96.1 Francis Burkle Young, Conclaves in the 15th century; also see Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, a website maintained by Salvador Miranda, via FIU
  97. Back to citation Ludwig Von Pastor, History of the Papacy,
  98. Back to citation Benedict XVI (11 June 2007) " De aliquibus mutationibus in normis de electione Romani Pontificis" Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine Apostolic letter.
  99. Back to citation occurrence 99.0 Back to citation occurrence 99.1 Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, 8 December 1945, Pope Pius XII
  100. Back to citation occurrence 100.0 Back to citation occurrence 100.1 Vacante Sede Apostolica, 25 December 1904 Pope Pius X
  101. Back to citation occurrence 101.0 Back to citation occurrence 101.1 Pio, Oscar (1876). Storia popolare d'Italia dall'origine fino all'acquisto di Roma nell'anno 1870 compilata da Oscar Pio sulle tracce di Guicciardini, Botta, Balbo, Sismondi, Coletta, Cantù, La Farina, Varchi ecc (in Italian). G. Bestetti. p. 232.
  102. Back to citation The Parterre of fiction, poetry, history [&c.]. 1835. p. 398.
  103. Back to citation The North British Review. W.P. Kennedy. 1850. p. 181.
  104. Back to citation Chumley, Cheryl K. (12 March 2013). "What Do American Catholics Want in the Next Pope?". Fox News. The Washington Times. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  105. Back to citation Baumgartner, Frederic (2003). Behind Locked Doors: A History of the Papal Elections. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 241-245. ISBN 978-0-312-29463-2. Retrieved 18 February 2020. “smoke.”
  106. Back to citation Povoledo, Elisabetta (7 May 2025). "What Does Black Smoke Mean During Conclave to Elect New Pope?". The New York Times.
  107. Back to citation Beehivecandles.com
  108. Back to citation "Guiffre"
  109. Back to citation 3 – Voting rituals (), from the BBC series "Choosing a Pope"
  110. Back to citation occurrence 110.0 Back to citation occurrence 110.1 Back to citation occurrence 110.2 Lorch, Mark (7 May 2025). "Conclave: the chemistry behind the black and white smoke". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 7 May 2025. Retrieved 7 May 2025.
  111. Back to citation Fountain, Henry (11 March 2013). "Conclave Smoke's Recipe Is a Mystery". New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2013; Fountain, Henry (12 March 2013). "Vatican Reveals Recipes for Conclave Smoke". New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2013; "Así se consigue la fumata blanca y la negra" (in Spanish). Vatican City: ABC. Agencia EFE. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  112. Back to citation Fountain, Henry (11 March 2013). "Conclave Smoke's Recipe Is a Mystery". New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2013; Fountain, Henry (12 March 2013). "Vatican Reveals Recipes for Conclave Smoke". New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2013; "Así se consigue la fumata blanca y la negra" (in Spanish). Vatican City: ABC. Agencia EFE. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  113. Back to citation Thomas J. Reese SJ, Inside the Vatican: The Politics and Organization of the Catholic Church, Harvard University Press (1996), p. 99.
  114. Back to citation Menachery George, Vatican Adventure http://www.indianchristianity.com/html/menachery/html/GeorgeMenachery.htm Archived 14 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  115. Back to citation occurrence 115.0 Back to citation occurrence 115.1 Wintle, W. J. (June 1903). "How the Pope is Elected: A Popular Account of the Conclave at Rome". London Magazine. 10: 569, 572–4; See also article transcription Archived 22 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine, without pagination
  116. Back to citation Conclave A.D. 1963 – Election of Pope Paul VI Archived 9 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. YouTube video. Accessed 19 October 2013
  117. Back to citation Caeremoniale Romanum (22 April 2024). THE CONCLAVE [1963]. Retrieved 8 May 2025 – via YouTube.
  118. Back to citation "Dom Lorenzo Baldisseri recebe solideu cardinalício" (in Portuguese). Rádio Vaticano Portuguese section.
  119. Back to citation "Annuncio di Concistoro per la Creazione di Nuovi Cardinali" (in Italian). The Vatican Today. 12 January 2014. Archived from the original on 14 December 2017. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  120. Back to citation "L'annuncio dell'elezione del Papa" [Announcement of the election of the Pope]. Sala Stampa della Santa Sede. 13 March 2013. Archived from the original on 4 October 2014. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  121. Back to citation Richard Henry Clarke's book about Leo XIII claims that Prospero Caterini made the announcement Richard Henry Clarke (1903). The life of His Holiness Pope Leo XIII...: together with extracts from his pastorals and encyclicals. and Salvador Miranda's entry on Cardinal Caterini at The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church website mentions Caterini as having given the announcement "Caterini, Prospero". Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church. Archived from the original on 30 July 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2014. but Francis Burkle-Young claims that Caterini started to make the announcement but was incapable of completing the spoken formula and was ultimately assisted by Bartolomeo Grassi-Landi, a non-cardinal and the conclavist of Cardinal Luigi Oreglia di Santo Stefano Francis A. Burkle-Young (2000). Papal Elections in the Age of Transition, 1878–1922. Lexington Books. ISBN 9780739101148.
  122. Back to citation Menachery George, Vatican Adventure, Election of John Paul II, http://www.indianchristianity.com/html/menachery/html/GeorgeMenachery.htm Archived 14 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  123. Back to citation See for example the image at the cited article "How new Pope is elected" at Pophap "How new Pope is elected – POPHAPPOPHAP". Archived from the original on 20 December 2013. Retrieved 2 June 2013.
  124. Back to citation Elezione Papa Paolo VI (1963) Archived 23 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine. YouTube. Accessed on 22 December 2012.
  125. Back to citation "5 – New pope announced". Choosing a Pope. BBC.
  126. Back to citation Sullivan, Louis (12 March 2013). "Angels & Demons and Conclave 2013: True or False?". Busted Halo. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
  127. Back to citation CNA. "'Conclave' Fact Vs. Fiction: What Does the Hit Movie Get Right and Wrong?". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 28 April 2025.

Bibliography

Sources