List of papal conclaves

Papal elections since 1276 have taken the form of conclaves, which are elections that follow a set of rules and procedures developed in In nomine Domini (1059), Ubi periculum (1274) and later papal bulls; observance of the conclave varied until 1294, but all papal elections since have followed relatively similar conclave procedures.[1]
Although the cardinals have historically gathered at a handful of other locations within Rome and beyond, only five elections since 1455 have been held outside the Apostolic Palace.[2] Twenty-eight papal elections have been held outside Rome, in: Terracina (1088), Cluny (1119), Velletri (1181), Verona (1185), Ferrara (October 1187), Pisa (December 1187), Perugia (1216, 1264–1265, 1285, 1292–1294, 1304–1305), Anagni (1243), Naples (1254, 1294), Viterbo (1261, 1268–1271, July 1276, August–September 1276, 1277, 1281–1282), Arezzo (January 1276), Carpentras/Lyon (1314–1316), Avignon (1334, 1342, 1352, 1362, 1370), Konstanz (1417) and Venice (1799–1800). Three elections moved between locations while in progress: the elections of 1268–1271, 1292–1294, and 1314–1316.
Papal elections
- Elections that elected papal claimants currently regarded by the Catholic Church as antipopes are italicized.
See also
Literature
- Baumgartner, Frederic J. (2003). Behind Locked Doors: A History of the Papal Elections. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-312-29463-8.
References
- Back to citation occurrence 1.000 Back to citation occurrence 1.001 Back to citation occurrence 1.002 Back to citation occurrence 1.003 Back to citation occurrence 1.004 Back to citation occurrence 1.005 Back to citation occurrence 1.006 Back to citation occurrence 1.007 Back to citation occurrence 1.008 Back to citation occurrence 1.009 Back to citation occurrence 1.010 Back to citation occurrence 1.011 Back to citation occurrence 1.012 Back to citation occurrence 1.013 Back to citation occurrence 1.014 Back to citation occurrence 1.015 Back to citation occurrence 1.016 Back to citation occurrence 1.017 Back to citation occurrence 1.018 Back to citation occurrence 1.019 Back to citation occurrence 1.020 Back to citation occurrence 1.021 Back to citation occurrence 1.022 Back to citation occurrence 1.023 Back to citation occurrence 1.024 Back to citation occurrence 1.025 Back to citation occurrence 1.026 Back to citation occurrence 1.027 Back to citation occurrence 1.028 Back to citation occurrence 1.029 Back to citation occurrence 1.030 Back to citation occurrence 1.031 Back to citation occurrence 1.032 Back to citation occurrence 1.033 Back to citation occurrence 1.034 Back to citation occurrence 1.035 Back to citation occurrence 1.036 Back to citation occurrence 1.037 Back to citation occurrence 1.038 Back to citation occurrence 1.039 Back to citation occurrence 1.040 Back to citation occurrence 1.041 Back to citation occurrence 1.042 Back to citation occurrence 1.043 Back to citation occurrence 1.044 Back to citation occurrence 1.045 Back to citation occurrence 1.046 Back to citation occurrence 1.047 Back to citation occurrence 1.048 Back to citation occurrence 1.049 Back to citation occurrence 1.050 Back to citation occurrence 1.051 Back to citation occurrence 1.052 Back to citation occurrence 1.053 Back to citation occurrence 1.054 Back to citation occurrence 1.055 Back to citation occurrence 1.056 Back to citation occurrence 1.057 Back to citation occurrence 1.058 Back to citation occurrence 1.059 Back to citation occurrence 1.060 Back to citation occurrence 1.061 Back to citation occurrence 1.062 Back to citation occurrence 1.063 Back to citation occurrence 1.064 Back to citation occurrence 1.065 Back to citation occurrence 1.066 Back to citation occurrence 1.067 Back to citation occurrence 1.068 Back to citation occurrence 1.069 Back to citation occurrence 1.070 Back to citation occurrence 1.071 Back to citation occurrence 1.072 Back to citation occurrence 1.073 Back to citation occurrence 1.074 Back to citation occurrence 1.075 Back to citation occurrence 1.076 Back to citation occurrence 1.077 Back to citation occurrence 1.078 Back to citation occurrence 1.079 Back to citation occurrence 1.080 Back to citation occurrence 1.081 Back to citation occurrence 1.082 Back to citation occurrence 1.083 Back to citation occurrence 1.084 Back to citation occurrence 1.085 Back to citation occurrence 1.086 Back to citation occurrence 1.087 Back to citation occurrence 1.088 Back to citation occurrence 1.089 Back to citation occurrence 1.090 Back to citation occurrence 1.091 Back to citation occurrence 1.092 Back to citation occurrence 1.093 Back to citation occurrence 1.094 Back to citation occurrence 1.095 Back to citation occurrence 1.096 Back to citation occurrence 1.097 Back to citation occurrence 1.098 Back to citation occurrence 1.099 Back to citation occurrence 1.100 Back to citation occurrence 1.101 Back to citation occurrence 1.102 Back to citation occurrence 1.103 Back to citation occurrence 1.104 Back to citation occurrence 1.105 Back to citation occurrence 1.106 Back to citation occurrence 1.107 Back to citation occurrence 1.108 Back to citation occurrence 1.109 Back to citation occurrence 1.110 Back to citation occurrence 1.111 Back to citation occurrence 1.112 Back to citation occurrence 1.113 Back to citation occurrence 1.114 Back to citation occurrence 1.115 Back to citation occurrence 1.116 Back to citation occurrence 1.117 Baumgartner, Frederic J. (2003). Behind locked doors: a history of the Papal elections. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-29463-2.
- Back to citation Baumgartner, Frederic J. (2003). ""I Will Observe Absolute and Perpetual Secrecy:" The Historical Background of the Rigid Secrecy Found in Papal Elections". Catholic Historical Review. Vol. 89, Issue 2. pp. 165–181.
- Back to citation In the early days of the College of Cardinals, a total of seven cardinal-bishop positions existed, assuming all positions are filled at the time of an election, this represents the maximum number of potential electors. (Baumgartner, p. 27) By 1150, two of these posts had been combined, and until 1913 there were a total of 6 cardinal-bishops. In 1586 Sixtus V. revised the size of the college, these rules would stand until 1958. (Baumgartner, p. 131, compare footnote for the 1590 conclave)
- Back to citation According to the official protocol, Gregory was selected by an assembly in St. Peter that included cardinals and priests of the church, with the consent of attending bishops and by the acclamation of the crowd. It is unclear if the new 1059 rules were followed during his election. (Baumgartner p.24)
- Back to citation The election took place on 24 May 1086. However, the newly elected Desiderius initially refused the position, only accepting it at the Synod of Capua in March 1087. He was crowned on 9 May 1087.
- Back to citation Probably the first conclave that closely followed the 1059 rules. The group that elected Urban II was larger than that which had previously elected Victor III.
- Back to citation The first election under the 1059 rules for which a detailed account exists. Four cadinal-bishops along with 45 other non-voting cardinals were present when Gelasius II was elected unanimously.
- Back to citation Gelasius II was accompanied by 4 cardinal-bishops to France, where Gelasius died. The 4 cardinals elected his chosen successor. This marks the first election and coronation of a pope far away from Rome, and confirms the 1059 provision that a small number of cardinals could elect a pope under special circumstances.
- Back to citation Following the death of Callixtus, the Pierleoni and Frangipani families fought over the papal election. The cardinals initially elected Celestine II (not to be confused with the later pope Celestine II), but under duress by the Frangipani renounced his election, and the Frangipani-supported Honorius II was chosen by acclaim. Honoris then renounced this irregular acclamation, and was elected using the proper procedure the next day, after the remaining electors had been either bought off or threatened by Frangipani forces.
- Back to citation Innocent II was elected by a small group of cardinals supporting Haimeric, the cardinal instrumental in the election of Honorius.
- Back to citation Anacletus was chosen by a majority of the 41 cardinals opposed to Haimeric. This marks a departure from the previous election under the 1059 rules, in which only the cardinal-bishops were eligible to vote. Despite Anacletus' stronger support among the cardinals, he failed to be recognized by the northern European monarchs, and died before his opponent innocent. Anacletus successor Victor submitted to Innocent within a year of his election, both have since been considered antipopes.
- Back to citation elected "entirely consistent with the decree of 1059". Unclear if that means that only the small group of cardinal-bishops voted or the entire College of Cardinals.
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation Alexander III received a majority of votes which was opposed by at least 5 other cardinals that went on to elect Victor IV as antipope. His electorate probably numbered around the 40, based on the preceding elections.
- Back to citation Victor IV was chosen by a group of five cardinals loyal to the Holy Roman Emperor who objected to the election of Alexander III.
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation The first conclave following the Third Lateran Council, which declared that all cardinals, not just the 6 (previously 7) cardinal-bishops were eligible to elect the pope. This had already been the de facto practice during some conclaves of the previous decades. Because Lucius III was chosen unanimously, the new rules requiring a two-thirds majority did not come into play yet.
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation Innocent III died accompanied by only two other cardinals. The rest of the college tasked them with deciding on his successor, with one of the two being chosen, presumably without a formal vote taking place between the two.
- Back to citation presumably one day
- Back to citation The 18 cardinals tasked three of them with finding a candidate, the first refused and the second was chosen, it is unclear if a formal vote took place.
- Back to citation Two cardinals had been captured by Emperor Frederick II. Because the electors were locked in while voting this can be considered the first conclave, though this did not become standard practice for another 3 decades. Celestine IV died 17 days into his pontificate, and the it took almost a year and a half for the cardinals to come together for the next conclave.
- Back to citation Two of the cardinals were still captured, one died during the previous conclave, the other became Celestine IV and died.
- Back to citation 11 December 1254 to 12 December 1254
- Back to citation 26 May 1261 to 29 August 1261
- Back to citation compare article
- Back to citation 12 October 1264 to 5 February 1265
- Back to citation One cardinal was in France and could not participate.
- Back to citation 1 December 1268 to 1 September 1271
- Back to citation According to Baumgartner it took only an hour.
- Back to citation Walsh, Michael J. (2003). The Conclave. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 8. ISBN 1-58051-135-X.
- Back to citation The 1294 conclave is the first of which contemporary documents describing the process survive
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation 22 September 1362 to 28 September 1362. Clement VI's brother was elected on the first day but refused the office on health grounds.
- Back to citation After receiving the votes of all 15 French cardinals, Gregory IX, nephew of Clement VI, was elected unanimously on the next ballot.
- Back to citation 7 April 1378 to. 6 cardinals stayed in Avignon. Among those cardinals in Rome 11 were French, 4 Italian and 1 Spanish. A large roman mob surrounded the Vatican palace during the conclave, putting the cardinals under pressure to elect a Roman, or at least Italian, pope.
- Back to citation Elected unanimously.
- Back to citation Urban VI antagonized the cardinals so much that they declared the papacy vacant and proceeded to elected a new pope in Avignon. Urban had the support of the Roman populace and created new cardinals loyal to him. For the next 4 decades the papacy was split between Rome and Avignon.
- Back to citation Elected unanimously.
- Back to citation Elected unanimously, excluding Benedict himself, who at first refused the throne but the acquiesced.
- Back to citation Elected unanimously.
- Back to citation Elected unanimously.
- Back to citation The Council of Constance instituted a maximum limit of 24 cardinals. Since Martin V recognized all the cardinals appointed by the various Antipopes, that number was only reached by 1426.
- Back to citation 8 November 1417 to 9 November 1417. Cardinal Colonna received 15 votes on the second ballot, one short of the required two thirds majority. He was then selected by accession, unanimously.
- Back to citation After Clements death, a single die-hard cardinal elected a successor named Benedict XIV, who died in 1447.
- Back to citation occurrence 51.0 Back to citation occurrence 51.1 Back to citation occurrence 51.2 Back to citation occurrence 51.3 Back to citation occurrence 51.4 Back to citation occurrence 51.5 Back to citation occurrence 51.6 Chambers, DS. 1978. "Papal Conclaves and Prophetic Mystery in the Sistine Chapel". Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 41: pp. 322–326
- Back to citation This was the last conclave until 1958 in which non-Italians were a majority of the electorate.
- Back to citation Elected by accession after the second ballot. The first ballot was held on the third day of the conclave.
- Back to citation Elected by acclamation after the first ballot.
- Back to citation The vote was unanimous, with Borgia voting for himself.
- Back to citation This represents the largest group of cardinal-electors since the creation of the papal conclave. (Baumgartner, p. 87) (Ignoring some aberrations in the 12th century before the conclave format was fully established)
- Back to citation 16 September 1503 – 22 September 1503
- Back to citation 10 hours, according to Baumgartner
- Back to citation The vote was unanimous, except for the future pope, who did not vote for himself.
- Back to citation 30 December 1521 to 9 January 1522, one vote per day, with the final accession vote on the same day as the 11th scrutiny
- Back to citation 1 October 1523 to 18 November 1523, the first scrutiny was held on 6 October.
- Back to citation 11 October 1534 to 13 October 1534, but no voting took place on the 11th.
- Back to citation 29 November 1549 (19 days after Paull III death on 10 November) to 8 February 1550
- Back to citation Proclamation by adoration, followed by a unanimous ballot. The future Marcellus II voted for Cardinal Carafa, beginning a tradition of all-but-certain candidates casting their own vote for the dean of the college of cardinals.
- Back to citation Unanimously elected by acclamation
- Back to citation Not elected unanimously but by a close ballot
- Back to citation appointed by unanimous acclamation
- Back to citation Elected by acclamation on the first day, confirmed by a unanimous ballot on the second.
- Back to citation The vote was unanimous, except for the future pope, who did not vote for himself.
- Back to citation Sixtus V. fixed the size of the college at a maximum of 70 in 1586, a statute that would last until 1958. Any promotion that would exceed the limit was deemed invalid. Often the college had fewer members. The number of cardinal-bishops was lowered from seven to six, that of cardinal-priests increased from 28 to 50, and that of cardinal-deacons lowered from 18 to 14.
- Back to citation Urban and one other cardinal died, everyone else was still in Rome
- Back to citation Urban and one other cardinal died, everyone else was still in Rome
- Back to citation 7 October 1590 to 5 December 1590
- Back to citation Election was not unanimous
- Back to citation elected unanimously
- Back to citation 14 March 1605 – 1 April 1605
- Back to citation Leo XI and Cardinal Girolamo Agucchi both died, reducing the number of cardinals by two.
- Back to citation 8 May 1605 to 16 May 1605
- Back to citation 8 February 1621 to 9 February 1621
- Back to citation Gregory was elected by acclamation after the front-runner of the first and only ballot, Robert Bellarmine declined the position.
- Back to citation 19 July 1623 to 6 August 1623
- Back to citation No conclave between 1667 and 1830 lasted for fewer than three weeks.
- Back to citation 30 November 1799 to 14 March 1800
- Back to citation 2 September 1823 to 28 September 1823
- Back to citation 24 February 1829 to 31 March 1829
- Back to citation 14 December 1830 to 2 February 1831. No conclave since has lasted for more than one week or taken more than 14 ballots.
- Back to citation 14 June 1846 to 16 June 1846
- Back to citation 18 February 1878 to 20 February 1878
- Back to citation 31 July 1903 to 4 August 1903
- Back to citation 31 August 1914 to 3 September 1914
- Back to citation 2 February 1922 to 6 February 1922
- Back to citation 1 March 1939 to 2 March 1939
- Back to citation 25 October 1958 to 28 October 1958
- Back to citation 19 June 1963 to 21 June 1963
- Back to citation 25 August 1978 to 26 August 1978
- Back to citation 14 October 1978 to 16 October 1978
- Back to citation 18 April 2005 to 19 April 2005
- Back to citation Greeley, Andrew M. 2005. The Making of the Pope: 2005. Brown, Little. ISBN 0-316-86149-9.
- Back to citation 12 March 2013 to 13 March 2013
- Back to citation Lyman, Eric J. (1 March 2013). "Vatican summons cardinals for conclave". USA Today. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
- Back to citation "Argentine Cardinal Bergoglio elected pope, takes name Francis". 13 March 2013.
- Back to citation 7 May 2025 to 8 May 2025
- Back to citation "Entry into Conclave and Oath". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2025-05-08.